<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[FINRA Arbitration - Russell L. Forkey]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/categories/finra-arbitration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/categories/finra-arbitration/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey's Website]]></description>
        <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2024 17:36:57 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        
        <language>en-us</language>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Fraudulent Day Trading Scheme – Boca Raton, Florida Fraud and Misrepresentation FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/fraudulent_day_trading_scheme_-_boca_raton_florida_fraud_and_misrepresentation_finra_arbitration_and/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/fraudulent_day_trading_scheme_-_boca_raton_florida_fraud_and_misrepresentation_finra_arbitration_and/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2014 16:03:43 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Commercial and Business Dispute Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Federal Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[FINRA Arbitration]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Fraud and Misrepresentation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Online Trading Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions 2014]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Boca Raton, Florida – Fraudulent Day Trading Scheme FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney: SEC Charges Unregistered Broker in Tampa Area With Stealing From Investors in Fraudulent Day Trading Scheme The Securities and Exchange Commission recently charged an unregistered broker living outside Tampa, Fla., with stealing investor funds as part of a fraudulent day trading scheme.&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Boca Raton, Florida – Fraudulent Day Trading Scheme FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney:</h2>


<p><strong>SEC Charges Unregistered Broker in Tampa Area With Stealing From Investors in Fraudulent Day Trading Scheme</strong></p>


<p>The Securities and Exchange Commission recently charged an unregistered broker living outside Tampa, Fla., with stealing investor funds as part of a fraudulent day trading scheme.</p>


<p>The SEC alleges that Albert J. Scipione and his business partner solicited investors to establish accounts at their company called Traders Café for the purposes of day trading, which entails the rapid buying and selling of stocks throughout the day in hope that the stock values continue climbing or falling for the seconds to minutes they own them so they can lock in quick profits. Scipione touted Traders Café’s software trading platform and made a series of false misrepresentations to investors about low commissions and fees, high trading leverage, and safety of their assets. More than $500,000 was raised from investors who were assured that funds invested with Traders Café would be segregated and used only for day trading or other specific business purposes. However, many customers encountered technical service problems that prevented them from trading at all, and Scipione and his business partner squandered nearly all of the money in investor accounts for their personal use. Meanwhile, Traders Café was never registered with the SEC as a broker-dealer as required under the federal securities laws.</p>


<p>The SEC previously charged Scipione’s business partner Matthew P. Ionno, who agreed to settle the case and has been barred from the securities industry. Financial penalties will be decided by the court at a later date.</p>


<p>In a parallel action, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Florida today announced that Scipione has pleaded guilty to criminal charges. The U.S. Attorney’s Office previously brought a criminal case against Ionno.</p>


<p>According to the SEC’s complaint filed against Scipione in federal court in Tampa, customers across the country deposited approximately $367,000 with Traders Café from December 2012 to October 2013 with the intention of opening day trading accounts. Traders Café also received approximately $150,000 from an investor who invested directly in Traders Café’s business. Customers encountered problems with Traders Café from the outset, and many of them cancelled their accounts and requested refunds of their remaining account balances. Scipione and Ionno tried to cover up their fraudulent scheme by offering excuses and delays for why customers could not get refunds. Eventually less than $1,200 remained in Traders Café’s accounts primarily due to the repeated misuse of investor funds by Scipione and Ionno.</p>


<p>The SEC previously charged Scipione’s business partner Matthew P. Ionno, who agreed to settle the case and has been barred from the securities industry. Financial penalties will be decided by the court at a later date.</p>


<p>In a parallel action, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Florida today announced that Scipione has pleaded guilty to criminal charges. The U.S. Attorney’s Office previously brought a criminal case against Ionno.</p>


<p>According to the SEC’s complaint filed against Scipione in federal court in Tampa, customers across the country deposited approximately $367,000 with Traders Café from December 2012 to October 2013 with the intention of opening day trading accounts. Traders Café also received approximately $150,000 from an investor who invested directly in Traders Café’s business. Customers encountered problems with Traders Café from the outset, and many of them cancelled their accounts and requested refunds of their remaining account balances. Scipione and Ionno tried to cover up their fraudulent scheme by offering excuses and delays for why customers could not get refunds. Eventually less than $1,200 remained in Traders Café’s accounts primarily due to the repeated misuse of investor funds by Scipione and Ionno.</p>


<p>The SEC’s complaint against Scipione alleges that he violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 as well as Section 15(a) and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5. The SEC seeks disgorgement of ill-gotten gains, financial penalties, and permanent injunctive relief to enjoin Scipione from future violations of the federal securities laws.</p>


<p><strong>Contact Us:</strong></p>


<p>With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of elder abuse, exploitation and securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation.</p>


<p>At the Boca Raton Law Office of Russell L. Forkey, we represent clients throughout South and Central Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Sunrise, Plantation, Coral Springs, Deerfield Beach, Pompano Beach, Delray, Boynton Beach, Hollywood, Lake Worth, Royal Palm Beach, Manalapan, Jupiter, Gulf Stream, Wellington, Fort Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jupiter, Miami, Orlando, Maitland, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Heathrow, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa Beach, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormand Beach, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Dade County, Orange County, Seminole County, Martin County, Brevard County, Indian River County, Volusia County and Monroe County, Florida. The law office of Russell L. Forkey also represents South American, Canadian and other foreign residents that do business with U.S. financial institutions, investment advisors, brokerage and precious metal firms.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Valuations of Unlisted Real Estate Investment Trusts and Direct Participation Programs – Boca Raton, Florida REIT and DPP FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/valuations_of_unlisted_real_estate_investment_trusts_and_direct_participation_programs_-_boca_raton/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/valuations_of_unlisted_real_estate_investment_trusts_and_direct_participation_programs_-_boca_raton/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2014 21:29:42 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Broker/Dealer]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[False and Misleading Sales Material]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[FINRA Arbitration]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Investor Alerts]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Private Placements / Direct Investments]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[REIT's]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[The FINRA Rule Watch - FINRA Rules of Importance to Investors]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[The SEC Rule Watch - SEC Rules of Importance to Investors]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>SEC Order Approving FINRA Rule Change Relative to How Member Firms are Required to Calculate the Value of Unlisted Real Estate Investment Trusts and Direct-Participation Programs: The Sec has approved FINRA’s plan to overhaul how member firms calculate the value of unlised real estate investment trusts (“REITs”) and direct-participation programs (“DPPs”). Under the new rules&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<h2 class="wp-block-heading">SEC Order Approving FINRA Rule Change Relative to How Member Firms are Required to Calculate the Value of Unlisted Real Estate Investment Trusts and Direct-Participation Programs:</h2>


<p>The Sec has approved FINRA’s plan to overhaul how member firms calculate the value of unlised real estate investment trusts (“REITs”) and direct-participation programs (“DPPs”).  Under the new rules – specifically FINRA Rule 2310 – the firms will be required to include on customer account statements a per-share estimated value for any unlisted REIT and DPP securities that they have reason to believe is reliable.  </p>


<p>Firms also will need to make new disclsoures about the nature of the investment, including that they are not traded on a public securities exchange and that the price that the investor receives may be less than the estimated per-shre value.  </p>


<p>Please keep in mind that the above information is being provided for informational purposes only.  Thus, it is not designed to be complete in all material respects.  If you have any questions relative thereto, you should contact a qualified professional.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Bradley Thomas Badger – Boca Raton, Florida Account Executive Unapproved Outside Business Activity FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/bradley_thomas_badger_-_boca_raton_florida_account_executive_unapproved_outside_business_activity_fi/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/bradley_thomas_badger_-_boca_raton_florida_account_executive_unapproved_outside_business_activity_fi/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 14:45:49 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Breach of Fiduciary Duty]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Broker/Dealer]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Commercial and Business Dispute Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[FINRA]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[FINRA Arbitration]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[FINRA Enforcement Actions]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[FINRA Enforcement Actions 2014]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[FINRA Enforcement Defense]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Unapproved Outside Business Activity]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Bradley Thomas Badger – Boca Raton, Florida Account Executive Unapproved Outside Business Activity FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (FINRA) is a self-regulatory authority assigned the responsibility, by the Securities and Exchange Commission, to license, regulate and discipline securities broker/dealers and their employees, including account executives. In the event that&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p><strong><strong>Bradley Thomas Badger – Boca Raton, Florida Account Executive Unapproved Outside Business Activity FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney</strong></strong></p>


<p>The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (FINRA) is a self-regulatory authority assigned the responsibility, by the Securities and Exchange Commission, to license, regulate and discipline securities broker/dealers and their employees, including account executives. In the event that FINRA elects to institute an enforcement action, firms and licensed individuals have the responsibility to reflect such action on their U-4 and/or U-5 filings, which can be viewed on the FINRA website under the broker-check section of the site or by viewing the monthly disciplinary information also provided on the FINRA site.</p>


<p>The monthly disciplinary information is referenced on the FINRA site generally in alphabetical order. This post relates to the following company or individuals. If the reader would like to review the entire FINRA release or the broker-check information concerning this matter, you can follow these highlighted links:</p>


<p><strong>September 2014 Disciplinary and Other FINRA Actions</strong></p>


<p><strong>Broker Check: </strong><a href="http://www.finra.org/Investors/ToolsCalculators/BrokerCheck/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><strong>http://www.finra.org/Investors/ToolsCalculators/BrokerCheck/</strong></a></p>


<p><strong>Bradley Thomas Badger (CRD #5665584, Pleasanton, California) </strong>submitted a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent in which he was assessed a deferred fine of $10,000 and suspended from association with any FINRA member in any capacity for 30 business days. Without admitting or denying the findings, Badger consented to the sanctions and to the entry of findings that he failed to provide prior written notice of his involvement in an outside business activity to his member firm.  (<strong>FINRA Case #2012034456903</strong>).</p>


<p>Contact Us:</p>


<p>With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of elder abuse, exploitation and securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation.</p>


<p>At the Boca Raton Law Office of Russell L. Forkey, we represent clients throughout South and Central Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Sunrise, Plantation, Coral Springs, Deerfield Beach, Pompano Beach, Delray, Boynton Beach, Hollywood, Lake Worth, Royal Palm Beach, Manalapan, Jupiter, Gulf Stream, Wellington, Fort Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jupiter, Miami, Orlando, Maitland, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Heathrow, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa Beach, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormand Beach, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Dade County, Orange County, Seminole County, Martin County, Brevard County, Indian River County, Volusia County and Monroe County, Florida. The law office of Russell L. Forkey also represents South American, Canadian and other foreign residents that do business with U.S. financial institutions, investment advisors, brokerage and precious metal firms.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Luciano Andres Battioli – Boca Raton, Florida Account Executive Conversion and Theft FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/bruce_a_lefavi_securities_inc_and_bruce_anthony_lefavi_-_boca_raton_florida_false_andor_misleading_a/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/bruce_a_lefavi_securities_inc_and_bruce_anthony_lefavi_-_boca_raton_florida_false_andor_misleading_a/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 13:37:44 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Broker/Dealer]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Commercial and Business Dispute Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Elder Abuse]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[False and Misleading Sales Material]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Federal Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[FINRA]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[FINRA Arbitration]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[FINRA Enforcement Actions]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[FINRA Enforcement Actions 2014]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[FINRA Enforcement Defense]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[News of Interest to Seniors]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Social Media Fraud]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Luciano Andres Battioli – Boca Raton, Florida Account Executive Conversion and Theft FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (FINRA) is a self-regulatory authority assigned the responsibility, by the Securities and Exchange Commission, to license, regulate and discipline securities broker/dealers and their employees, including account executives. In the event that FINRA&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p><strong>Luciano Andres Battioli – Boca Raton, Florida Account Executive Conversion and Theft FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney</strong></p>



<p>The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (FINRA) is a self-regulatory authority assigned the responsibility, by the Securities and Exchange Commission, to license, regulate and discipline securities broker/dealers and their employees, including account executives. In the event that FINRA elects to institute an enforcement action, firms and licensed individuals have the responsibility to reflect such action on their U-4 and/or U-5 filings, which can be viewed on the FINRA website under the broker-check section of the site or by viewing the monthly disciplinary information also provided on the FINRA site.</p>



<p>The monthly disciplinary information is referenced on the FINRA site generally in alphabetical order. This post relates to the following company or individuals. If the reader would like to review the entire FINRA release or the broker-check information concerning this matter, you can follow these highlighted links:</p>



<p><strong>September 2014 Disciplinary and Other FINRA Actions</strong></p>



<p><strong>Broker Check:&nbsp;</strong><a href="http://www.finra.org/Investors/ToolsCalculators/BrokerCheck/" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank"><strong>http://www.finra.org/Investors/ToolsCalculators/BrokerCheck/</strong></a></p>



<p><strong>Luciano Andres Battioli (CRD #6229734, Huntington Beach, California) s</strong>ubmitted a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent in which he was barred from association with any FINRA member in any capacity. Without admitting or denying the findings, Battioli consented to the sanction and to the entry of findings that he converted funds belonging to customers of his member firm’s affiliate bank, and forged and falsified bank documents. (<strong>FINRA Case #2013039521501</strong>)</p>



<p>Contact Us:</p>



<p>With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of elder abuse, exploitation and securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation.</p>



<p>At the Boca Raton Law Office of Russell L. Forkey, we represent clients throughout South and Central Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Sunrise, Plantation, Coral Springs, Deerfield Beach, Pompano Beach, Delray, Boynton Beach, Hollywood, Lake Worth, Royal Palm Beach, Manalapan, Jupiter, Gulf Stream, Wellington, Fort Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jupiter, Miami, Orlando, Maitland, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Heathrow, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa Beach, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormand Beach, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Dade County, Orange County, Seminole County, Martin County, Brevard County, Indian River County, Volusia County and Monroe County, Florida. The law office of Russell L. Forkey also represents South American, Canadian and other foreign residents that do business with U.S. financial institutions, investment advisors, brokerage and precious metal firms.</p>



<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Oscar F. Villarreal – Boca Raton, Florida Investment and Investment Advisor Fraud Litigation and Arbitration Attorney]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/oscar_f_villarreal_-_boca_raton_florida_investment_and_and_investment_advisor_fraud_litigation_and_a/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/oscar_f_villarreal_-_boca_raton_florida_investment_and_and_investment_advisor_fraud_litigation_and_a/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 12:34:45 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Commercial and Business Dispute Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Elder Abuse]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Federal Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[FINRA Arbitration]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Fraud and Misrepresentation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Investment Advisor]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions 2014]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities and Securities Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Securities and Exchange Commission v. Oscar F. Villarreal, Civil Action No. 14-cv-01891 Former Cleveland-Area Investment Promoter Oscar F. Villarreal Indicted On September 16, 2014, the United States Attorney for the Northern District of Ohio obtained a Grand Jury indictment charging Oscar F. Villarreal with ten counts of wire fraud, seven counts of money laundering, one&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p><strong><em>Securities and Exchange Commission v. Oscar F. Villarreal</em>, Civil Action No. 14-cv-01891</strong></p>


<p><strong>Former Cleveland-Area Investment Promoter Oscar F. Villarreal Indicted</strong></p>


<p>On September 16, 2014, the United States Attorney for the Northern District of Ohio obtained a Grand Jury indictment charging Oscar F. Villarreal with ten counts of wire fraud, seven counts of money laundering, one count of securities fraud, and one count of investment adviser fraud.</p>


<p>The Indictment’s allegations are based on the same conduct underlying the Commission’s August 26, 2014 Complaint against Villarreal filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio.</p>


<p>The SEC’s Complaint alleges that from March 2009 through December 2010, Villarreal conducted a fraudulent offering, known as Fund III, which raised $9.2 million from 46 investors. According to the complaint, Villarreal told investors that their money was to be used to make private equity investments in companies in the petroleum, steel, and other industries in Mexico. Villarreal lied to these investors about the success of a previous fund he operated, lied in saying that he used their money to purchase and profitably operate a Mexican pipeline manufacturer, and lied by telling investors that Fund III had ownership interests in several U.S. and Mexican drilling companies. Villarreal instead used $7.4 million of Fund III assets to trade in publicly traded securities in a brokerage account-contrary to his representations to investors-and sustained heavy losses, and also stole $5.8 million for himself. By November 2011, Fund III was essentially insolvent.</p>


<p>The Commission’s complaint also alleges that, between August 2010 and March 2011, Villarreal conducted a second fraudulent offering, known as the Standard Asset Management Fund I, (“SAM Fund”), which raised $9 million from 11 investors, six of whom had previously invested in Fund III. According to the complaint, Villarreal told these investors that the SAM Fund would invest in companies listed on the Mexican stock exchange. Villarreal made numerous misrepresentations to these investors. Among other things, Villarreal repeated his earlier lies about Fund II and Fund III’s purported acquisition and profitable operation of a Mexican pipeline manufacturer, he stole at least $327,000 of SAM Fund assets, and Villarreal’s trading was a massive failure, resulting in an 83% loss for the SAM Fund.</p>


<p>The complaint also alleges that Villarreal defrauded the SAM Fund investors between March 2012 and May 2012 by offering to “exchange” limited partnership units he claimed he owned in Fund III for the SAM Fund investors’ limited partnership units in the SAM Fund. Eight SAM Fund investors accepted Villarreal’s offer and exchanged their SAM Fund units, which they had purchased for a total of $3.1 million. Villarreal, however, lied about the number of Fund III limited partnership units he owned and the value of the Fund III units. Villarreal did not disclose to these investors that the Fund III limited partnership units were worthless.</p>


<p>The SEC’s Complaint alleges that Villarreal violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, Sections 206(1), 206(2), and 206(4) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and Rule 206(4)-8 thereunder. The Commission’s complaint seeks a permanent injunction, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains plus prejudgment interest, and civil penalties.</p>


<p><strong>Contact Us:</strong></p>


<p>With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of elder abuse, exploitation and securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation.</p>


<p>At the Boca Raton Law Office of Russell L. Forkey, we represent clients throughout South and Central Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Sunrise, Plantation, Coral Springs, Deerfield Beach, Pompano Beach, Delray, Boynton Beach, Hollywood, Lake Worth, Royal Palm Beach, Manalapan, Jupiter, Gulf Stream, Wellington, Fort Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jupiter, Miami, Orlando, Maitland, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Heathrow, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa Beach, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormand Beach, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Dade County, Orange County, Seminole County, Martin County, Brevard County, Indian River County, Volusia County and Monroe County, Florida. The law office of Russell L. Forkey also represents South American, Canadian and other foreign residents that do business with U.S. financial institutions, investment advisors, brokerage and precious metal firms.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Patrick G. Rooney, John R. Rooney and Positron Corporation – Boca Raton, Florida Market Manipulation and Investment Fraud Litigation and Arbitration Attorney]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/patrick_g_rooney_john_r_rooney_and_positron_corporation_-_boca_raton_florida_market_manipulation_and/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/patrick_g_rooney_john_r_rooney_and_positron_corporation_-_boca_raton_florida_market_manipulation_and/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 12:14:29 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Commercial and Business Dispute Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Elder Abuse]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[FINRA Arbitration]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Fraud and Misrepresentation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Penny Stock Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions 2014]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities and Securities Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[State Litigation]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Patrick G. Rooney, John R. Rooney and Positron Corporation – Boca Raton, Florida Market Manipulation and Investment Fraud Litigation and Arbitration Attorney SEC v. Patrick G. Rooney, John R. Rooney, and Positron Corporation, Civil Action No. 9:14-cv-81224-KAM (U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida) The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that on September&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p><strong>Patrick G. Rooney, John R. Rooney and Positron Corporation – Boca Raton, Florida Market Manipulation and Investment Fraud Litigation and Arbitration Attorney</strong></p>


<p><strong><em>SEC v. Patrick G. Rooney, John R. Rooney, and Positron Corporation</em>, Civil Action No. 9:14-cv-81224-KAM (U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida)</strong></p>


<p>The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that on September 30, 2014 it filed a civil injunctive action charging Positron Corporation, a microcap company based in Westmont, Ill., Patrick G. Rooney of Oak Brook, Ill., the company’s then-CEO, and John R. Rooney of Jupiter, Fla., a penny stock promoter, for orchestrating a market manipulation scheme involving the company’s stock.</p>


<p>According to the SEC’s complaint filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Positron Corporation, Patrick Rooney, and John Rooney, engaged in market manipulation fraud in which they made an inducement payment to a stock promoter who would purchase shares of Positron in the open market ahead of planned press releases to help them manipulate the stock. The SEC alleges that the scheme was designed to generate the appearance of market activity in the company’s stock to induce investors to purchase the stock and artificially increase the trading price and volume.</p>


<p>The SEC’s complaint alleges that the defendants violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rules 10b-5(a) and 10b-5(c). The SEC is seeking permanent injunctions and civil money penalties against all three defendants, as well as penny stock bars against both Patrick and John Rooney and an officer-and-director bar against Patrick Rooney.</p>


<p><strong>Contact Us:</strong></p>


<p>With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of elder abuse, exploitation and securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation.</p>


<p>At the Boca Raton Law Office of Russell L. Forkey, we represent clients throughout South and Central Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Sunrise, Plantation, Coral Springs, Deerfield Beach, Pompano Beach, Delray, Boynton Beach, Hollywood, Lake Worth, Royal Palm Beach, Manalapan, Jupiter, Gulf Stream, Wellington, Fort Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jupiter, Miami, Orlando, Maitland, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Heathrow, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa Beach, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormand Beach, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Dade County, Orange County, Seminole County, Martin County, Brevard County, Indian River County, Volusia County and Monroe County, Florida. The law office of Russell L. Forkey also represents South American, Canadian and other foreign residents that do business with U.S. financial institutions, investment advisors, brokerage and precious metal firms.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Mutual Fund – Boca Raton, Florida Mutual Fund Unsuitability and Breach of Fiduciary Duty FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/mutual_fund_-_boca_raton_florida_mutual_fund_unsuitability_and_breach_of_fiduciary_duty_finra_arbitr/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/mutual_fund_-_boca_raton_florida_mutual_fund_unsuitability_and_breach_of_fiduciary_duty_finra_arbitr/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2014 23:36:12 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Breach of Fiduciary Duty]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Broker/Dealer]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Elder Abuse]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[FINRA Arbitration]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[General Investment News]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Investment Terms and Concepts]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Negligent Supervision]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Unsuitable Investment Recommendations]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Mutual Fund Unsuitability and Breach of Fiduciary Duty – Boca Raton, Florida FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney. A mutual fund is a fund operated by an investment company that raises money from shareholders and invests in bonds, options, currencies, money market securities, futures, or stocks. Mutual funds are offered by prospectus. The prospectus describes, among&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Mutual Fund Unsuitability and Breach of Fiduciary Duty – Boca Raton, Florida FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney.</h2>


<p>A mutual fund is a fund operated by an investment company that raises money from shareholders and invests in bonds, options, currencies, money market securities, futures, or stocks.  Mutual funds are offered by prospectus.  The prospectus describes, among other things, the investment objectives of the mutual fund, the types of investments within the fund, the investment strategies utilized by the fund managers and the risks associated therewith.</p>


<p>Mutual funds offer investors the advantages of diversification and professional management.  A management fee is charged for these services, typically between 0.5% and 2% of assets per year.  Funds also levy other fees such as a 12B-1, exchange fees and other administrative charges.  Funds that are sold through brokers are called load funds and those sold to investors directly from the fund companies are called no-load funds.  Mutual fund shares are redeemable on demand at net asset value by shareholders.</p>


<p>Please keep in mind that the above information is being provided for informational purposes only.  It is not designed to be complete in all material respects.  Thus, it should not be relied upon as legal or investment advice.  If you have any questions concerning the contents of this post, please contact a qualified professional.</p>


<p><strong>Contact Us:</strong></p>


<p>With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of elder abuse, exploitation and securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation.</p>


<p>At the Boca Raton Law Office of Russell L. Forkey, we represent clients throughout South and Central Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Sunrise, Plantation, Coral Springs, Deerfield Beach, Pompano Beach, Delray, Boynton Beach, Hollywood, Lake Worth, Royal Palm Beach, Manalapan, Jupiter, Gulf Stream, Wellington, Fort Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jupiter, Miami, Orlando, Maitland, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Heathrow, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa Beach, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormand Beach, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Dade County, Orange County, Seminole County, Martin County, Brevard County, Indian River County, Volusia County and Monroe County, Florida. The law office of Russell L. Forkey also represents South American, Canadian and other foreign residents that do business with U.S. financial institutions, investment advisors, brokerage and precious metal firms.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Scam Websites (Affinity Fraud) – Buyer Beware – South Florida Investment and Securities Fraud Litigation and Arbitration Attorney]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/scam_websites_affinity_fraud_-_buyer_beware_-_south_florida_investment_and_securities_fraud_litigati/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/scam_websites_affinity_fraud_-_buyer_beware_-_south_florida_investment_and_securities_fraud_litigati/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2014 11:50:58 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Affinity Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Commercial and Business Dispute Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Elder Abuse]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Federal Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[FINRA Arbitration]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Foreign Investors]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Ponzi Scheme News]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions 2014]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities and Securities Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Social Media Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[State Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Theft]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Affinity and Elder Financial Abuse and Exploitation Fraud, Misrepresentation and Theft – Boca Raton, Delray Beach, Lake Worth, Boynton Beach and Deerfield Beach, Florida Litigation and Arbitration Attorney: SEC Announces Cases Targeting International Pyramid Scheme Operators The Securities and Exchange Commission recently announced charges against the operators of an international pyramid scheme that raised more&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Affinity and Elder Financial Abuse and Exploitation Fraud, Misrepresentation and Theft – Boca Raton, Delray Beach, Lake Worth, Boynton Beach and Deerfield Beach, Florida Litigation and Arbitration Attorney:</h2>


<p><strong>SEC Announces Cases Targeting International Pyramid Scheme Operators</strong></p>


<p>The Securities and Exchange Commission recently announced charges against the operators of an international pyramid scheme that raised more than $129 million from investors worldwide, primarily in the U.S., China, and Taiwan. The case follows another against a separate pyramid scheme that lured investors in the U.S., China, and Korea with seminars, webinars, and YouTube videos.</p>


<p>The newest case, filed in federal court in San Francisco, charges Hong Kong-based eAdGear Holdings Limited and California-based eAdGear, Inc., along with operators Charles S. Wang and Qian Cathy Zhang, of Warren, N.J., and Francis Y. Yuen, of Dublin, Calif. According to the SEC complaint, even though eAdGear claimed to be a successful Internet marketing company, nearly all of its revenue was generated by investors, not its products or services.</p>


<p>The complaint alleges that eAdGear’s operators used money from new investors to pay earlier investors as well as to repay a personal loan and purchase million-dollar homes for themselves. It alleges the operators concealed and perpetuated the scheme by displaying sham websites on eAdGear’s own site to make it appear as if it had real, paying customers and manipulated revenue distributions to investors to appear profitable.</p>


<p>“eAdGear and its operators falsely claimed that they were running a profitable Internet marketing company when in reality, they were operating a Ponzi and pyramid scheme that preyed on Chinese communities and caused investors to lose millions of dollars,” said Jina L. Choi, director of the SEC’s San Francisco Regional Office.</p>


<p>The eAdGear case follows one filed Monday in federal court in Georgia against Zhunrize Inc. and CEO Jeff Pan for allegedly defrauding investors of more than $105 million since 2012. Despite its claims to be a legitimate multi-level marketing company, Zhunrize derived most of its funds from selling memberships, not products, according to the SEC complaint.</p>


<p>“Zhunrize claimed to offer investors the opportunity to be an ‘e-commerce Business Owner’ selling products to customers through a website. In fact, it was a pyramid and ‘profits’ came from fees paid by later investors,” said William Hicks, associate regional director of the SEC’s Atlanta Regional Office.</p>


<p>In both cases, the courts granted the SEC’s request for an asset freeze and issued a temporary restraining order. In the case of eAdGear, that order bars the defendants from soliciting investors, including through websites they have used until now – <a href="http://www.sec.gov/servlet/Satellite/goodbye/PressRelease/1370543050577?externalLink=http://www.eadgear.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">www.eadgear.com</a>, <a href="http://www.sec.gov/servlet/Satellite/goodbye/PressRelease/1370543050577?externalLink=http://www.eadgear.net" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">www.eadgear.net</a>, <a href="http://www.sec.gov/servlet/Satellite/goodbye/PressRelease/1370543050577?externalLink=http://www.winteam777.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">www.winteam777.com</a>, and <a href="http://www.sec.gov/servlet/Satellite/goodbye/PressRelease/1370543050577?externalLink=http://www.winteam168.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">www.winteam168.com</a>. A court hearing has been scheduled for October 10, 2014.</p>


<p><strong>Contact Us:</strong></p>


<p>With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of elder abuse, exploitation and securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation.</p>


<p>At the Fort Lauderdale Law Office of Russell L. Forkey, we represent clients throughout South and Central Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Sunrise, Plantation, Coral Springs, Deerfield Beach, Pompano Beach, Delray, Boynton Beach, Hollywood, Lake Worth, Royal Palm Beach, Manalapan, Jupiter, Gulf Stream, Wellington, Fort Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jupiter, Miami, Orlando, Maitland, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Heathrow, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa Beach, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormand Beach, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Dade County, Orange County, Seminole County, Martin County, Brevard County, Indian River County, Volusia County and Monroe County, Florida. The law office of Russell L. Forkey also represents South American, Canadian and other foreign residents that do business with U.S. financial institutions, investment advisors, brokerage and precious metal firms.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Annuity and Insurance Fraud and Misrepresentation – Boca Raton, West Palm Beach and Fort Lauderdale, Florida Litigation and Arbitration Attorney]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/annuity_and_insurance_fraud_and_misrepresentation_-_boca_raton_west_palm_beach_and_fort_lauderdale_f/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/annuity_and_insurance_fraud_and_misrepresentation_-_boca_raton_west_palm_beach_and_fort_lauderdale_f/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2014 11:39:03 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Affinity Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Annuity]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Commercial and Business Dispute Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Elder Abuse]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[False and Misleading Sales Material]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Federal Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[FINRA Arbitration]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Fraud and Misrepresentation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Insurance Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Insurance Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Insurance News]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[News of Interest to Seniors]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions 2014]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities and Securities Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[State Litigation]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Annuity and Insurance Fraud and Misrepresentation – Elder Financial Abuse and Exploitation Litigation and Arbitration Attorney: SEC Charges Four Insurance Agents in Securities Fraud Targeting Elderly Investors The Securities and Exchange Commission recently announced charges against four insurance agents for unlawfully selling securities in what turned out to be a multi-million dollar offering fraud targeting&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Annuity and Insurance Fraud and Misrepresentation – Elder Financial Abuse and Exploitation Litigation and Arbitration Attorney:</h2>


<p><strong>SEC Charges Four Insurance Agents in Securities Fraud Targeting Elderly Investors</strong></p>


<p>The Securities and Exchange Commission recently announced charges against four insurance agents for unlawfully selling securities in what turned out to be a multi-million dollar offering fraud targeting elderly investors.</p>


<p>The <a href="http://www.sec.gov/News/PressRelease/Detail/PressRelease/1370540397404" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">SEC previously charged a Colorado man</a> who allegedly orchestrated the scheme and recruited active insurance agents to help him solicit investors in Colorado and several other states. The scheme raised approximately $4.3 million during a nearly 18-month period. The SEC’s investigation further found that the four insurance agents charged today solicited funds without registering with the SEC as a broker-dealer as required under the federal securities laws.</p>


<p>“When individuals act as a broker and sell securities to the public, they must comply with registration, supervision, and compliance requirements that exist to protect investors,” said Julie K. Lutz, Director of the SEC’s Denver Regional Office. “These insurance agents improperly operated outside of that regulatory framework and thereby placed their clients at risk.”</p>


<p>According to the SEC’s order instituting administrative proceedings, the scheme primarily targeted retired annuity holders by using insurance agents to sell interests in a company called Arete LLC, which was controlled by the Colorado man orchestrating the scheme: Gary Snisky. The insurance agents told investors that their funds would be used by Snisky to purchase government-backed agency bonds at a discount. However, Snisky did not purchase bonds or conduct any such trading, and he misappropriated approximately $2.8 million of investor funds to pay commissions and make personal mortgage payments.</p>


<p>The SEC’s Enforcement Division alleges that the following three brokers raised approximately $1.5 million for Snisky and received almost $90,000 in commissions:</p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Kenneth C. Meissner of Fair Oaks Branch, Texas</li>
<li>James Doug Scott of Perkasie, Penn.</li>
<li>Mark S. “Mike” Tomich of Belmont, Mich.</li>
</ul>


<p>The other insurance agent – David C. Sorrells of Linden, Texas – entered into a cooperation agreement with the SEC. Without admitting or denying the findings, Sorrells consented to an order finding that he violated Section 15(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. He agreed to be barred from the securities industry, cease and desist from future violations of Section 15(a), and pay disgorgement of $207,213.34. He also is subject to an additional financial penalty. The settlement reflects substantial assistance that Sorrells provided in the SEC’s investigation.</p>


<p>The SEC’s Enforcement Division alleges that Meissner, Scott, and Tomich violated Section 15(a) of the Exchange Act, and is seeking disgorgement, penalties, and securities industry bars in the matter, which will be litigated before an administrative law judge. The SEC’s case against Snisky, filed in November 2013, is still pending in federal court in Colorado.</p>


<p><strong>Contact Us:</strong></p>


<p>With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of elder abuse, exploitation and securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation.</p>


<p>At the Fort Lauderdale Law Office of Russell L. Forkey, we represent clients throughout South and Central Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Sunrise, Plantation, Coral Springs, Deerfield Beach, Pompano Beach, Delray, Boynton Beach, Hollywood, Lake Worth, Royal Palm Beach, Manalapan, Jupiter, Gulf Stream, Wellington, Fort Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jupiter, Miami, Orlando, Maitland, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Heathrow, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa Beach, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormand Beach, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Dade County, Orange County, Seminole County, Martin County, Brevard County, Indian River County, Volusia County and Monroe County, Florida. The law office of Russell L. Forkey also represents South American, Canadian and other foreign residents that do business with U.S. financial institutions, investment advisors, brokerage and precious metal firms.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[South Florida Elder and Retirement Financial Abuse and Exploitation FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/south_florida_elder_and_retirement_financial_abuse_and_exploitation_finra_arbitration_and_litigation/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/south_florida_elder_and_retirement_financial_abuse_and_exploitation_finra_arbitration_and_litigation/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2014 21:54:01 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[AAA Arbitration]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Affinity Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Breach of Fiduciary Duty]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Broker/Dealer]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Churning]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Commercial and Business Dispute Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Elder Abuse]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Federal Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[FINRA Arbitration]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Fraud and Misrepresentation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[News of Interest to Seniors]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions 2014]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities and Securities Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[State Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Theft]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Unauthorized Trading]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Unsuitable Investment Recommendations]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Fort Lauderdale, Boca Raton, Delray Beach, Lantana, Lake Worth and West Palm Beach, Florida Elder Financial Abuse and Exploitation Litigation and FINRA Arbitration Attorney: SEC Charges Virginia-Based Broker With Stealing Funds From Elderly Customers The Securities and Exchange Commission recently charged a broker based in Roanoke, Va., with defrauding elderly customers, including some who are&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Fort Lauderdale, Boca Raton, Delray Beach, Lantana, Lake Worth and West Palm Beach, Florida Elder Financial Abuse and Exploitation Litigation and FINRA Arbitration Attorney:</h2>


<p><strong>SEC Charges Virginia-Based Broker With Stealing Funds From Elderly Customers</strong></p>


<p>The Securities and Exchange Commission recently charged a broker based in Roanoke, Va., with defrauding elderly customers, including some who are legally blind, by stealing their funds for her personal use and falsifying their account statements to cover up her fraud.</p>


<p>According to the SEC’s complaint filed in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia, Donna Jessee Tucker siphoned $730,289 from elderly customers and used the money to pay for such personal expenses as vacations, vehicles, clothes, and a country club membership. Tucker ensured that the customers received their monthly account statements electronically, knowing that they were unable or unwilling to access their statements in that format. The SEC further alleges that Tucker engaged in unauthorized trading and other financial transactions while making misrepresentations to customers about their investment accounts and forging brokerage, banking, and other documents.</p>


<p>The SEC’s investigation resulted from a broker-dealer examination of the firm where Tucker worked that was conducted by the SEC’s Philadelphia Regional Office.</p>


<p>In a parallel action, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Western District of Virginia announced criminal charges against Tucker.</p>


<p>Tucker has agreed to settle the SEC’s charges and disgorge the $730,289 in ill-gotten gains either in the criminal case or the civil case. She consented to the entry of an order permanently enjoining her from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 as well as Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5. The settlement is subject to court approval.</p>


<p><strong>Contact Us:</strong></p>


<p>With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of elder abuse, exploitation and securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation.</p>


<p>At the Fort Lauderdale Law Office of Russell L. Forkey, we represent clients throughout South and Central Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Sunrise, Plantation, Coral Springs, Deerfield Beach, Pompano Beach, Delray, Boynton Beach, Hollywood, Lake Worth, Royal Palm Beach, Manalapan, Jupiter, Gulf Stream, Wellington, Fort Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jupiter, Miami, Orlando, Maitland, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Heathrow, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa Beach, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormand Beach, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Dade County, Orange County, Seminole County, Martin County, Brevard County, Indian River County, Volusia County and Monroe County, Florida. The law office of Russell L. Forkey also represents South American, Canadian and other foreign residents that do business with U.S. financial institutions, investment advisors, brokerage and precious metal firms.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Boiler Room and Securities Fraud and Misrepresentation – Boca Raton, West Palm Beach and Fort Lauderdale, Florida Litigation and Arbitration Attorney]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/boiler_room_and_securities_fraud_and_misrepresentation_-_boca_raton_west_palm_beach_and_fort_lauderd/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/boiler_room_and_securities_fraud_and_misrepresentation_-_boca_raton_west_palm_beach_and_fort_lauderd/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2014 21:22:04 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[AAA Arbitration]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Boiler Room Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Commercial and Business Dispute Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Elder Abuse]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Federal Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[FINRA Arbitration]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Fraud and Misrepresentation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[News of Interest to Seniors]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Ponzi Scheme News]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Sales of Unregistered Securities]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions 2014]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities and Securities Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Boiler Room and Securities Fraud and Misrepresentation Litigation and Arbitration Attorney – West Palm Beach, Boca Raton and Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Securities and Exchange Commission v. DDBO Consulting, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 0:14-cv-61685-MGC (S.D. F.L.) Securities and Exchange Commission v. CalPacific Equity Group, LLC, et al., Civil Action No. 2:14-cv-05754-JFW-AGR (C.D. C.A.) SEC&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Boiler Room and Securities Fraud and Misrepresentation Litigation and Arbitration Attorney – West Palm Beach, Boca Raton and Fort Lauderdale, Florida.</h2>


<p><strong><em>Securities and Exchange Commission v. DDBO Consulting, Inc., et al.</em>, Civil Action No. 0:14-cv-61685-MGC (S.D. F.L.)</strong></p>


<p><strong><em>Securities and Exchange Commission v. CalPacific Equity Group, LLC, et al.</em>, Civil Action No. 2:14-cv-05754-JFW-AGR (C.D. C.A.)</strong></p>


<p><strong>SEC Charges Ddbo Consulting, Inc., Calpacific Equity Group, LLC, and Principals with Fraud and Registration Violations</strong></p>


<p>The Securities and Exchange Commission (Commission) recently announced that on July 24, 2014, it filed civil actions in U.S. District Court against individuals and companies behind a boiler room scheme that hyped a company whose new technology was purportedly to be used in the Super Bowl.  The SEC previously charged the operators of the scheme based in the South Florida and Los Angeles areas.  Seniors and other investors were pressured into purchasing stock in Thought Development Inc. (TDI), an unaffiliated Miami Beach-based company that stated its signature invention is a laser-line system that generates a green line on a football field for a first-down marker visible not only on television but also to players, officials, and fans in the stadium.</p>


<p>The SEC charged four executives who helped make the scheme possible and three companies they operate – DDBO Consulting, Inc., DBBG Consulting, Inc., and CalPacific Equity Group, LLC.  Approximately $1.7 million was raised through these companies from more than 110 investors who were told that an initial public offering (IPO) in TDI was imminent and that their money would be used to develop the ground-breaking technology.  Instead, the SEC alleges that the IPO was not forthcoming as promised, and at least 50 percent of the offering proceeds were merely retained by these companies or paid to sales agents through undisclosed commissions and fees. Certain executives, their sales agents and their companies lured investors by misrepresenting that TDI’s technology was about to be used by the National Football League (NFL).  One investor even made an additional $75,000 investment on top of an initial $2,500 investment after being told that NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell purchased TDI’s technology for use in the 2013 Super Bowl. In fact, there was no such arrangement.</p>


<p>In addition to the their companies, the SEC’s complaints charge brothers Dean R. Baker of Coral Springs, Fla., and Daniel R. Baker of Valley Village, Calif., along with Bret A. Grove of Delray Beach, Fla., and Demosthenes Dritsas of Newhall, Calif. The SEC’s complaints allege violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 as well as Sections 10(b) and 15(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5. The defendants all agreed to settle the SEC’s charges. In parallel actions, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California announced criminal charges against Daniel Baker and Dritsas, and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida announced criminal charges against Dean Baker and Grove.</p>


<p><strong>Contact Us:</strong></p>


<p>With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of elder abuse, exploitation and securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation.</p>


<p>At the Fort Lauderdale Law Office of Russell L. Forkey, we represent clients throughout South and Central Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Sunrise, Plantation, Coral Springs, Deerfield Beach, Pompano Beach, Delray, Boynton Beach, Hollywood, Lake Worth, Royal Palm Beach, Manalapan, Jupiter, Gulf Stream, Wellington, Fort Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jupiter, Miami, Orlando, Maitland, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Heathrow, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa Beach, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormand Beach, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Dade County, Orange County, Seminole County, Martin County, Brevard County, Indian River County, Volusia County and Monroe County, Florida. The law office of Russell L. Forkey also represents South American, Canadian and other foreign residents that do business with U.S. financial institutions, investment advisors, brokerage and precious metal firms.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Investment Advisory Conflict of Interest – West Palm Beach, Florida Investment Advisor Conflict of Interest Attorney]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/investment_advisory_conflict_of_interest_-_west_palm_beach_florida_investment_advisor_conflict_of_in/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/investment_advisory_conflict_of_interest_-_west_palm_beach_florida_investment_advisor_conflict_of_in/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2014 16:04:09 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Breach of Fiduciary Duty]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Commercial and Business Dispute Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Elder Abuse]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Federal Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[FINRA]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[FINRA Arbitration]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Investment Advisor]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Mutual Fund Fraud and Mismanagement]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[News of Interest to Seniors]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions 2014]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities and Securities Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>South Florida, including West Palm Beach and Boca Raton Investment Advisor Conflict of Interest FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney: Houston-Based Investment Advisory Firm and Co-Owners Charged With Failing to Disclose Conflict of Interest to Clients The Securities and Exchange Commission recently announced fraud charges against a Houston-based investment advisory firm accused of recommending that clients&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p><strong>South Florida, including West Palm Beach and Boca Raton Investment Advisor Conflict of Interest FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney:</strong></p>


<p><strong>Houston-Based Investment Advisory Firm and Co-Owners Charged With Failing to Disclose Conflict of Interest to Clients</strong></p>


<p>The Securities and Exchange Commission recently announced fraud charges against a Houston-based investment advisory firm accused of recommending that clients invest in particular mutual funds without disclosing a key conflict of interest: the firm was in turn receiving compensation from the broker offering the funds.</p>


<p>An SEC Enforcement Division investigation found that Robare Group Ltd. received a percentage of every dollar that its clients invested in certain mutual funds through an undisclosed compensation agreement with the brokerage firm. Therefore, unbeknownst to investors, Robare Group and its co-owners Mark L. Robare and Jack L. Jones Jr. had an incentive to recommend these funds to clients over other investment opportunities and generate additional revenue for the firm. Robare Group ultimately received approximately $440,000 in such payments from the brokerage firm during an eight-year period.</p>


<p>“Payments to investment advisers for recommending certain types of investments may taint their ability to provide impartial advice to their clients,” said Marshall S. Sprung, co-chief of the SEC Enforcement Division’s Asset Management Unit. “By failing to fully disclose its agreements with the brokerage firm, Robare Group deprived its clients of important information they were entitled to receive.”</p>


<p>The Asset Management Unit has undertaken an enforcement initiative to shed more light on undisclosed compensation arrangements between investment advisers and brokers. For example, the <a href="http://www.sec.gov/News/PressRelease/Detail/PressRelease/1365171484512" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">SEC previously charged an Oregon-based investment adviser</a> for failing to disclose revenue sharing payments and other conflicts of interest to clients.</p>


<p>According to the SEC’s order instituting administrative proceedings against Robare Group and its co-owners, the firm revised its Form ADV in December 2011 to disclose the compensation agreement, but this and later disclosures falsely stated that the firm did not receive any economic benefit from a non-client for providing investment advice. The disclosures also were inadequate because they stated that Robare Group may receive compensation from the broker when in fact the firm was definitively receiving payments.</p>


<p>The SEC Enforcement Division further alleges that Robare Group and the broker entered into a new agreement in late 2012 that provided similar payments. But it wasn’t until June 2013 that the firm disclosed the conflict of interest associated with its arrangement with the broker, and even then it failed to disclose the incentive to recommend buying and holding certain mutual funds through the broker’s platform or the magnitude of the conflict. Robare reviewed and approved the Forms ADV, and Jones reviewed and signed all but one of the filings.</p>


<p>The SEC’s Enforcement Division alleges that Robare Group and Robare willfully violated Sections 206(1) and 206(2) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and Jones aided and abetted these violations. The Enforcement Division further alleges that Robare Group, Robare, and Jones each willfully violated Section 207 of the Advisers Act.</p>


<p><strong>Contact Us:</strong></p>


<p>With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of elder abuse, exploitation and securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation.</p>


<p>At the Fort Lauderdale Law Office of Russell L. Forkey, we represent clients throughout South and Central Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Sunrise, Plantation, Coral Springs, Deerfield Beach, Pompano Beach, Delray, Boynton Beach, Hollywood, Lake Worth, Royal Palm Beach, Manalapan, Jupiter, Gulf Stream, Wellington, Fort Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jupiter, Miami, Orlando, Maitland, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Heathrow, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa Beach, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormand Beach, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Dade County, Orange County, Seminole County, Martin County, Brevard County, Indian River County, Volusia County and Monroe County, Florida. The law office of Russell L. Forkey also represents South American, Canadian and other foreign residents that do business with U.S. financial institutions, investment advisors, brokerage and precious metal firms.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Chimera Energy – IPO, Penny Stock and Microcap Fraud and Misrepresentation South Florida FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/chimera_energy_-_ipo_penny_stock_and_microcap_fraud_and_misrepresentation_south_florida_finra_arbitr/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/chimera_energy_-_ipo_penny_stock_and_microcap_fraud_and_misrepresentation_south_florida_finra_arbitr/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2014 14:31:42 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Commercial and Business Dispute Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Elder Abuse]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Federal Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[FINRA Arbitration]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Fraud and Misrepresentation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[News of Interest to Seniors]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions 2014]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities and Securities Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[State Litigation]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Microcap, Penny Stock and IPO Fraud and Misrepresentation Pump and Dump Scheme Litigation and Arbitration Attorney: SEC Announces Charges in Houston-Based Scheme Touting Technology to End Fracking The Securities and Exchange Commission recently announced charges against a Houston-based penny stock company and four individuals behind a pump-and-dump scheme that misled investors to believe the company&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p><strong>Microcap, Penny Stock and IPO Fraud and Misrepresentation Pump and Dump Scheme Litigation and Arbitration Attorney:</strong></p>


<p><strong>SEC Announces Charges in Houston-Based Scheme Touting Technology to End Fracking</strong></p>


<p>The Securities and Exchange Commission recently announced charges against a Houston-based penny stock company and four individuals behind a pump-and-dump scheme that misled investors to believe the company was on the brink of developing revolutionary technology to enable environmentally friendly oil-and-gas production.</p>


<p>The SEC alleges that Andrew I. Farmer orchestrated the scheme by creating a shell company called Chimera Energy, secretly obtaining control of all shares issued in an initial public offering (IPO) in late 2011, and launching an aggressive promotional campaign midway through 2012 to hype the stock to investors. Chimera Energy issued around three dozen press releases in a two-month period about its supposed licensing and development of technology to extract shale oil without the perceived environmental impact of hydraulic fracturing known as fracking. However, Chimera Energy did not actually license or even possess the technology it touted and had not achieved the claimed results in commercially developing it. While the stock was being pumped by the false claims, entities controlled by Farmer dumped more than 6 million shares on the public markets for illicit proceeds of more than $4.5 million.</p>


<p>The SEC suspended trading in Chimera Energy stock in 2012 and prevented Farmer and his associates from dumping additional shares or misleading new investors into their scheme.</p>


<p>In addition to Chimera Energy and Farmer, the SEC’s complaint charges a pair of figurehead CEOs installed by Farmer. The SEC alleges that Charles E. Grob Jr. and Baldemar Rios approved the misleading press releases and operated Chimera Energy at the minimum level necessary to lend the company a veneer of legitimacy while concealing Farmer’s involvement altogether. The SEC’s complaint also charges Carolyn Austin with helping Farmer profit from his scheme by dumping shares of Chimera Energy stock in the midst of the promotional efforts.</p>


<p>According to the SEC’s complaint filed in federal court in Houston, Farmer obtained control of all 5 million shares of Chimera Energy stock issued in the IPO by disguising his ownership through the use of nominee shareholders. Farmer’s name and the nature of his control over the company were not disclosed to investors in any of Chimera Energy’s public filings. Following the IPO, Farmer directed the press release barrage along with an Internet advertising campaign designed to increase investor awareness of Chimera Energy’s claims. The initial press release issued by the company on July 30, 2012, sported the headline: <em>CHMR Unveils Breakthrough Shale Oil Extraction Method to Safely and Effectively Replace Hydraulic Fracturing</em>.</p>


<p>The SEC alleges that Chimera Energy disclosed in public filings that an entity named China Inland had granted the company an “exclusive license to develop and commercialize cutting edge technologies related to Non-Hydraulic Extraction.” The technology that China Inland purportedly licensed to Chimera Energy was described as an “environmentally friendly oil & gas extraction procedure for shale to replace hydraulic fracturing.” The SEC’s investigation found that the purported acquisition of a license to develop such technology and the license agreement itself are entirely fictitious. No legitimate entity known as China Inland even exists.</p>


<p>The SEC’s complaint charges Chimera Energy, Farmer, Grob, Rios, and Austin with securities fraud, registration violations, and reporting violations. The SEC seeks permanent injunctions, disgorgement with prejudgment interest and financial penalties, penny stock bars, and officer-and-director bars.</p>


<p><strong>Contact Us:</strong></p>


<p>With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of elder abuse, exploitation and securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation.</p>


<p>At the Fort Lauderdale Law Office of Russell L. Forkey, we represent clients throughout South and Central Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Sunrise, Plantation, Coral Springs, Deerfield Beach, Pompano Beach, Delray, Boynton Beach, Hollywood, Lake Worth, Royal Palm Beach, Manalapan, Jupiter, Gulf Stream, Wellington, Fort Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jupiter, Miami, Orlando, Maitland, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Heathrow, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa Beach, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormand Beach, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Dade County, Orange County, Seminole County, Martin County, Brevard County, Indian River County, Volusia County and Monroe County, Florida. The law office of Russell L. Forkey also represents South American, Canadian and other foreign residents that do business with U.S. financial institutions, investment advisors, brokerage and precious metal firms.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Securities, Including Stocks and Bonds Custodian Fraud, Mismanagement and Misrepresentation FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/securities_including_stocks_and_bonds_custodian_fraud_mismanagement_and_misrepresentation_finra_arbi/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/securities_including_stocks_and_bonds_custodian_fraud_mismanagement_and_misrepresentation_finra_arbi/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2014 14:24:06 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Breach of Contract]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Breach of Fiduciary Duty]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Commercial and Business Dispute Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Corporate Misconduct]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Elder Abuse]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Federal Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[FINRA Arbitration]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Fraud and Misrepresentation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Other Types of Fraudulent Activity]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions 2014]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities and Securities Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Securities, Including Stocks and Bonds Custodian Fraud, Mismanagement and Misrepresentation FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney: Securities and Exchange Commission v. Julian R. Brown and Alliance Investment Management Limited, Civil Action No. 14-CV-6130 (N.D. Ill., filed August 8, 2014) SEC Charges Bahamas-Based Brokerage Firm and President with Facilitating Fraudulent Scheme by Hedge Fund Manager The Securities&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p><strong>Securities, Including Stocks and Bonds Custodian Fraud, Mismanagement and Misrepresentation FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney:</strong></p>


<p><strong><em>Securities and Exchange Commission v. Julian R. Brown and Alliance Investment Management Limited</em>, Civil Action No. 14-CV-6130 (N.D. Ill., filed August 8, 2014)</strong></p>


<p><strong>SEC Charges Bahamas-Based Brokerage Firm and President with Facilitating Fraudulent Scheme by Hedge Fund Manager</strong></p>


<p>The Securities and Exchange Commission recently charged a Bahamas-based brokerage firm and its president for enabling a fraud that was halted when the SEC charged the hedge fund manager at the center of the scheme.</p>


<p>The SEC alleges that Julian R. Brown and his firm Alliance Investment Management Limited (AIM) purported to be the “custodian” for assets under the management of Nikolai Battoo. The SEC obtained a court-ordered freeze over Battoo’s assets after <a href="http://www.sec.gov/News/PressRelease/Detail/PressRelease/1365171484640" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">charging him in 2012 with defrauding investors</a> around the world by hiding major losses while falsely boasting that their investments were performing remarkably during the financial crisis.</p>


<p>According to the SEC’s complaint against Brown and AIM in federal court in Chicago, they misrepresented themselves to investors as Battoo’s custodian when, since at least 2009, their firm did not have custody of most of the assets listed on investor account statements. Brown and AIM allowed Battoo to create false account statements on AIM letterhead that vastly overstated the value of investors’ assets by more than $150 million. Brown and AIM then routinely provided the false account statements to auditors and others acting on behalf of Battoo’s investors.</p>


<p>The SEC further alleges that Brown and AIM permitted Battoo to misappropriate at least $45 million of investor funds by transferring money at Battoo’s behest from investor accounts to Battoo’s direct control. Battoo used investor funds to pay AIM and Brown more than $5 million in return for their critical assistance.</p>


<p>The SEC’s complaint alleges that Brown and AIM violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5, and aided and abetted Battoo’s violations of the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws.</p>


<p><strong>Contact Us:</strong></p>


<p>With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of elder abuse, exploitation and securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation.</p>


<p>At the Fort Lauderdale Law Office of Russell L. Forkey, we represent clients throughout South and Central Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Sunrise, Plantation, Coral Springs, Deerfield Beach, Pompano Beach, Delray, Boynton Beach, Hollywood, Lake Worth, Royal Palm Beach, Manalapan, Jupiter, Gulf Stream, Wellington, Fort Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jupiter, Miami, Orlando, Maitland, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Heathrow, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa Beach, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormand Beach, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Dade County, Orange County, Seminole County, Martin County, Brevard County, Indian River County, Volusia County and Monroe County, Florida. The law office of Russell L. Forkey also represents South American, Canadian and other foreign residents that do business with U.S. financial institutions, investment advisors, brokerage and precious metal firms.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Microcap and Penny Stock South Florida Litigation and Arbitration Attorney]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/microcap_and_penny_stock_south_florida_litigation_and_arbitration_attorney/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/microcap_and_penny_stock_south_florida_litigation_and_arbitration_attorney/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2014 14:12:32 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Commercial and Business Dispute Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Elder Abuse]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Federal Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[FINRA Arbitration]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Fraud and Misrepresentation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Penny Stock Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions 2014]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[State Litigation]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Microcap and Penny Stock South Florida Litigation and Arbitration Attorney: Securities and Exchange Commission v. BIH Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 2:10-CV-577-FTM-29DNF (M.D. FL) Jury Finds Orchestrator of Microcap Stock Pump-And-Dump Scheme Liable in SEC Enforcement Case A federal court jury in Fort Myers, Fla., returned a unanimous verdict on August 8 finding Edward&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p><strong>Microcap and Penny Stock South Florida Litigation and Arbitration Attorney:</strong></p>


<p><strong><em>Securities and Exchange Commission v. BIH Corporation, et al.</em>, Civil Action No. 2:10-CV-577-FTM-29DNF (M.D. FL)</strong></p>


<p><strong>Jury Finds Orchestrator of Microcap Stock Pump-And-Dump Scheme Liable in SEC Enforcement Case</strong></p>


<p>A federal court jury in Fort Myers, Fla., returned a unanimous verdict on August 8 finding Edward W. Hayter of Brooklyn, N.Y., liable for five counts of violating the federal securities laws in connection with a scheme to pump up the stock of a microcap corporation purportedly headquartered in Fort Myers in which Hayter profited by approximately $500,000. Hayter was the lone remaining defendant in the SEC’s enforcement case filed in 2010.</p>


<p>Evidence at the trial showed that among other things, press releases that Hayter and BIH issued in 2008 and 2009 falsely claimed BIH was purchasing a restaurant services corporation that purportedly had contracts with such major corporations as Citi Field and Applebee’s Restaurants. Other evidence showed that in order to hide his involvement in the scheme, Hayter and others created a fictitious businessman named Cris Galo who was allegedly an accomplished entrepreneur running BIH. Evidence showed all of BIH’s contact information traced back to Hayter and an associate in New York, with the Fort Myers office being only a mail drop. Trading records showed the false press releases contributed to BIH’s stock rising more than 2,700 percent in a matter of months, allowing colleagues of Hayter to sell stock and funnel approximately $500,000 in proceeds to his own corporations.</p>


<p>The SEC filed its complaint against Hayter, BIH, Wayne A. Burmaster Jr. on Sept. 20, 2010, alleging that they had engaged in fraud and illegal sales of securities. The SEC also alleged securities registration violations by Christopher L. Astrom and his company Bimini Reef Real Estate Inc., Damian B. Guthrie and his company Riverview Capital Inc., and Burmaster’s company North Bay South Corporation. The SEC named Baron International Inc., Beaver Creek Financial Corporation, and The Caddo Corporation as relief defendants.</p>


<p>According to the SEC’s complaint, Burmaster and Hayter released false information about BIH’s operations and business relationships, the company’s stock and dividend payments, and the identity of the individuals directing BIH’s affairs. The SEC alleged that as part of the scheme, Burmaster and Hayter illegally distributed BIH’s stock to North Bay, Bimini Reef, and Riverview, and those entities then dumped more than $1 million of BIH’s stock and divided illegally obtained sales proceeds among the defendants and relief defendants.</p>


<p>On Oct. 25, 2010, the Honorable John E. Steele, United States District Court Judge for the Middle District of Florida, entered judgments of permanent injunction and other relief against Astrom and Bimini Reef Real Estate as well as Guthrie and Riverview Capital, enjoining them from violating Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act of 1933. In addition to injunctive relief, the judgments order them to pay disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and penalties in amounts to be determined at a later date. Astrom and Guthrie are barred from participating in the offering of any penny stock. They consented to the entry of the judgments without admitting or denying the allegations in the complaint.</p>


<p>On Sept. 26, 2012, the court entered a default judgment against BIH and North Bay South Corporation and relief defendants The Caddo Corporation and Beaver Creek Financial, ordering disgorgement with a penalty against BIH and North Bay South Corporation to be determined at a later date. On Dec. 17, 2012, the court entered a default judgment against Baron International.</p>


<p>On July 14, 2014, the court entered a default judgment of permanent injunction and other relief against Burmaster, enjoining him from violating Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5. In addition to injunctive relief, the judgment orders Burmaster to pay, jointly and severally, disgorgement and prejudgment interest of $1,349,158 and a penalty in an amount to be determined at a later date. Burmaster is barred from participating in the offering of any penny stock.</p>


<p><strong>Contact Us:</strong></p>


<p>With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of elder abuse, exploitation and securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation.</p>


<p>At the Fort Lauderdale Law Office of Russell L. Forkey, we represent clients throughout South and Central Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Sunrise, Plantation, Coral Springs, Deerfield Beach, Pompano Beach, Delray, Boynton Beach, Hollywood, Lake Worth, Royal Palm Beach, Manalapan, Jupiter, Gulf Stream, Wellington, Fort Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jupiter, Miami, Orlando, Maitland, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Heathrow, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa Beach, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormand Beach, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Dade County, Orange County, Seminole County, Martin County, Brevard County, Indian River County, Volusia County and Monroe County, Florida. The law office of Russell L. Forkey also represents South American, Canadian and other foreign residents that do business with U.S. financial institutions, investment advisors, brokerage and precious metal firms.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[John Thornes – South Florida Elder and Retirement Financial Abuse, Fraud and Breach of Fiduciary Duty FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/john_thornes_-_south_florida_elder_and_retirement_financial_abuse_fraud_and_breach_of_fiduciary_duty/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/john_thornes_-_south_florida_elder_and_retirement_financial_abuse_fraud_and_breach_of_fiduciary_duty/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2014 19:07:39 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Breach of Fiduciary Duty]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Broker/Dealer]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Commercial and Business Dispute Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Elder Abuse]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Federal Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[FINRA Arbitration]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Fraud and Misrepresentation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Investor Alerts]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[News of Interest to Seniors]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions 2014]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities and Securities Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Theft]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Boca Raton, Boynton Beach, Lake Worth, Delray Beach and Deerfield Beach, Florida Elder and Retirement Financial Abuse, Fraud and Breach of Fiduciary Duty FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney: Securities and Exchange Commission v. John Thornes, Defendant, and Christopher Burnell, Kyle Larick, and Doreen Thornes, Relief Defendants, Civil Action No. 14-cv-06088 (C.D. Cal.) SEC Charges California-Based&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p><strong>Boca Raton, Boynton Beach, Lake Worth, Delray Beach and Deerfield Beach, Florida Elder and Retirement Financial Abuse, Fraud and Breach of Fiduciary Duty FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney: </strong></p>


<p><strong><em>Securities and Exchange Commission v. John Thornes, Defendant, and Christopher Burnell, Kyle Larick, and Doreen Thornes, Relief Defendants</em>, Civil Action No. 14-cv-06088 (C.D. Cal.)</strong></p>


<p><strong>SEC Charges California-Based Broker with Stealing Money from Accounts</strong></p>


<p>The Securities and Exchange Commission recently charged a California-based broker with stealing $4.4 million from two trust brokerage accounts at his firm and diverting it to a pair of friends for uses ranging from gambling to chartering a private jet.</p>


<p>The SEC alleges that John T. Thornes of Redlands, Calif., formerly the sole owner of Thornes & Associates, Inc., diverted funds out of a brokerage account for a trust established for the health and welfare of an 80-year-old dementia patient who has been living at home for several years with 24-hour nurse care. Thornes also siphoned money out of a brokerage account for a trust set up to fund college scholarships for local high school graduates.</p>


<p>According to the SEC’s complaint filed in U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Thornes stole money from the two accounts from November 2010 to April 2013 primarily to benefit two of his friends, Christopher Burnell of Highland, Calif., and Kyle Larick of Redlands, Calif. Thornes has tried to pass off the payouts as loans, however there were no loan documents, no stated interest, and no collateral for the funds given. None of the money was ever repaid.</p>


<p>The SEC alleges that Thornes deceived his own mother with respect to the educational trust. She served as trustee, and he periodically asked her to sign blank checks that he then used in his misappropriation scheme. Thornes never informed his mother about trades he made, and he converted the brokerage account to a margin account even though it was designated as a low or minimal-risk tolerance account. He used the margin debt in his scheme and later sold securities from those accounts to avoid the margin calls. Thornes did the same thing with the brokerage account for the elderly dementia patient.</p>


<p>According to the SEC’s complaint, after Thornes liberally transferred money from the brokerage accounts to his friends, they used it to charter a private jet, buy a luxury car, and purchase a vacation home. Burnell also used the funds to gamble at a nearby casino or pay gambling debts. Thornes paid his mother about $84,000 in excess trustee fees.</p>


<p>Thornes has agreed to settle the charges and consented to the entry of a final judgment ordering him to pay disgorgement of $4,366,790, prejudgment interest of $278,540, and a penalty of $4,366,790. Without admitting or denying the SEC’s allegations, he agreed to be permanently enjoined from future violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 as well as Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5. Thornes also has agreed to consent to a collateral industry bar and a penny stock bar.</p>


<p>The SEC’s complaint also names Thornes’ friends Burnell and Larick as well as his mother Doreen Thornes as relief defendants for the purposes of recovering any illicit funds in their possession.</p>


<p><strong>Contact Us:</strong></p>


<p>With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of elder abuse, exploitation and securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation.</p>


<p>At the Fort Lauderdale Law Office of Russell L. Forkey, we represent clients throughout South and Central Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Sunrise, Plantation, Coral Springs, Deerfield Beach, Pompano Beach, Delray, Boynton Beach, Hollywood, Lake Worth, Royal Palm Beach, Manalapan, Jupiter, Gulf Stream, Wellington, Fort Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jupiter, Miami, Orlando, Maitland, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Heathrow, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa Beach, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormand Beach, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Dade County, Orange County, Seminole County, Martin County, Brevard County, Indian River County, Volusia County and Monroe County, Florida. The law office of Russell L. Forkey also represents South American, Canadian and other foreign residents that do business with U.S. financial institutions, investment advisors, brokerage and precious metal firms.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[CP Capital Securities, Inc. – Hollywood, Florida Improper Markup Corporate Bond FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/cp_capital_securities_inc_-_hollywood_florida_improper_markup_corporate_bond_finra_arbitration_and_l/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/cp_capital_securities_inc_-_hollywood_florida_improper_markup_corporate_bond_finra_arbitration_and_l/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2014 01:43:44 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Broker/Dealer]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Commercial and Business Dispute Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Elder Abuse]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Federal Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[FINRA Arbitration]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[FINRA Enforcement Actions]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[FINRA Enforcement Actions 2014]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Fraud and Misrepresentation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[News of Interest to Seniors]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities and Securities Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[State Litigation]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Hollywood, Dania, Fort Lauderdale, Pompano Beach and Deerfield Beach, Florida Improper Markup Corporate Bond FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney: The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (FINRA) is a self-regulatory authority assigned the responsibility, by the Securities and Exchange Commission, to license, regulate and discipline securities broker/dealers and their employees, including account executives. In the event&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Hollywood, Dania, Fort Lauderdale, Pompano Beach and Deerfield Beach, Florida Improper Markup Corporate Bond FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney:</h2>


<p>The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (FINRA) is a self-regulatory authority assigned the responsibility, by the Securities and Exchange Commission, to license, regulate and discipline securities broker/dealers and their employees, including account executives. In the event that FINRA elects to institute an enforcement action, firms and licensed individuals have the responsibility to reflect such action on their U-4 and/or U-5 filings, which can be viewed on the FINRA website under the broker-check section of the site or by viewing the monthly disciplinary information also provided on the FINRA site.</p>


<p>The monthly disciplinary information is referenced on the FINRA site generally in alphabetical order. This post relates to the following company or individuals. If the reader would like to review the entire FINRA release or the broker-check information concerning this matter, you can follow these highlighted links:</p>


<p><strong>July 2014 Disciplinary and Other FINRA Actions</strong></p>


<p><strong>Broker Check: </strong><a href="http://www.finra.org/Investors/ToolsCalculators/BrokerCheck/" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><strong>http://www.finra.org/Investors/ToolsCalculators/BrokerCheck/</strong></a></p>


<p><strong>CP Capital Securities, Inc. </strong>submitted a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent in which the firm was censured, fined $5,000 and ordered to pay $1,676.92, plus interest, in restitution to customers.  Without admitting or denying the findings, the firm consented to the sanctions and to the entry of findings that it bought corporate bonds from customers and failed to buy such bonds at a price that was fiar, taking into consideration all relevant circumstances, including market conditions with respect to each bond at the time of the transaction, the expense involved and that the firm was entitled to a profit.  To see a full copy of the release relative to this matter, please follow the above highlighted link. FINRA Case No. 2013035996801.</p>


<p><strong>Contact Us:</strong></p>


<p>With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of elder abuse, exploitation and securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation.</p>


<p>At the Fort Lauderdale Law Office of Russell L. Forkey, we represent clients throughout South and Central Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Sunrise, Plantation, Coral Springs, Deerfield Beach, Pompano Beach, Delray, Boynton Beach, Hollywood, Lake Worth, Royal Palm Beach, Manalapan, Jupiter, Gulf Stream, Wellington, Fort Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jupiter, Miami, Orlando, Maitland, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Heathrow, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa Beach, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormand Beach, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Dade County, Orange County, Seminole County, Martin County, Brevard County, Indian River County, Volusia County and Monroe County, Florida. The law office of Russell L. Forkey also represents South American, Canadian and other foreign residents that do business with U.S. financial institutions, investment advisors, brokerage and precious metal firms.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Robert G. Bard – South Florida Securities and Bank Fraud and Misrepresentation FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/robert_g_bard_-_south_florida_securities_and_bank_fraud_and_misrepresentation_finra_arbitration_and/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/robert_g_bard_-_south_florida_securities_and_bank_fraud_and_misrepresentation_finra_arbitration_and/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2014 01:33:59 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Commercial and Business Dispute Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Elder Abuse]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Federal Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[FINRA Arbitration]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Fraud and Misrepresentation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Investment Advisor]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Investor Alerts]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[News of Interest to Seniors]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions 2014]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities and Securities Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[State Litigation]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Boca Raton, Delray Beach, Boynton Beach, Lake Worth and West Palm Beach, Florida Investment Advisor Securities and Bank Fraud and Misrepresentation FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney: Securities and Exchange Commission v. Robert Glenn Bard, et al., Civil Action No. 1:09-cv-1473 (M.D. Pa.) Pennsylvania-Based Investment Adviser Charged in SEC and Criminal Actions Receives Prison Sentence A&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Boca Raton, Delray Beach, Boynton Beach, Lake Worth and West Palm Beach, Florida Investment Advisor Securities and Bank Fraud and Misrepresentation FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney:</h2>


<p><strong><em>Securities and Exchange Commission v. Robert Glenn Bard, et al.</em>, Civil Action No. 1:09-cv-1473 (M.D. Pa.)</strong></p>


<p><strong>Pennsylvania-Based Investment Adviser Charged in SEC and Criminal Actions Receives Prison Sentence</strong></p>


<p>A Pennsylvania-based investment adviser who was charged with fraud in an SEC enforcement action and later by criminal authorities has received a prison sentence of more than 21 years.</p>


<p>Robert G. Bard of Warfordsburg, Pa., was sentenced on July 31 by Sylvia H. Rambo of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. Bard had been found guilty by a jury and convicted of 21 counts of securities fraud, mail fraud, wire fraud, bank fraud, and making false statements for defrauding his investment advisory clients between December 2004 and August 2009. Judge Rambo sentenced Bard to 262 months imprisonment and ordered him to pay $4.2 million in restitution to 66 victims.</p>


<p>The criminal case, filed by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Pennsylvania on July 18, 2012, arose out of the same facts that were the subject of a civil injunctive action filed by the SEC on July 30, 2009. The Commission’s complaint alleged that defendant Bard, an investment adviser, and his solely-owned company Vision Specialist Group LLC had violated the federal securities laws through fraudulent misrepresentations regarding client investments, account performance and advisory fees, and by Bard’s creation of false client account statements, and forgery of client documents. On May 23, 2012, after granting summary judgment for the Commission, the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania entered a final judgment against Bard and Vision Specialist Group finding both violated § 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, § 10(b) of the Exchange Act of 1934, and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and §§ 206(1) and 206(2) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940. In that judgment, the court also entered permanent injunctions for violations of those provisions, and held Bard and Vision Specialist Group jointly and severally liable for disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and civil penalties totaling $3,003,039.</p>


<p><strong>Contact Us:</strong></p>


<p>With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of elder abuse, exploitation and securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation. </p>


<p>At the Fort Lauderdale Law Office of Russell L. Forkey, we represent clients throughout South and Central Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Sunrise, Plantation, Coral Springs, Deerfield Beach, Pompano Beach, Delray, Boynton Beach, Hollywood, Lake Worth, Royal Palm Beach, Manalapan, Jupiter, Gulf Stream, Wellington, Fort Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jupiter, Miami, Orlando, Maitland, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Heathrow, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa Beach, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormand Beach, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Dade County, Orange County, Seminole County, Martin County, Brevard County, Indian River County, Volusia County and Monroe County, Florida. The law office of Russell L. Forkey also represents South American, Canadian and other foreign residents that do business with U.S. financial institutions, investment advisors, brokerage and precious metal firms.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Registration of Dealers, Associated Persons and Investment Advisers in Florida – South Florida Securities Attorney]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/registration_of_dealers_associated_persons_and_investment_advisers_in_florida_-_south_florida_securi/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/registration_of_dealers_associated_persons_and_investment_advisers_in_florida_-_south_florida_securi/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2014 11:33:53 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Broker/Dealer]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Commercial and Business Dispute Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Elder Abuse]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Federal Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[FINRA]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[FINRA Arbitration]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[General Investment News]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Investment Advisor]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Investment Terms and Concepts]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Legal Terms and Concepts]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[News of Interest to Seniors]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities and Securities Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[State Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[State Regulatory Enforcement Actions]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Registration of Dealers, Associated Persons, and Investment Advisers in the State of Florida – South Florida Securities Attorney: Chaper 517.12 Fla.Stat. labeled Registration of dealers, associated persons, and investment advisers provides in relevant part that: (1) No dealer, associated person, or issuer of securities shall sell or offer for sale any securities in or from offices&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Registration of Dealers, Associated Persons, and Investment Advisers in the State of Florida – South Florida Securities Attorney:</h2>


<p>Chaper 517.12 Fla.Stat. labeled Registration of dealers, associated persons, and investment advisers provides in relevant part that:</p>


<p>(1) No dealer, associated person, or issuer of securities shall sell or offer for sale any securities in or from offices in this state, or sell securities to persons in this state from offices outside this state, by mail or otherwise, unless the person has been registered with the Department of Financial Regulation (“office”) pursuant to the provisions of this section. The office shall not register any person as an associated person of a dealer unless the dealer with which the applicant seeks registration is lawfully registered with the office pursuant to this chapter.</p>


<p>(2) The registration requirements of this section do not apply to the issuers of securities exempted by s. <a href="http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0500-0599/0517/Sections/0517.051.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">517.051</a>(1)-(8) and (10).</p>


<p>(3) Except as otherwise provided in s. <a href="http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0500-0599/0517/Sections/0517.061.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">517.061</a>(11)(a)4., (13), (16), (17), or  (19), the registration requirements of this section do not apply in a transaction exempted by s. <a href="http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0500-0599/0517/Sections/0517.061.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">517.061</a>(1)-(12), (14), and (15).</p>


<p>(4) No investment adviser or associated person of an investment adviser or federal covered adviser shall engage in business from offices in this state, or render investment advice to persons of this state, by mail or otherwise, unless the federal covered adviser has made a notice-filing with the office pursuant to s. <a href="http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0500-0599/0517/Sections/0517.1201.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">517.1201</a> or the investment adviser is registered pursuant to the provisions of this chapter and associated persons of the federal covered adviser or investment adviser have been registered with the office pursuant to this section. The office shall not register any person or an associated person of a federal covered adviser or an investment adviser unless the federal covered adviser or investment adviser with which the applicant seeks registration is in compliance with the notice-filing requirements of s. <a href="http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0500-0599/0517/Sections/0517.1201.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">517.1201</a> or is lawfully registered with the office pursuant to this chapter. A dealer or associated person who is registered pursuant to this section may render investment advice upon notification to and approval from the office.</p>


<p>(5) No dealer or investment adviser shall conduct business from a branch office within this state unless the branch office is notice-filed with the office pursuant to s. <a href="http://www.leg.state.fl.us/Statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=&URL=0500-0599/0517/Sections/0517.1202.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">517.1202</a>.</p>


<p>Please keep in mind that this information is being provided for educational purposes only.  It is not designed to be complete in all material respects.  Thus, it should not be relied upon as legal or investment advice.  If the reader has any questions concerning the contents of this post, you should contact a qualified professional.</p>


<p><strong>Contact Us:</strong></p>


<p>With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of elder abuse, exploitation and securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation.</p>


<p>At the Fort Lauderdale Law Office of Russell L. Forkey, we represent clients throughout South and Central Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Sunrise, Plantation, Coral Springs, Deerfield Beach, Pompano Beach, Delray, Boynton Beach, Hollywood, Lake Worth, Royal Palm Beach, Manalapan, Jupiter, Gulf Stream, Wellington, Fort Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jupiter, Miami, Orlando, Maitland, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Heathrow, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa Beach, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormand Beach, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Dade County, Orange County, Seminole County, Martin County, Brevard County, Indian River County, Volusia County and Monroe County, Florida. The law office of Russell L. Forkey also represents South American, Canadian and other foreign residents that do business with U.S. financial institutions, investment advisors, brokerage and precious metal firms.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Do CFPs Have to Register as an Investment Adviser in Florida – Delary, Deerfield Beach, Boca Raton and Boynton Beach, Florida FINRA Arbitration, Litigation and Elder Abuse Attorney]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/do_cfps_have_to_register_as_an_investment_adviser_in_florida_-_delary_deerfield_beach_boca_raton_and/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/do_cfps_have_to_register_as_an_investment_adviser_in_florida_-_delary_deerfield_beach_boca_raton_and/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2014 10:54:46 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Broker/Dealer]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Commercial and Business Dispute Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Elder Abuse]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Federal Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[FINRA Arbitration]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[General Investment News]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Investment Advisor]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Investment Terms and Concepts]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Investor Alerts]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Legal Terms and Concepts]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[News of Interest to Seniors]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Sales of Unregistered Securities]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities and Securities Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[State Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Unregistered Securities]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Do CFPs have to register as an Investment Adviser in Florida – Delray, Boynton Beach, Lantana, Boca Raton and West Palm Beach FINRA Arbitration, Litigation and Elder Abuse Attorney: Any person who for compensation refers, solicits, offers, or negotiates for the purchase or sale of investment advisory services is required to be registered in Florida,&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Do CFPs have to register as an Investment Adviser in Florida – Delray, Boynton Beach, Lantana, Boca Raton and West Palm Beach FINRA Arbitration, Litigation and Elder Abuse Attorney:</h2>


<p>Any person who for compensation refers, solicits, offers, or negotiates for the purchase or sale of investment advisory services is required to be registered in Florida, regardless of their professional designation as a Investment Adviser and/or Associated Person of a broker/dealer.</p>


<p>Please keep in mind that this information is being provided for informational purposes only.  It is not designed to be complete in all material respects.  Thus, it should not be relied upon as legal or investment advise.  If the reader has any questions relating to this post, you should contact a qualified professional.  </p>


<p><strong>Contact Us:</strong></p>


<p>With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of elder abuse, exploitation and securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation.</p>


<p>At the Fort Lauderdale Law Office of Russell L. Forkey, we represent clients throughout South and Central Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Sunrise, Plantation, Coral Springs, Deerfield Beach, Pompano Beach, Delray, Boynton Beach, Hollywood, Lake Worth, Royal Palm Beach, Manalapan, Jupiter, Gulf Stream, Wellington, Fort Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jupiter, Miami, Orlando, Maitland, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Heathrow, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa Beach, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormand Beach, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Dade County, Orange County, Seminole County, Martin County, Brevard County, Indian River County, Volusia County and Monroe County, Florida. The law office of Russell L. Forkey also represents South American, Canadian and other foreign residents that do business with U.S. financial institutions, investment advisors, brokerage and precious metal firms.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>