<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[Real Estate Investment Fraud - Russell L. Forkey]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/categories/real-estate-investment-fraud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/categories/real-estate-investment-fraud/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey's Website]]></description>
        <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2024 17:36:57 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        
        <language>en-us</language>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Carl Keith Battie – South Florida Real Estate Fraud Litigation and Arbitration Attorney]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/carl_keith_battie_-_south_florida_real_estate_fraud_litigation_and_arbitration_attorney/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/carl_keith_battie_-_south_florida_real_estate_fraud_litigation_and_arbitration_attorney/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2017 00:28:48 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Real Estate Investment Fraud]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>South Florida Real Estate Fraud Litigation and Arbitration Attorney. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Carl Keith Battie, No. 3:17-CV-01113-K (N.D. Tex filed Apr. 28, 2017) United States v. Carl Keith Battie, No. 3:16-CR-00051-D (N.D. Tex. filed October 24, 2016) SEC Announces Charges in Fraudulent Real Estate Investment Scheme The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<h2 class="wp-block-heading">South Florida Real Estate Fraud Litigation and Arbitration Attorney.</h2>


<p><em><strong>Securities and Exchange Commission v. Carl Keith Battie, No. 3:17-CV-01113-K (N.D. Tex filed Apr. 28, 2017)</strong></em></p>


<p><em><strong>United States v. Carl Keith Battie, No. 3:16-CR-00051-D (N.D. Tex. filed October 24, 2016)</strong></em></p>


<p><strong>SEC Announces Charges in Fraudulent Real Estate Investment Scheme</strong></p>


<p>The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that on April 28, 2017, it charged Carl Keith Battie with orchestrating a multiyear fraudulent real estate investment scam that victimized at least 70 investors.</p>


<p>According to the SEC’s complaint, filed in federal district court in Dallas, Texas, Battie, 59, a British citizen who resided in Decatur, Georgia until his arrest in January 2015, raised nearly $9 million between 2008 and 2014, through two investment programs tied to single and multi-family real estate. According to the SEC, Battie concealed his identity from investors by using a now-deceased Dallas-based pitchman to market the investments. But, the SEC alleges that Battie controlled the entire scheme behind the scenes, created most of the investment literature and slide presentations the pitchman used, and often spoke with investors by phone using aliases. The SEC alleges that Battie falsely described both investments as “Truly Passive and Guaranteed” and asserted that they would generate returns ranging from 16% to 35% per year. Offering materials further falsely claimed that Battie’s organization had a “team” of professionals operating thousands of properties. Investors in the second program were falsely told that they were buying so-called “mortgage notes,” which were promissory notes purportedly secured by residential real estate, at sharp discounts to the value of the properties securing them, which supposedly locked in “instant profit,” and that all payments on the note were guaranteed “regardless of any default” by the properties’ tenants or mortgagees.</p>


<p>But, as the SEC alleges, almost nothing told to investors was true. There was no “team” with thousands of properties; just Battie and a couple of administrative assistants, and fewer than 150 properties. And these properties bore little resemblance to those described in offering materials and sales pitches. Nearly all were highly distressed, having been acquired by Battie out of foreclosure. A few were superficially refurbished, but most were not improved at all. To provide the purported “instant profit” to mortgage note investors, Battie artificially inflated the apparent market value of the properties by repeatedly selling them back and forth between companies he controlled. To the extent any tenants occupied the properties, they were uniformly high-risk and low revenue, which forced Battie to rely on new investor funds to make Ponzi payments to earlier investors.</p>


<p>In a parallel federal criminal case, Battie has pleaded guilty to one charge of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, and has been sentenced to 10 years in prison and ordered to pay restitution of $11,402,794.47.</p>


<p>The SEC’s action charges Battie with violating Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. Battie has consented to a permanent injunction against future violations of all of these provisions. Battie is liable for disgorgement, plus prejudgment interest, of over $10 million, which is deemed satisfied by the criminal restitution order. The SEC is not imposing a civil penalty due to Battie’s prison sentence.</p>


<p><strong>Contact Us:</strong></p>


<p>With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of elder abuse, exploitation and securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation.</p>


<p>At the Boca Raton Law Office of Russell L. Forkey, we represent clients throughout South and Central Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Sunrise, Plantation, Coral Springs, Deerfield Beach, Pompano Beach, Delray, Boynton Beach, Hollywood, Lake Worth, Royal Palm Beach, Manalapan, Jupiter, Gulf Stream, Wellington, Fort Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jupiter, Miami, Orlando, Maitland, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Heathrow, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa Beach, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormand Beach, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Dade County, Orange County, Seminole County, Martin County, Brevard County, Indian River County, Volusia County and Monroe County, Florida. The law office of Russell L. Forkey also represents South American, Canadian and other foreign residents that do business with U.S. financial institutions, investment advisors, brokerage and precious metal firms.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[SEC Charges Business Owner and Stockbroker in Real Estate Offering Fraud]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/sec_charges_business_owner_and_stockbroker_in_real_estate_offering_fraud/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/sec_charges_business_owner_and_stockbroker_in_real_estate_offering_fraud/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 21:22:04 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Commercial and Business Dispute Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Real Estate Investment Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions 2014]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities and Securities Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Boca Raton, Florida Real Estate Investment and Offering Fraud FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney: SEC Charges Business Owner and Stockbroker in Maryland-Based Real Estate Offering Fraud The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged the owner of a Maryland-based real estate company with conducting an offering fraud and spending investor money on such personal expenses as&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Boca Raton, Florida Real Estate Investment and Offering Fraud FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney:</h2>


<p>SEC Charges Business Owner and Stockbroker in Maryland-Based Real Estate Offering Fraud</p>


<p>The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged the owner of a Maryland-based real estate company with conducting an offering fraud and spending investor money on such personal expenses as his mortgage, country club dues, and season tickets to the Baltimore Ravens. The agency also charged a former stockbroker for participating in the scheme.</p>


<p><strong><a href="../../../../Attorney-Profile/index.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><strong>Contact Us:</strong></a></strong></p>


<p>With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of elder abuse, exploitation and securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation.</p>


<p>At the Boca Raton Law Office of Russell L. Forkey, we represent clients throughout South and Central Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Sunrise, Plantation, Coral Springs, Deerfield Beach, Pompano Beach, Delray, Boynton Beach, Hollywood, Lake Worth, Royal Palm Beach, Manalapan, Jupiter, Gulf Stream, Wellington, Fort Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jupiter, Miami, Orlando, Maitland, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Heathrow, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa Beach, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormand Beach, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Dade County, Orange County, Seminole County, Martin County, Brevard County, Indian River County, Volusia County and Monroe County, Florida. The law office of Russell L. Forkey also represents South American, Canadian and other foreign residents that do business with U.S. financial institutions, investment advisors, brokerage and precious metal firms.</p>


<p><strong>SEC Charges Business Owner and Stockbroker in Maryland-Based Real Estate Offering Fraud</strong></p>


<p>The Securities and Exchange Commission recently charged the owner of a Maryland-based real estate company with conducting an offering fraud and spending investor money on such personal expenses as his mortgage, country club dues, and season tickets to the Baltimore Ravens. The agency also charged a former stockbroker for participating in the scheme.</p>


<p>The SEC alleges that Wilfred T. Azar III sold investors purported bonds in his company Empire Corporation, which he touted as a successful and profitable business with the resources to pay promised annual returns of 10 percent. Along with Joseph A. Giordano, Azar and his company raised more than $7 million by making these and other false and misleading statements exaggerating the safety and low risk of the bonds. However, Empire Corporation was functionally insolvent in reality, and despite saying investor funds would be used for various corporate purposes, Azar used the money to pay personal expenses as well as thousands of dollars in compensation to Giordano for participating in the fraud. Giordano also steered a mutual fund that he managed into purchasing the bonds despite knowing the company was nearly broke. The scheme collapsed when they were unable to recruit new investors to fund Empire Corporation’s operations and repay existing investors, who did not receive their promised returns and lost substantially all of their investments.</p>


<p>In a parallel case, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Maryland today announced criminal charges against Azar.</p>


<p>The SEC’s complaint filed in federal court in Baltimore charges Empire Corporation, Azar, and Giordano with violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 as well as Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5. The complaint also charges Giordano with violations of Sections 206(1), 206(2) and 206(4) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and Rule 206(4)-8 as well as Section 34(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940. The SEC seeks disgorgement plus prejudgment interest and penalties as well as permanent injunctions. The agency is seeking an officer-and-director bar against Azar.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Robert J. Vitale and Realty Acquisitions & Trust, Inc. – Florida Real Estate Investment Fraud, Misrepresentation and Mismanagement Litigation and Arbitration Attorney]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/robert_j_vitale_and_realty_acquisitions_trust_inc_-_florida_real_estate_investment_fraud_misrepresen/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/robert_j_vitale_and_realty_acquisitions_trust_inc_-_florida_real_estate_investment_fraud_misrepresen/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2014 10:21:25 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Breach of Contract]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Breach of Fiduciary Duty]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Commercial and Business Dispute Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Elder Abuse]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Federal Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[FINRA Arbitration]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Fraud and Misrepresentation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Real Estate Investment Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions 2014]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities and Securities Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>South Florida Real Estate Fraud, Misrepresentation and Mismanagement Litigation and Arbitration Attorney: SEC Charges Former Stock Promoter With Defrauding Investors in Florida Real Estate Venture The Securities and Exchange Commission recently filed fraud charges against a former Florida-based stock promoter currently serving a two-year prison sentence for lying to SEC investigators. The SEC’s complaint filed&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p><strong>South Florida Real Estate Fraud, Misrepresentation and Mismanagement Litigation and Arbitration Attorney:</strong></p>


<p><strong>SEC Charges Former Stock Promoter With Defrauding Investors in Florida Real Estate Venture</strong></p>


<p>The Securities and Exchange Commission recently filed fraud charges against a former Florida-based stock promoter currently serving a two-year prison sentence for lying to SEC investigators.</p>


<p>The SEC’s complaint filed in U.S. District Court in the Southern District of Florida alleges that Robert J. Vitale defrauded investors in a Florida real estate venture, sold unregistered securities, and acted as an unregistered broker-dealer. Vitale and his firm Realty Acquisitions & Trust Inc. raised at least $8.7 million from investors, including many senior citizens. Vitale allegedly told investors their funds were “100% protected” when they were not, and he claimed to be a financial expert with a business degree from Notre Dame when he never attended college after graduating from Notre Dame High School in West Haven, Conn.</p>


<p>The SEC alleges that although Vitale told investors his success rested on his “great honesty and integrity,” he failed to tell them that he was <a href="http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/lr18669.htm" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">charged by the SEC</a> in 2004 for participating in a pump-and-dump market manipulation scheme or that he later <a href="http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2006/lr19817.htm" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">settled the charges</a> and was barred from the brokerage industry as part of the settlement.</p>


<p>Vitale is now an inmate at the Federal Detention Center in Miami. He was sentenced in September 2013 after being convicted of obstruction of justice and providing false testimony in the SEC’s investigation that led to the charges filed today.</p>


<p>The SEC is seeking the return of allegedly ill-gotten gains with interest, a monetary penalty, and a permanent injunction against Vitale. The SEC’s complaint also charges Coral Springs Investment Group Inc. as a relief defendant, alleging the company holds assets that came from defrauded investors that should be returned.</p>


<p><strong>Contact Us:</strong></p>


<p>With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of elder abuse, exploitation and securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation.</p>


<p>At the Fort Lauderdale Law Office of Russell L. Forkey, we represent clients throughout South and Central Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Sunrise, Plantation, Coral Springs, Deerfield Beach, Pompano Beach, Delray, Boynton Beach, Hollywood, Lake Worth, Royal Palm Beach, Manalapan, Jupiter, Gulf Stream, Wellington, Fort Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jupiter, Miami, Orlando, Maitland, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Heathrow, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa Beach, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormand Beach, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Dade County, Orange County, Seminole County, Martin County, Brevard County, Indian River County, Volusia County and Monroe County, Florida. The law office of Russell L. Forkey also represents South American, Canadian and other foreign residents that do business with U.S. financial institutions, investment advisors, brokerage and precious metal firms.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Private Equity – Private Investment – Private Security – Florida Fraud, Misrepresentation and Mismanagement FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/private_equity_-_private_investment_-_private_security_-_florida_fraud_misrepresentation_and_mismana/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/private_equity_-_private_investment_-_private_security_-_florida_fraud_misrepresentation_and_mismana/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2013 10:03:38 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Broker/Dealer]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Commercial and Business Dispute Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[FINRA Arbitration]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Fraud and Misrepresentation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Private Securities Transactions]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Promissory Notes]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Real Estate Investment Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[REIT's]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions 2013]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Private Equity, Private Placement and Private Investment – South Florida Fraud, Misrepresentation and Mismanagement State and Federal Litigation and FINRA Arbitration Attorney: The Securities and Exchange Commission recently charged the former president of a purported private equity real estate firm based in San Bernardino, Calif., with defrauding nearly 500 investors who purchased promissory notes under&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p><strong>Private Equity, Private Placement and Private Investment – South Florida Fraud, Misrepresentation and Mismanagement State and Federal Litigation and FINRA Arbitration Attorney:</strong></p>


<p>The Securities and Exchange Commission recently charged the former president of a purported private equity real estate firm based in San Bernardino, Calif., with defrauding nearly 500 investors who purchased promissory notes under the false premise that they were secured by specific properties or other collateral.</p>


<p>The SEC alleges that Larry Polhill used his company American Pacific Financial Corporation (APFC) to buy and sell real estate and distressed assets, and he offered investors the opportunity to invest in the company through unregistered notes that would yield them interest payments of 5 to 17 percent per year. However, the collateral that Polhill and APFC claimed made the investments secure was often non-existent or otherwise impaired. The properties underlying the investments were sometimes even sold without notice to investors. When APFC eventually filed for bankruptcy, it named the investors as unsecured creditors who were owed nearly $160 million. None of Polhill’s investment offerings were registered with the SEC.</p>


<p>Polhill agreed to settle the SEC’s charges and be barred from acting as the officer or director of any public company. The settlement is subject to the approval of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, which would decide monetary sanctions at a later date.</p>


<p>According to the SEC’s complaint, in addition to promissory notes, investors also could invest in APFC-sponsored funds that pooled investor money to make loans to APFC. The company made regularly scheduled interest payments to investors in the notes and the funds from the mid-1980s to 2007. As a result, its investor base continually grew and the company began making larger and larger investments in distressed assets by buying numerous companies out of bankruptcy. While a few of APFC’s investments were successful, the vast majority failed unbeknownst to investors. Consequently, the assets held by APFC that were securing the notes and loans held by investors decreased in value. In early 2008, APFC ceased making its scheduled payments to most investors, but continued to issue newsletters, pay preferred investors, and engage in other activities designed to create a false sense of security about the investments in the company.</p>


<p>The SEC alleges that Polhill made several material misrepresentations to investors. Specifically, he told investors that the notes were secured by collateral when no such security interest existed. He failed to disclose that the collateral securing some investors’ notes already had been pledged to other lenders. Polhill represented that he would notify investors if their collateral went into default when that was often not the case. For instance, one investor’s note specifically stated it was secured by property located in Hesperia, Calif., that was owned by APFC and pledged as collateral. However, APFC sold the collateral in 2004, and neither Polhill nor APFC informed the investor that his collateral had been sold and there was no longer any asset securing the note.</p>


<p>The SEC’s complaint charges Polhill with violating Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act. Polhill has consented to the entry of an order that permanently enjoins him from violating these laws and permanently bars him from acting as an officer or director of any public company.</p>


<p><strong>Contact Us:</strong></p>


<p>With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation.</p>


<p>At the Fort Lauderdale Law Office of Russell L. Forkey, we represent clients throughout South and Central Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Sunrise, Plantation, Coral Springs, Deerfield Beach, Pompano Beach, Delray, Boynton Beach, Hollywood, Lake Worth, Royal Palm Beach, Manalapan, Jupiter, Gulf Stream, Wellington, Fort Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jupiter, Miami, Orlando, Maitland, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Heathrow, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa Beach, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormand Beach, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Dade County, Orange County, Seminole County, Martin County, Brevard County, Indian River County, Volusia County and Monroe County, Florida. The law office of Russell L. Forkey also represents South American, Canadian and other foreign residents that do business with U.S. financial institutions, investment advisors, brokerage and precious metal firms.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Limited Partnership – Florida Breach of Contract and Breach of Fiduciary Duty State and Federal Court Commercial and Business Litigation Attorney]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/limited_partnership_-_florida_breach_of_contract_and_breach_of_fiduciary_duty_state_and_federal_cour/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/limited_partnership_-_florida_breach_of_contract_and_breach_of_fiduciary_duty_state_and_federal_cour/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 23:19:09 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Breach of Contract]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Breach of Fiduciary Duty]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Commercial and Business Dispute Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Investment Terms and Concepts]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Limited Partnership Fraud and Mismanagement]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Real Estate Investment Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Limited Partnership Breach of Contract, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Mismanagement and Misrepresentation Commercial and Business State and Federal Court Litigation Attorney: A Limited Partnership is an organization made up of a General Partner, who manages the entity, and limited partners, who invest money but have limited liability, are who are not involved in the day-to-day&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p><strong>Limited Partnership Breach of Contract, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Mismanagement and Misrepresentation Commercial and Business State and Federal Court Litigation Attorney:</strong></p>


<p>A Limited Partnership is an organization made up of a General Partner, who manages the entity, and limited partners, who invest money but have limited liability, are who are not involved in the day-to-day management and operation of the venture.  With certain exceptions, limited partners usually cannot lose more than their invested capital.  Limited partnerships are engaged in business ventures such as real estate, oil and gas and equipment leasing.</p>


<p>Public limited partnerships are sold through brokerage firms by the use of written offering documents.  Private limited partnerships can be offered through various means. Regardless, each offering method must comply with federal and state securities laws.  </p>


<p>There are a number of claims that can be made by investors who feel that they were fraudulently induced into investing.  These claims are based upon violations of the anti-fraud provision of federal or state securities laws or common law claims such as fraud-in-the-inducement.</p>


<p>Claims that might arise after the investment has been made may be based upon breach of the terms of the limited partnership agreement, mismanagement or violation of state laws relating to the operation and management of the limited partnership.</p>


<p>Please keep in mind that this post is being provided for educational purposes only.  It is not designed to be complete in all material respects.  Thus, it should not be relied upon for legal or investment advice.  If you have any questions concerning the contents of this post, the reader should consult with a qualified professional.</p>


<p><strong>Contact Us:</strong></p>


<p>With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation.</p>


<p>At the Fort Lauderdale Law Office of Russell L. Forkey, we represent clients throughout South and Central Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Sunrise, Plantation, Coral Springs, Deerfield Beach, Pompano Beach, Delray, Boynton Beach, Hollywood, Lake Worth, Royal Palm Beach, Manalapan, Jupiter, Gulf Stream, Wellington, Fort Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jupiter, Miami, Orlando, Maitland, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Heathrow, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa Beach, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormand Beach, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Dade County, Orange County, Seminole County, Martin County, Brevard County, Indian River County, Volusia County and Monroe County, Florida. The law office of Russell L. Forkey also represents South American, Canadian and other foreign residents that do business with U.S. financial institutions, investment advisors, brokerage and precious metal firms.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Daniel F. Peterson and USA Real Estate Fund 1, Inc. – South Florida Investment Capital Fraud and Misrepresentation State and Federal Litigation Attorney]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/daniel_f_peterson_and_usa_real_estate_fund_1_inc_-_south_florida_investment_capital_fraud_and_misrep/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/daniel_f_peterson_and_usa_real_estate_fund_1_inc_-_south_florida_investment_capital_fraud_and_misrep/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 20:26:54 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Fraud and Misrepresentation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Real Estate Investment Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions 2013]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities and Securities Fraud]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Securities and Exchange Commission v. USA Real Estate Fund 1, Inc. and Daniel F. Peterson, Civil Action No. CV-13-157-LRS (E.D. Washington, filed Apr. 24, 2013) SEC Seeks to Halt Scheme Raising Investor Funds Under Guise of Jobs Act The Securities and Exchange Commission recently announced fraud charges against a Spokane Valley, Wash., company and its&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p><strong><em>Securities and Exchange Commission v. USA Real Estate Fund 1, Inc. and Daniel F. Peterson</em>, Civil Action No. CV-13-157-LRS (E.D. Washington, filed Apr. 24, 2013)</strong></p>


<p><strong>SEC Seeks to Halt Scheme Raising Investor Funds Under Guise of Jobs Act</strong></p>


<p>The Securities and Exchange Commission recently announced fraud charges against a Spokane Valley, Wash., company and its owner for misleading investors with claims to raise billions of investment capital under the Jumpstart Our Business Startups (JOBS) Act and invest it exclusively in American businesses.</p>


<p>The SEC alleges that Daniel F. Peterson and his company USA Real Estate Fund 1 promised investors that they could reap spectacular returns from an upcoming offering in a “secured” product backed by prominent financial firms. Peterson repeatedly told investors that the 2012 JOBS Act would enable him to raise billions of dollars by advertising the offering to the general public, and produce big profits for early investors. He preyed upon investors’ sense of patriotism by promising to invest the proceeds of the offering in exclusively American businesses, and help assist in Washington State’s economic recovery. The SEC alleges that Peterson used investors’ money for personal expenses, and is continuing to solicit investors and may be preparing to tout the offering through investor seminars and public advertising.</p>


<p>According to the SEC’s complaint filed in federal court in Spokane, Peterson sold common stock in USA Real Estate Fund from November 2010 to June 2012 to more than 20 investors in Washington and at least five other states. In e-mails and in periodic e-newsletters that he used to solicit USA Real Estate Fund investors, Peterson claimed that he was preparing to raise billions of dollars in a second offering of additional preferred” securities, which he claimed would be “secured” and have 10-year returns of up to 1,300 percent. Peterson claimed that two prominent Wall Street financial firms had partnered with him to bring his offering to market, and that the firms had conducted due diligence on USA Real Estate Fund and were structuring sales agreements and pricing. Peterson promised the early investors they would profit massively once the purported future offering was underway.</p>


<p>Peterson’s claims were false. He has no guaranteed investment product to offer, the projected returns were either fictitious or based on implausible and unsupported analyses, and he has no affiliation with any financial firm to underwrite his purported future offering, the SEC alleged.</p>


<p>The SEC alleges that Peterson used investor money to pay for his rent, food, entertainment, vacations, and a rented Mercedes Benz SUV. He also used investor funds on clothing for friends, luggage for his wife, and expenses at a Las Vegas casino.</p>


<p>The SEC’s complaint charges USA Fund and Peterson with violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act) and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The SEC seeks disgorgement and financial penalties as well as a preliminary injunction restraining USA Real Estate Fund and Peterson from engaging in conduct that would allow them to continue their scheme, and restraining them from further violations of the securities laws.</p>


<p><strong>Contact Us:</strong></p>


<p>With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation.</p>


<p>At the Fort Lauderdale Law Office of Russell L. Forkey, we represent clients throughout South and Central Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Sunrise, Plantation, Coral Springs, Deerfield Beach, Pompano Beach, Delray, Boynton Beach, Hollywood, Lake Worth, Royal Palm Beach, Manalapan, Jupiter, Gulf Stream, Wellington, Fort Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jupiter, Miami, Orlando, Maitland, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Heathrow, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa Beach, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormand Beach, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Dade County, Orange County, Seminole County, Martin County, Brevard County, Indian River County, Volusia County and Monroe County, Florida. The law office of Russell L. Forkey also represents South American, Canadian and other foreign residents that do business with U.S. financial institutions, investment advisors, brokerage and precious metal firms.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Florida Real Estate and Real Estate Fund Fraud and Mismanagement Litigation Attorney]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/florida_real_estate_and_real_estate_fund_fraud_and_mismanagement_litigation_attorney/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/florida_real_estate_and_real_estate_fund_fraud_and_mismanagement_litigation_attorney/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 18:15:39 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Fraud and Misrepresentation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Real Estate Investment Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions 2013]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Securities and Exchange Commission v. Walter Ng, Kelly Ng, Bruce Horwitz, and The Mortgage Fund, LLC, Civil Action No. C-13 0895-NC (U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California) The Securities and Exchange Commission recently charged three Bay Area real estate fund managers with fraud for secretly using the assets of a new real&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p><strong><em>Securities and Exchange Commission v. Walter Ng, Kelly Ng, Bruce Horwitz, and The Mortgage Fund, LLC</em>, Civil Action No. C-13 0895-NC (U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California)</strong></p>


<p>The Securities and Exchange Commission recently charged three Bay Area real estate fund managers with fraud for secretly using the assets of a new real estate fund to rescue an older, rapidly collapsing fund.</p>


<p>The SEC alleges that Walter Ng, his son Kelly Ng, and Bruce Horwitz lured investors into their real estate fund called Mortgage Fund ’08 LLC (MF08) by claiming it was safe and secure and would replicate the success of their earlier real estate fund, R.E. Loans LLC. In reality, R.E. Loans could no longer make payouts to its investors, so the Ngs funneled millions of dollars from MF08 to prop up R.E. Loans. The Ngs and Horwitz falsely touted both funds’ performance in their effort to continue raising money. They raised more than $85 million during an 18-month period from investors primarily living in the San Francisco area.</p>


<p>According to the SEC’s complaint filed in federal court in Oakland, the Ngs and Horwitz promoted the MF08 fund in the midst of the 2008 financial crisis as a new opportunity to invest in conservatively underwritten commercial real estate loans secured by deeds of trust. But the Ngs and their advisory firm, The Mortgage Fund LLC, immediately began transferring money raised by MF08 to R.E. Loans so that they could afford distributions to investors in that fund. From December 2007 to March 2008, the Ngs transferred almost $39 million from MF08 to R.E. Loans. They later attempted to justify the transfers by claiming MF08 had purchased three loans from R.E. Loans that totaled around $39 million.</p>


<p>The SEC further alleges that both the Ngs and Horwitz lured investors into MF08 by making false claims about its performance and the R.E. Loans fund’s performance. What investors did not know was that both R.E. Loans and MF08 began to experience significant and dramatic borrower defaults in 2008. For example, the percentage of the R.E. Loans portfolio that was either delinquent or in default increased from 19 percent in January 2008 to 48 percent in August 2008. The percentage of the MF08 portfolio that was delinquent increased from 16 percent in March 2008 to 74 percent in mid-June 2008.</p>


<p>The SEC alleges that despite the funds’ rapidly disintegrating portfolios, the Ngs and Horwitz repeatedly assured investors that R.E. Loans and MF08 were performing well and the underlying loans were safe and secure. For example, both Walter Ng and Horwitz touted the funds’ purportedly positive performance at a June 2008 investor dinner in Oakland’s Chinatown. Additionally, Walter Ng and Kelly Ng in July 2008 characterized MF08 as a “fantastic success” even though more than 70 percent of its loan portfolio was delinquent by that time.</p>


<p>The SEC’s complaint charges Walter Ng and Kelly Ng with violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act), Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and Sections 206(1) and (2) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (“Advisers Act”); Bruce Horwitz with violating Section 17(a)(2) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5(b) thereunder; and The Mortgage Fund with violating Sections 206(1) and (2) of the Advisers Act. The Complaint seeks injunctive relief, disgorgement of wrongful profits, and financial penalties against all four defendants.</p>


<p><strong>Contact Us:</strong></p>


<p>With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation.</p>


<p>At the Fort Lauderdale Law Office of Russell L. Forkey, we represent clients throughout South and Central Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Sunrise, Plantation, Coral Springs, Deerfield Beach, Pompano Beach, Delray, Boynton Beach, Hollywood, Lake Worth, Royal Palm Beach, Manalapan, Jupiter, Gulf Stream, Wellington, Fort Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jupiter, Miami, Orlando, Maitland, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Heathrow, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa Beach, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormand Beach, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Dade County, Orange County, Seminole County, Martin County, Brevard County, Indian River County, Volusia County and Monroe County, Florida. The law office of Russell L. Forkey also represents South American, Canadian and other foreign residents that do business with U.S. financial institutions, investment advisors, brokerage and precious metal firms.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Fred Davis Clark, Jr., David W. Schwarz, Cristal R. Coleman, Barry J. Graham and Ricky Lynn Stokes – Florida Real Estate Investment Litigation Attorney]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/fred_davis_clark_jr_david_w_schwarz_cristal_r_coleman_barry_j_graham_and_ricky_lynn_stokes_-_florida/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/fred_davis_clark_jr_david_w_schwarz_cristal_r_coleman_barry_j_graham_and_ricky_lynn_stokes_-_florida/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 02:09:43 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Fraud and Misrepresentation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Other Types of Fraudulent Activity]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Private Placements / Direct Investments]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Real Estate Investment Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions 2013]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>SEC Charges Real Estate Executives in Florida-Based $300 Million Investment Scheme The Securities and Exchange Commission recently charged five former real estate executives who defrauded investors into believing they were funding the development of five-star destination resorts in Florida and Las Vegas when they were actually buying into a Ponzi scheme. The SEC alleges that&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p><strong>SEC Charges Real Estate Executives in Florida-Based $300 Million Investment Scheme</strong></p>


<p>The Securities and Exchange Commission recently charged five former real estate executives who defrauded investors into believing they were funding the development of five-star destination resorts in Florida and Las Vegas when they were actually buying into a Ponzi scheme.</p>


<p>The SEC alleges that Cay Clubs Resorts and Marinas raised more than $300 million from nearly 1,400 investors nationwide through a network of hundreds of sales agents, marketing seminars, and podcasts that touted the profitability of purchasing units at Cay Clubs resort locations. Investors were promised immediate income from a guaranteed 15 percent return and a future income stream through a rental program that Cay Clubs managed. But instead of using investor funds to develop resort properties and units, the Cay Clubs executives used new investor deposits to pay leaseback returns to earlier investors. Meanwhile they paid themselves exorbitant salaries and commissions totaling more than $30 million, and investor funds also were misused to buy airplanes and boats. While still advertising itself as a profitable venture, Cay Clubs eventually abandoned its operations. Many investors’ properties went into foreclosure.</p>


<p>The SEC’s complaint filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida charges the following former Cay Clubs executives:</p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Fred Davis Clark, Jr. – president and CEO </li>
<li>David W. Schwarz – chief accounting officer </li>
<li>Cristal R. Coleman – manager and sales agent </li>
<li>Barry J. Graham – sales director </li>
<li>Ricky Lynn Stokes – sales director </li>
</ul>


<p>According to the SEC’s complaint, the scheme began in 2004. Clark, Coleman, Graham, and Stokes solicited investors with promises of guaranteed income, instant equity in undervalued properties, historic appreciation, and at least $30,000 in upgrades to the units they purchased at Cay Clubs resort locations in Florida and Las Vegas. The representations about investors’ profitability and instant equity were false because the purported triple-digit returns resulted from undisclosed insider transactions with Cay Clubs by Coleman, Graham, and Stokes. Their actions made it appear that Cay Clubs units had enormous rates of appreciation over a short period of time when in fact the transactions were merely part of an insider flipping scheme. Further, Stokes wrote letters directly to potential investors claiming that the leaseback payments and profits were “guaranteed” and that Cay Clubs was a “very stable financially healthy company worth BILLIONS.”</p>


<p>The SEC alleges that Cay Clubs continued to solicit new investors despite the fact that the company’s financial condition had deteriorated so significantly that it did not have sufficient funds to make the “guaranteed” leaseback or rental payments to investors. Clark, Coleman, and Schwarz misappropriated millions of dollars in investor funds using the multitude of bank accounts they controlled. Besides purchasing airplanes and boats, they misused investor money for unrelated business ventures including investments in precious metals and a liquor distillery that produced Pirate’s Choice Rum. After Cay Clubs abandoned its operations in 2008, Clark and Coleman (who are now husband and wife) moved to the Cayman Islands and continued to dissipate assets and funnel at least $2 million to offshore accounts.</p>


<p>The SEC’s complaint seeks financial penalties from Clark, Coleman, and Stokes and the disgorgement of ill-gotten gains plus prejudgment interest by all five executives. The complaint also seeks injunctive relief to enjoin them from future violations of the federal securities laws as well as an accounting and an order to repatriate investor assets.</p>


<p><strong>Contact Us:</strong></p>


<p>With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation.</p>


<p>At the Fort Lauderdale Law Office of Russell L. Forkey, we represent clients throughout South and Central Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Sunrise, Plantation, Coral Springs, Deerfield Beach, Pompano Beach, Delray, Boynton Beach, Hollywood, Lake Worth, Royal Palm Beach, Manalapan, Jupiter, Gulf Stream, Wellington, Fort Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jupiter, Miami, Orlando, Maitland, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Heathrow, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa Beach, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormand Beach, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Dade County, Orange County, Seminole County, Martin County, Brevard County, Indian River County, Volusia County and Monroe County, Florida. The law office of Russell L. Forkey also represents South American, Canadian and other foreign residents that do business with U.S. financial institutions, investment advisors, brokerage and precious metal firms.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Thomas S. Mulholland and James C. Mulholland, Jr. – Florida Real Estate Investment Fraud and Misrepresentation FINRA, AAA and JAMS Arbitration and Litigation Attorney]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/thomas_s_mulholland_and_james_c_mulholland_jr_-_florida_real_estate_investment_fraud_and_misrepresen/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/thomas_s_mulholland_and_james_c_mulholland_jr_-_florida_real_estate_investment_fraud_and_misrepresen/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 13:59:55 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Real Estate Investment Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions 2012]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Securities and Exchange Commission v. James C. Mulholland, Jr. and Thomas S. Mulholland, Civil Action No. 12-cv-14663 (E.D. Mich., filed October 22, 2012) SEC Charges Two in Michigan-based Fraudulent Securities Offering The Securities and Exchange Commission recently announced that it filed a civil injunctive action against brothers James Mulholland and Thomas Mulholland accusing them of&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p><strong><em>Securities and Exchange Commission v. James C. Mulholland, Jr. and Thomas S. Mulholland</em>, Civil Action No. 12-cv-14663 (E.D. Mich., filed October 22, 2012)</strong></p>


<p><strong>SEC Charges Two in Michigan-based Fraudulent Securities Offering</strong></p>


<p>The Securities and Exchange Commission recently announced that it filed a civil injunctive action against brothers James Mulholland and Thomas Mulholland accusing them of conducting a fraudulent, unregistered offer and sale of approximately $2 million in securities.</p>


<p>The SEC’s complaint, filed in U.S. District Court in Detroit, alleges that the Mulhollands operated a real estate business which involved buying, maintaining, and renting residential real estate in Michigan. The SEC’s complaint alleges that to finance the real estate business, the Mulhollands raised money from individual investors residing in Michigan and Florida through the offer and sale of securities in the form of demand notes. Beginning in at least January 2009, however, the Mulhollands’ real estate business began to experience financial difficulties. The Mulhollands continued to raise money from investors and from January 2009 through January 2010, they raised approximately $2 million from approximately 75 investors. The Mulhollands told these investors that their real estate business was profitable, they would earn 7% per year on their investment, the returns would be generated by profits of the real estate business, and that the investors could get their money back upon 30 days’ written notice.</p>


<p>The SEC’s complaint alleges that the Mulhollands statements to investors were false and/or misleading. The real estate business was losing money during this period, needed new investor funds to pay its bills and to pay interest to previous investors, and did not have the means to refund investors’ principal within 30 days even if a small number of them asked for their money back. The Mulhollands concealed their perilous financial condition from investors. The Mulhollands never told investors that they were experiencing financial hardship, that they were having difficulty meeting financial obligations critical to the real estate operation, or that they were contemplating filing for bankruptcy.</p>


<p>The SEC’s complaint charges the Mulhollands with violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 10(b) and 15(a)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The SEC is seeking against the Mulhollands a permanent injunction, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains with prejudgment interest to be paid jointly and severally, and civil monetary penalties.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Derek F.C. Elliott – Florida Sale of Unregistered Securities FINRA, AAA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/derek_fc_elliott_-_florida_sale_of_unregistered_securities_finra_aaa_arbitration_and_litigation_atto/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/derek_fc_elliott_-_florida_sale_of_unregistered_securities_finra_aaa_arbitration_and_litigation_atto/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 09:32:37 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Fraud and Misrepresentation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[General Investment News]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Other Types of Fraudulent Activity]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Real Estate Investment Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions 2012]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Final Judgments Entered Against Derek F.C. Elliott On October 5, 2012 the Honorable James C. Mahan, United States District Judge for the District of Nevada, entered a Final Judgment against Derek F.C. Elliott (Elliott). On May 24, 2012, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission filed a complaint, in the United States District Court for&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Final Judgments Entered Against Derek F.C. Elliott</h3>


<p>On October 5, 2012 the Honorable James C. Mahan, United States District Judge for the District of Nevada, entered a Final Judgment against Derek F.C. Elliott (Elliott).</p>


<p>On May 24, 2012, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission filed a complaint, in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, against James B. Catledge, Derek F.C. Elliott, EMI Resorts (S.V.G.) Inc., EMI Sun Village, Inc. and Sun Village Juan Dolio alleging that James B. Catledge and Elliott, and certain of their related entities, made material misrepresentations to investors in connection with the unregistered sale of interests in two resorts in the Dominican Republic. The Final Judgment against Elliot seeks no civil penalty at this time, waives disgorgement and authorizes the Commission to seek a civil penalty of not more than $250,000 by subsequent motion.</p>


<p>The Final Judgment enjoins Elliott from future violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a)(1), (2) and (3) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 15(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. [SEC v. James B. Catledge, Derek F.C. Elliott, EMI Resorts (S.V.G.) Inc., EMI Sun Village, Inc. and Sun Village Juan Dolio, Inc., Case No. 2:12-cv-00887-JCM-RJJ (USDC Nevada].</p>


<p><strong>Contact Us:</strong></p>


<p>With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation.</p>


<p>At the Fort Lauderdale Law Office of Russell L. Forkey, we represent clients throughout South and Central Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Sunrise, Plantation, Coral Springs, Deerfield Beach, Pompano Beach, Delray, Boynton Beach, Hollywood, Lake Worth, Royal Palm Beach, Manalapan, Jupiter, Gulf Stream, Wellington, Fort Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jupiter, Miami, Orlando, Maitland, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Heathrow, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa Beach, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormand Beach, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Dade County, Orange County, Seminole County, Martin County, Brevard County, Indian River County, Volusia County and Monroe County, Florida. The law office of Russell L. Forkey also represents South American, Canadian and other foreign residents that do business with U.S. financial institutions, investment advisors, brokerage and precious metal firms.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Andre J. Hayden – Florida Real Estate and Investment Fraud and Misrepresentation Litigation and FINRA and AAA Arbitration Attorney]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/andre_j_hayden_-_florida_real_estate_and_investment_fraud_and_misrepresentation_litigation_and_finra/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/andre_j_hayden_-_florida_real_estate_and_investment_fraud_and_misrepresentation_litigation_and_finra/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 09:17:43 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Fraud and Misrepresentation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Real Estate Investment Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions 2012]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>In the Matter of Andre J. Hayden On October 15, 2012, the Securities and Exchange Commission (Commission) issued an Order Instituting Administrative Proceedings Pursuant to Section 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making Findings and Imposing Remedial Sanctions (Order) against Andre J. Hayden. The Order finds that Hayden acted as an unregistered broker,&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<h3 class="wp-block-heading">In the Matter of Andre J. Hayden</h3>


<p>On October 15, 2012, the Securities and Exchange Commission (Commission) issued an Order Instituting Administrative Proceedings Pursuant to Section 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Making Findings and Imposing Remedial Sanctions (Order) against Andre J. Hayden. The Order finds that Hayden acted as an unregistered broker, and solicited prospective investors to purchase interests in a purported real estate joint venture operated by Titan Investment Partners Corp. and, on July 23, 2012, a judgment was entered against Hayden, permanently enjoining him from, among other things, future violations of Section 15(a) of the Exchange Act, in a civil action entitled SEC v. Amella, et al., Civil Action Number 1:11-CV-6849, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The Order further finds that the Complaint alleged that, without investigating the legitimacy of the purported real estate joint venture and the accuracy of his representations, Hayden falsely informed investors that their funds would be used to purchase and develop real estate and that they would receive a guaranteed 10% monthly return on their investments.</p>


<p>Based on the above, the Order bars Hayden from association with any broker, dealer, investment adviser, municipal securities dealer, municipal advisor, transfer agent, or nationally recognized statistical rating organization, and also bars him from participating in any offering of a penny stock. Hayden consented to the issuance of the Order without admitting or denying the findings in the Order, except he admitted the entry of the injunction.</p>


<p><strong>Contact Us:</strong></p>


<p>With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation.</p>


<p>At the Fort Lauderdale Law Office of Russell L. Forkey, we represent clients throughout South and Central Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Sunrise, Plantation, Coral Springs, Deerfield Beach, Pompano Beach, Delray, Boynton Beach, Hollywood, Lake Worth, Royal Palm Beach, Manalapan, Jupiter, Gulf Stream, Wellington, Fort Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jupiter, Miami, Orlando, Maitland, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Heathrow, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa Beach, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormand Beach, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Dade County, Orange County, Seminole County, Martin County, Brevard County, Indian River County, Volusia County and Monroe County, Florida. The law office of Russell L. Forkey also represents South American, Canadian and other foreign residents that do business with U.S. financial institutions, investment advisors, brokerage and precious metal firms.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Bradley A. Holcom and Jose L. Pinedo – South Florida Senior Investment and Securities Fraud FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/bradley_a_holcom_and_jose_l_pinedo_-_south_florida_senior_investment_and_securities_fraud_finra_arbi/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/bradley_a_holcom_and_jose_l_pinedo_-_south_florida_senior_investment_and_securities_fraud_finra_arbi/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:51:23 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Fraud and Misrepresentation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[News of Interest to Seniors]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Ponzi Scheme News]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Real Estate Investment Fraud]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>SEC v. Bradley A. Holcom, Civ. No. 3:12-cv-01623 (S.D. Cal.); SEC v. Jose L. Pinedo, Civ. No. 3:12-cv-01620 (S.D. Cal.). September, 2012: SEC Brings Charges in $42 Million Offering Fraud Targeting Seniors The Securities and Exchange Commission recently announced charges against Bradley A. Holcom, of Welches, Oregon, and Jose L. Pinedo, of San Diego, California,&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p><strong><em>SEC v. Bradley A. Holcom</em>, Civ. No. 3:12-cv-01623 (S.D. Cal.);</strong></p>


<p><strong><em>SEC v. Jose L. Pinedo</em>, Civ. No. 3:12-cv-01620 (S.D. Cal.).</strong></p>


<p><strong>September, 2012:</strong></p>


<p><strong>SEC Brings Charges in $42 Million Offering Fraud Targeting Seniors</strong></p>


<p>The Securities and Exchange Commission recently announced charges against Bradley A. Holcom, of Welches, Oregon, and Jose L. Pinedo, of San Diego, California, in connection with a fraudulent scheme that sold $42 million of promissory notes to more than 150 investors located across the United States, many of whom are senior citizens.</p>


<p>According to the complaint against Holcom, he lured investors by offering them guaranteed monthly interest payments on purportedly safe deals. He promised that their funds would be used to finance the development of specific pieces of real estate, and that each investment would be fully secured. In reality, the investments were unsecured, and the same piece of underlying property was often pledged as purported collateral on numerous investors’ promissory notes.</p>


<p>In addition to his misrepresentations, the complaint alleges that Holcom was also running a classic Ponzi scheme. While Holcom used some of the investors’ money to develop real estate, he also relied on those funds to make interest and principal payments on promissory notes as they came due. Holcom also used investor funds for personal use and on unrelated business ventures. By 2008, as the real estate market declined, Holcom’s scheme collapsed. Investors lost principal in excess of $25 million.</p>


<p>The Commission also alleges that Pinedo, who served as Holcom’s bookkeeper and as an officer or manager of Holcom’s numerous corporate entities, routinely signed promissory notes and other false and misleading documents that were sent to investors.</p>


<p>The Commission alleges that Holcom violated Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”), Sections 10(b) and 15(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The Commission is seeking a permanent injunction, disgorgement plus pre- and post-judgment interest, and civil penalties against Holcom. Without admitting or denying the allegations in the Commission’s complaint against him, Pinedo has agreed to settle the matter, and consented to a final judgment enjoining him from violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c), 17(a)(2) and 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act.</p>


<p><strong>Contact Us:</strong></p>


<p>With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation.</p>


<p>At the Fort Lauderdale Law Office of Russell L. Forkey, we represent clients throughout South and Central Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Sunrise, Plantation, Coral Springs, Deerfield Beach, Pompano Beach, Delray, Boynton Beach, Hollywood, Lake Worth, Royal Palm Beach, Manalapan, Jupiter, Gulf Stream, Wellington, Fort Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jupiter, Miami, Orlando, Maitland, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Heathrow, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa Beach, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormand Beach, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Dade County, Orange County, Seminole County, Martin County, Brevard County, Indian River County, Volusia County and Monroe County, Florida. The law office of Russell L. Forkey also represents South American, Canadian and other foreign residents that do business with U.S. financial institutions, investment advisors, brokerage and precious metal firms.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Western Financial Planning Corporation and Louis v. Schooler – South Florida Real Estate Investment Fraud Attorney]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/western_financial_planning_corporation_and_louis_v_schooler_-_south_florida_real_estate_investment_f/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/western_financial_planning_corporation_and_louis_v_schooler_-_south_florida_real_estate_investment_f/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 18:40:20 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Fraud and Misrepresentation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Real Estate Investment Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions 2012]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>SEC Shuts Down San Diego-Based Real Estate Investment Fraud September, 2012: The Securities and Exchange Commission recently announced an asset freeze against a San Diego-based firm and its owner accused of running a real estate investment fraud that raised approximately $50 million from hundreds of investors nationwide. The SEC alleges that Western Financial Planning Corporation&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p><a></a><strong>SEC Shuts Down San Diego-Based Real Estate Investment Fraud</strong></p>


<p><strong>September, 2012:</strong></p>


<p>The Securities and Exchange Commission recently announced an asset freeze against a San Diego-based firm and its owner accused of running a real estate investment fraud that raised approximately $50 million from hundreds of investors nationwide.</p>


<p>The SEC alleges that Western Financial Planning Corporation and Louis V. Schooler sold units in partnerships that Western had organized to buy vacant land in Nevada and hold for sale at a profit at a later date. Schooler and Western failed to tell investors that they were paying an exorbitant mark-up on the land, in some cases more than five times its fair market value. Schooler and Western also failed to tell investors that the land held by the partnerships was often encumbered by mortgages that Western used to help finance the initial purchase of the land.</p>


<p>“Schooler conned hundreds of people into investing with Western by leading them to believe that they were getting a good value for plots of vacant land,” said Michele Wein Layne, Director of the SEC’s Los Angeles Regional Office. “What he didn’t tell them was that the land was worth only a small fraction of their investment and that he was profiting at their expense.”</p>


<p>The SEC’s complaint filed in federal court in San Diego alleges that Western and Schooler misled investors since 2007 by providing them with comparative prices or “comps” of supposedly similar plots of land that had sold for prices higher than those offered by Western. In reality, the real estate comps that Schooler and Western provided were in no way comparable to the land sold by Western. The SEC also alleges that since the spring of 2011, Schooler paid “hush money” to silence investors who discovered they had been defrauded, allowing the scheme to continue.</p>


<p>The Honorable Larry A. Burns for the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California yesterday granted the SEC’s request for a temporary restraining order and asset freeze against Schooler, Western, and all entities under Western’s control, and appointed Thomas C. Hebrank as a temporary receiver over Western and the entities. Judge Burns has sche<a></a>duled a court hearing for Sept. 17, 2012, on the SEC’s motion for a preliminary injunction.</p>


<p><strong>Contact Us:</strong></p>


<p>With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation.</p>


<p>At the Fort Lauderdale Law Office of Russell L. Forkey, we represent clients throughout South and Central Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Sunrise, Plantation, Coral Springs, Deerfield Beach, Pompano Beach, Delray, Boynton Beach, Hollywood, Lake Worth, Royal Palm Beach, Manalapan, Jupiter, Gulf Stream, Wellington, Fort Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jupiter, Miami, Orlando, Maitland, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Heathrow, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa Beach, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormand Beach, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Dade County, Orange County, Seminole County, Martin County, Brevard County, Indian River County, Volusia County and Monroe County, Florida. The law office of Russell L. Forkey also represents South American, Canadian and other foreign residents that do business with U.S. financial institutions, investment advisors, brokerage and precious metal firms.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Real Estate Investment Fraud and Misrepresentation Litigation Attorney]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/real_estate_fraud_and_misrepresentation_litigation_attorney/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/real_estate_fraud_and_misrepresentation_litigation_attorney/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 16:30:13 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Fraud and Misrepresentation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Real Estate Investment Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>SEC v. The Companies (TC), LLC, et al., Civil No.: 2:12-cv-00765-DN (USDC Utah, Filed July 6, 2012). August, 2012: SEC CHARGES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT COMPANY AND ITS PRINCIPALS WITH OFFERING FRAUD Recently, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed a Complaint in federal district court against The Companies (TC), LLC (“The Companies”) and its principals, Kristoffer&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p><em><strong>SEC v. The Companies (TC), LLC, et al., Civil No.: 2:12-cv-00765-DN (USDC Utah, Filed July 6, 2012).</strong></em></p>


<p><strong>August, 2012:</strong></p>


<p><strong>SEC CHARGES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT COMPANY AND ITS PRINCIPALS WITH OFFERING FRAUD</strong></p>


<p>Recently, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed a Complaint in federal district court against The Companies (TC), LLC (“The Companies”) and its principals, Kristoffer A. Krohn (“Kris Krohn”), Stephen R. Earl (“Earl”), and former officer, Michael K. Krohn (“Mike Krohn”) (collectively “Defendants”).</p>


<p>The Companies, directly and through related companies and subsidiaries, purchases distressed real estate for investment. The Complaint alleges that to raise money to purchase real estate, The Companies or its subsidiary, Alpha Real Estate Holdings, L.P. (“Alpha LP”), initiated four unregistered offerings of securities from January 2009 to June 2011. Kris Krohn, Earl, and Mike Krohn participated in the offerings by providing content for and approval of the private placement memoranda (“PPMs”) used to solicit investors and by directly offering the securities to investors. The four offerings raised a total of approximately $11.9 million from approximately 169 investors. The PPMs contained material misrepresentations and omissions related to, among other things, the value of properties to be purchased or that were owned by the Companies or Alpha LP.</p>


<p>In addition to containing false representations, each of the four offerings relied on the exemption to registration under Regulation D, Rule 506. The offerings did not qualify for the Rule 506 exemption because Defendants solicited investors through general solicitation at meetings that were open to the public.</p>


<p>The Defendants consented to entry of judgments against them without admitting or denying the allegations in the SEC’s complaint. Each of the Defendants consented to a judgment permanently enjoining them from violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933. In addition, The Companies agreed to undertake to inform all investors in writing of the final judgment, provide audited financial statements, and offer return of consideration for investors who choose to return their securities to The Companies after receiving the written disclosures. Kris Krohn, Mike Krohn, and Earl have also agreed to pay civil monetary penalties of $75,000 each.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>