<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
     xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
     xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
     xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
     xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
     xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <channel>
        <title><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions 2014 - Russell L. Forkey]]></title>
        <atom:link href="https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/categories/sec-enforcement-actions-2014/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/categories/sec-enforcement-actions-2014/</link>
        <description><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey's Website]]></description>
        <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2024 17:36:57 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        
        <language>en-us</language>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Steve Chen and USFIA Inc. – Fort Lauderdale, Florida Securities and Investment Fraud Litigation and Arbitration Attorney]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/steve_chen_and_usfia_inc_-_fort_lauderdale_florida_securities_and_investment_fraud_litigation_and_ar/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/steve_chen_and_usfia_inc_-_fort_lauderdale_florida_securities_and_investment_fraud_litigation_and_ar/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2015 14:23:20 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Precious Metals]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions 2014]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities and Securities Fraud]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Steve Chen and USFIA Inc. – South Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, Pompano Beach, Deerfield Beach and Boynton Beach, Securities and Investment Fraud Litigation and Arbitration Attorney SEC Halts $32 Million Scheme That Promised Riches From Amber Mining The Securities and Exchange Commission recently announced it has filed fraud charges and obtained asset freezes against the&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p><strong>Steve Chen and USFIA Inc. – South Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, Pompano Beach, Deerfield Beach and Boynton Beach, Securities and Investment Fraud Litigation and Arbitration Attorney</strong></p>


<p><strong>SEC Halts $32 Million Scheme That Promised Riches From Amber Mining</strong></p>


<p>The Securities and Exchange Commission recently announced it has filed fraud charges and obtained asset freezes against the operator of a worldwide pyramid scheme that falsely promised investors would profit from a venture purportedly backed by the company’s massive amber holdings.</p>


<p>California resident Steve Chen and 13 California-based entities, including USFIA Inc., are at the center of the alleged scheme, the SEC said in a complaint filed in federal court in Los Angeles.  According to the SEC’s complaint, USFIA and Chen’s other entities have raised more than $32 million from investors in and outside the U.S. since at least April 2013.  The SEC’s complaint alleges that Chen and his companies misled investors about a lucrative initial public offering for USFIA that never happened and about claims to own or control amber deposits worth billions of dollars.</p>


<p>The Hon. R. Gary Klausner of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California granted the SEC’s request for an asset freeze and the appointment of Thomas Seaman as the temporary receiver over USFIA and the other entities.  In addition to the temporary relief, the SEC is seeking preliminary and permanent injunctions, disgorgement of allegedly ill-gotten gains with prejudgment interest, and civil penalties. The complaint, which had been filed under seal, alleges that the defendants violated the registration and antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws and SEC antifraud rules.</p>


<p>According to the SEC’s complaint, Chen falsely promoted USFIA as a legitimate multi-level marketing company that owns several large and valuable amber mines in Argentina and the Dominican Republic.  Investors were told that they could profit by investing in amounts ranging from $1,000 to $30,000, and earn larger returns based on the number of investors they brought into the program.  The SEC further alleges that beginning in September 2014, the defendants claimed to have converted existing investors’ holdings into “Gemcoins,” which they said was a virtual currency secured by the company’s amber holdings. In reality, the SEC complaint alleges that Gemcoins are worthless.</p>


<p><strong>Contact Us:</strong></p>


<p>With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of elder abuse, exploitation and securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation.</p>


<p>At the Boca Raton Law Office of Russell L. Forkey, we represent clients throughout South and Central Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Sunrise, Plantation, Coral Springs, Deerfield Beach, Pompano Beach, Delray, Boynton Beach, Hollywood, Lake Worth, Royal Palm Beach, Manalapan, Jupiter, Gulf Stream, Wellington, Fort Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jupiter, Miami, Orlando, Maitland, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Heathrow, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa Beach, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormand Beach, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Dade County, Orange County, Seminole County, Martin County, Brevard County, Indian River County, Volusia County and Monroe County, Florida. The law office of Russell L. Forkey also represents South American, Canadian and other foreign residents that do business with U.S. financial institutions, investment advisors, brokerage and precious metal firms.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Efstratios D. Argyropoulos and Prima Capital Group, Inc. – Boca Raton, Florida Stock Promoter Fraud and Misrepresentation Attorney]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/efstratios_d_argyropoulos_and_prima_capital_group_inc_-_boca_raton_florida_stock_promoter_fraud_and/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/efstratios_d_argyropoulos_and_prima_capital_group_inc_-_boca_raton_florida_stock_promoter_fraud_and/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2014 02:59:21 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions 2014]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities and Securities Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Efstratios D. Argyropoulos and Prima Capital Group, Inc. – Boca Raton, Florida Stock Promoter Fraud and Misrepresentation Attorney Securities and Exchange Commission v. Efstratios “Elias” D. Argyropoulos and Prima Capital Group, Inc., Civil Action No. 2:14-cv-09800 (C.D. Cal.) SEC Charges Stock Promoter with Fraudulent Scheme Related to Pre-IPO Facebook and Twitter Shares On December 23,&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<h2 class="wp-block-heading"><em>Efstratios D. Argyropoulos and Prima Capital Group, Inc. – Boca Raton, Florida Stock Promoter Fraud and Misrepresentation Attorney</em></h2>


<p><strong><em>Securities and Exchange Commission v. Efstratios “Elias” D. Argyropoulos and Prima Capital Group, Inc.</em>, Civil Action No. 2:14-cv-09800 (C.D. Cal.)</strong></p>


<h3 class="wp-block-heading">SEC Charges Stock Promoter with Fraudulent Scheme Related to Pre-IPO Facebook and Twitter Shares</h3>


<p>On December 23, 2014, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged a stock promoter based in Santa Barbara, Calif., with fraudulently raising nearly $3.5 million from investors purportedly to purchase Facebook and Twitter shares prior to their <a href="../../../../Securities-Commodities-and-Precious-Metals-Terms/IPO-Initial-Public-Offering.shtml" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">initial public offerings </a>(IPOs).</p>


<p>The SEC alleges that instead of purchasing the shares in the secondary market as promised, Efstratios “Elias” Argyropoulos and his firm Prima Capital Group misappropriated investor funds. They used the money primarily for day trading of stocks and options as well as to pay off certain investors who complained when they didn’t receive the promised Facebook or Twitter shares.</p>


<p>Argyropoulos and Prima Capital agreed to settle the SEC’s charges and to be barred from working for an investment adviser or broker-dealer, and financial penalties will be determined at a later date.</p>


<p>The SEC’s complaint alleges that Argyropoulos and Prima violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”) and Sections 10(b) and 15(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and seeks permanent injunctions, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains with prejudgment interest, and, against Argyropoulos only, civil money penalties.</p>


<p>Without admitting or denying the allegations in the SEC’s complaint, Argyropoulos and Prima consented to a judgment permanently enjoining them from violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act and Sections 10(b) and 15(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, ordering them to pay, jointly and severally, disgorgement with prejudgment interest, and ordering Argyropoulos to pay civil money penalties. There will be further proceedings before the District Court to determine the amounts of disgorgement with prejudgment interest and civil money penalties. The bifurcated settlement remains subject to court approval. Argyropoulos also consented, without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings, to an administrative proceeding order barring him from, among other things, association with any broker, dealer or investment adviser. The administrative proceeding will be instituted following court approval of the bifurcated settlement.</p>


<p>Also on December 23, 2014, SEC separately announced an administrative proceeding against Khaled A. Eldaher, a registered representative living in Austin, Texas. The SEC Enforcement Division alleges that while working for a registered broker-dealer, Eldaher reached a side agreement with Argyropoulos to solicit investors and receive 50 percent of the mark-up on Facebook shares he sold. Eldaher sold $362,887.50 worth of Facebook shares and was paid $15,478 by Prima Capital. He was later terminated by the broker-dealer for selling securities other than through the firm. The Enforcement Division alleges that Eldaher’s sales of unregistered securities violated Section 15(a)(1) of the Exchange Act. The matter will be scheduled for a public hearing before an administrative law judge for proceedings to adjudicate the Enforcement Division’s allegations and determine what, if any, remedial actions are appropriate.</p>


<p><strong><a href="../../../../Attorney-Profile/index.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><strong>Contact Us</strong></a>:</strong></p>


<p>With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of elder abuse, exploitation and securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation.</p>


<p>At the Boca Raton Law Office of Russell L. Forkey, we represent clients throughout South and Central Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Sunrise, Plantation, Coral Springs, Deerfield Beach, Pompano Beach, Delray, Boynton Beach, Hollywood, Lake Worth, Royal Palm Beach, Manalapan, Jupiter, Gulf Stream, Wellington, Fort Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jupiter, Miami, Orlando, Maitland, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Heathrow, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa Beach, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormand Beach, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Dade County, Orange County, Seminole County, Martin County, Brevard County, Indian River County, Volusia County and Monroe County, Florida. The law office of Russell L. Forkey also represents South American, Canadian and other foreign residents that do business with U.S. financial institutions, investment advisors, brokerage and precious metal firms.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Oil and Gas Offering Fraud – Fraudulent Stock Manipulation – False and Misleading Press Releases]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/oil_and_gas_offering_fraud_-_fraudulent_stock_manipulation_-_false_and_misleading_press_releases/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/oil_and_gas_offering_fraud_-_fraudulent_stock_manipulation_-_false_and_misleading_press_releases/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 23:47:20 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Sales of Unregistered Securities]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions 2014]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities and Securities Fraud]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Boca Raton, Florida – Oil and Gas Offering Fraud – Fraudulent Stock Manipulation – False and Misleading Press Releases SEC Charges New Orleans Oil-And-Gas Company with Fraudulent Stock Manipulation Securities and Exchange Commission v. Treaty Energy Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 4:14-cv-00812 (E.D. Tex., filed December 15, 2014) The Securities and Exchange Commission recently&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Boca Raton, Florida – Oil and Gas Offering Fraud – Fraudulent Stock Manipulation – False and Misleading Press Releases</h2>


<p><strong>SEC Charges New Orleans <a href="../../../../Securities-Commodities-and-Precious-Metals-Terms/Oil-and-Gas-Partnerships-Beware.shtml" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Oil-And-Gas</a> Company with Fraudulent Stock Manipulation</strong></p>


<p>Securities and Exchange Commission v. Treaty Energy Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 4:14-cv-00812 (E.D. Tex., filed December 15, 2014)</p>


<p>The Securities and Exchange Commission recently charged a New Orleans-based oil-and-gas company and five executives with running a stock trading scheme in which they claimed to have struck oil in Belize in order to manipulate the price of the company’s stock as they illegally sold restricted shares to the public.</p>


<p>The SEC also charged a Houston-based attorney with facilitating the scheme by issuing false legal opinion letters that allowed free trading of the restricted company stock.</p>


<p>According to the SEC’s complaint filed in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Treaty Energy Corporation issued deceptive press releases touting drilling successes in Belize and Texas to induce investor demand for its unregistered stock, which was then illegally distributed to the public. The SEC alleges that Treaty Energy’s founder Ronald Blackburn and four company officers – Andrew V. Reid, Bruce A. Gwyn, Lee C. Schlesinger, and Michael A. Mulshine – obtained at least $3.5 million in illicit profits from the scheme.</p>


<p>The SEC’s complaint further alleges that Treaty Energy’s outside counsel Samuel Whitley abused his gatekeeper role and enabled the scheme by authoring improper legal opinion letters that allowed the company and its officers to illegally distribute unregistered stock to the public. Whitley was aware that Blackburn was running the company and Treaty Energy was abusing registration rules under the federal securities laws. Yet these facts did not deter him from issuing the opinion letters that allowed the scheme to proceed.</p>


<p>According to the SEC’s complaint, the scheme had three basic components. The first part began in January 2012 when Blackburn directed Treaty Energy to issue a press release claiming that its purported oil strike in Belize contained an estimated five to six million barrels of recoverable oil. Treaty’s stock price shot up nearly 80 percent that day. However, the Belize government publicly refuted Treaty Energy’s purported oil strike the very next day, calling the company’s statement “false and misleading” and “irresponsible.” The SEC alleges that despite Belize’s denial, Blackburn and the company’s officers continued to mislead investors by claiming that Belize was merely downplaying an actual oil strike for strategic reasons.</p>


<p>The SEC alleges that the second part of the scheme entailed Treaty Energy’s failure to disclose in public filings from 2009 to 2013 that Blackburn – previously convicted of federal income tax evasion – actually controlled the company and was a de facto officer. The SEC alleges that Reid, Gwyn, Schlesinger, and Mulshine all knew Blackburn’s true role at the company, but intentionally kept this fact out of its disclosures to conceal from the public that a convicted felon was in charge.</p>


<p>According to the SEC’s complaint, the final part of the scheme got underway in November 2013 when Treaty Energy began offering investors working interests in a well in West Texas. Investors were enticed with claims that the working interests were low-risk and expected to yield a return of 111.42 percent over a 10-year period. The SEC alleges that Treaty Energy and its officers knew these claims were baseless because the well was producing only marginal amounts of oil. In fact, the well produced 235 total barrels from October 2013 to October 2014.</p>


<p>The SEC’s complaint charges Treaty Energy, Blackburn, Reid, Gwyn, Mulshine, and Schlesinger with securities fraud as well as violations of the registration and reporting violations of the federal securities laws. The SEC seeks disgorgement of ill-gotten gains with prejudgment interest plus financial penalties as well as penny stock bars, officer-and-director bars, and permanent injunctions against them. Reid and Gwyn are additionally charged with signing false certifications in Treaty Energy’s SEC filings, and Whitley is accused of securities registration violations.</p>


<p><strong><a href="../../../../Attorney-Profile/index.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><strong>Contact Us:</strong></a></strong></p>


<p>With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of elder abuse, exploitation and securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation.</p>


<p>At the Boca Raton Law Office of Russell L. Forkey, we represent clients throughout South and Central Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Sunrise, Plantation, Coral Springs, Deerfield Beach, Pompano Beach, Delray, Boynton Beach, Hollywood, Lake Worth, Royal Palm Beach, Manalapan, Jupiter, Gulf Stream, Wellington, Fort Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jupiter, Miami, Orlando, Maitland, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Heathrow, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa Beach, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormand Beach, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Dade County, Orange County, Seminole County, Martin County, Brevard County, Indian River County, Volusia County and Monroe County, Florida. The law office of Russell L. Forkey also represents South American, Canadian and other foreign residents that do business with U.S. financial institutions, investment advisors, brokerage and precious metal firms.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Boca Raton, Florida Investment and Securities Fraud Litigation and Arbitration Attorney]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/boca_raton_florida_investment_and_securities_fraud_litigation_and_arbitration_attorney/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/boca_raton_florida_investment_and_securities_fraud_litigation_and_arbitration_attorney/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 19:08:32 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Hedge Fund Fraud News]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions 2014]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Boca Raton, Florida Hedge Fund, Securities and Investment Fraud and Breach of Fiduciary Duty Litigation and Arbitration Attorney: SEC Announces Fraud Charges Against Buffalo-Based Firm and Co-Owners Accused of Misleading Investors in Hedge Fund Hedge Fund’s Portfolio Manager Agrees to Settle Charges The Securities and Exchange Commission recently announced fraud charges against a Buffalo, N.Y.&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Boca Raton, Florida <a href="../../../../Securities-Commodities-and-Precious-Metals-Terms/Hedge-Funds.shtml" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Hedge Fund</a>, Securities and Investment Fraud and Breach of Fiduciary Duty Litigation and Arbitration Attorney:</h2>


<p><strong>SEC Announces Fraud Charges Against Buffalo-Based Firm and Co-Owners Accused of Misleading Investors in Hedge Fund</strong></p>


<p>Hedge Fund’s Portfolio Manager Agrees to Settle Charges</p>


<p>The Securities and Exchange Commission recently announced fraud charges against a Buffalo, N.Y. based investment advisory firm and two co-owners accused of making false and misleading statements to clients when recommending investments in a risky hedge fund. The hedge fund’s portfolio manager agreed to settle similar charges.</p>


<p>The SEC’s Enforcement Division alleges that Timothy S. Dembski and Walter F. Grenda Jr. steered their clients at Reliance Financial Advisors to invest in a hedge fund managed by Scott M. Stephan, whose experience in the securities industry was greatly exaggerated in offering materials they disseminated. Dembski and Grenda allegedly knew that Stephan had virtually no hedge fund investing experience at all, and spent the majority of his career collecting on past-due car loans. Nevertheless, highly speculative investments in the Prestige Wealth Management Fund were recommended to clients who were retired or nearing retirement and living on fixed incomes. The trading strategy that was allegedly described to investors was fully automated by an algorithm purportedly sought by big banks. The trading algorithm, however, did not work as intended and Stephan began placing trades manually, which led to the hedge fund’s eventual collapse.</p>


<p>According to the order instituting a proceeding before an administrative law judge, Dembski’s clients invested approximately $4 million in Prestige Wealth Management Fund and Grenda’s clients invested approximately $8 million. The hedge fund, which began trading in April 2011, did not generate the positive returns advertised, so Grenda withdrew his clients in October 2012. The fund lost about 80 percent of its value when it collapsed a couple months later, leaving Dembski’s clients to lose the vast majority of their investments.</p>


<p>The SEC’s Enforcement Division further alleges that Grenda borrowed $175,000 from two clients in late 2009 and falsely told them that he would use it as a loan to grow his investment advisory business. Grenda instead spent the money on personal expenses and debts.</p>


<p>The SEC’s Enforcement Division alleges that Dembski, Grenda, and Reliance Financial Advisors violated the antifraud provisions of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, Securities Act of 1933, and Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that Dembski and Grenda aided and abetted and caused violations of those same provisions by Reliance Financial and the general partner to the Prestige Wealth Management Fund.</p>


<p>In a separate order, Stephan agreed to settle findings that he violated the antifraud provisions of the Advisers Act, Securities Act, and Exchange Act, and aided and abetted and caused violations of those same provisions by the general partner to the Prestige Wealth Management Fund. Without admitting or denying the allegations, Stephan agreed to be permanently barred from the securities industry. Disgorgement and penalties will be determined at a later date.</p>


<p><strong><a href="../../../../Attorney-Profile/index.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><strong>Contact Us:</strong></a></strong></p>


<p>With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of elder abuse, exploitation and securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation.</p>


<p>At the Boca Raton Law Office of Russell L. Forkey, we represent clients throughout South and Central Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Sunrise, Plantation, Coral Springs, Deerfield Beach, Pompano Beach, Delray, Boynton Beach, Hollywood, Lake Worth, Royal Palm Beach, Manalapan, Jupiter, Gulf Stream, Wellington, Fort Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jupiter, Miami, Orlando, Maitland, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Heathrow, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa Beach, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormand Beach, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Dade County, Orange County, Seminole County, Martin County, Brevard County, Indian River County, Volusia County and Monroe County, Florida. The law office of Russell L. Forkey also represents South American, Canadian and other foreign residents that do business with U.S. financial institutions, investment advisors, brokerage and precious metal firms.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Fraudulent News Letters Used In Pump-and-Dump Schemes – Boca Raton, Florida Investment and Penny Stock Litigation Attorney]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/fraudulent_news_letters_used_in_pump-and-dump_schemes_-_boca_raton_florida_investment_and_penny_stoc/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/fraudulent_news_letters_used_in_pump-and-dump_schemes_-_boca_raton_florida_investment_and_penny_stoc/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2014 21:38:44 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[False and Misleading Sales Material]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Penny Stock Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions 2014]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Fraudulent News Letters Used In Pump-and-Dump Schemes – Boca Raton, Florida Investment and Penny Stock Litigation Attorney SEC Charges Three Penny Stock Promoters Behind Pump-and-Dump Schemes The Securities and Exchange Commission recently charged three penny stock promoters with conducting pump-and-dump schemes involving stocks they were touting in their supposedly independent newsletters. The SEC alleges that&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Fraudulent News Letters Used In Pump-and-Dump Schemes – Boca Raton, Florida Investment and <a href="../../../../Securities-Commodities-and-Precious-Metals-Terms/Microcap-Stocks.shtml" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Penny Stock</a> Litigation Attorney</h2>


<p>SEC Charges Three Penny Stock Promoters Behind Pump-and-Dump Schemes</p>


<p>The Securities and Exchange Commission recently charged three penny stock promoters with conducting pump-and-dump schemes involving stocks they were touting in their supposedly independent newsletters.</p>


<p>The SEC alleges that Anthony Thompson, Jay Fung, and Eric Van Nguyen worked in coordinated fashion to gain control of a large portion of shares in the stock of microcap companies and then hyped those stocks in newsletters they distributed to prospective investors. After creating demand for the stock and increasing the value, they sold their holdings at the higher prices and earned significant profits. Once they stopped their promotional efforts, the demand for the stocks subsided and the prices dropped, leaving investors who had purchased the promoters’ shares with significant losses.</p>


<p>According to the SEC’s complaint filed in federal court in Manhattan, the newsletters published by Thompson, Fung, and Van Nguyen misleadingly stated that they “may” or “might” sell shares they owned when in reality their intentions always were to sell the stocks they were promoting. In fact, in some instances they already were selling the stocks to which they were saying “may” or “might” sell. They also failed to fully disclose in their newsletters the amounts of compensation they were receiving for promoting the stocks, cloaking the fact that they were coordinating their promotion of the penny stocks to deliberately increase the prices and dump their own shares.</p>


<p>According to the SEC’s complaint, the three promoters conducted five separate schemes that resulted in more than $10 million in ill-gotten gains. The penny stocks they manipulated were Blast Applications Inc., Smart Holdings Inc., Blue Gem Enterprise Inc., Lyric Jeans Inc., and Mass Hysteria Entertainment Company Inc. Thompson, who lives in Bethesda, Md., distributed several electronic penny stock promotion <a href="../../../../Investment-Related-Information/Online-Investment-Newsletters-Real-or-Fake.shtml" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">newsletters</a> with such names as FreeInvestmentReport.com and OxofWallStreet.com. Fung, who resides in Delray Beach, Fla., distributed his newsletters at such websites as PennyPic.com, and Van Nguyen was typically based in Canada and distributed electronic penny stock promotion newsletters on such websites as UnrealStocks.com and InsanePicks.com.</p>


<p>The SEC’s complaint names two relief defendants for the purposes of recovering money in their possession that resulted from the schemes. Thompson’s wife Kendall Thompson received $200,000 in proceeds from one of the stock manipulation schemes. John Babikian, who operated a penny stock promotion business primarily from a website named AwesomePennyStocks.com, received $1 million as a result of one of the schemes. In a separate SEC case involving a different scheme, a court ordered $3.73 million in sanctions against Babikian.</p>


<p>The SEC’s complaint charges Thompson, Fung, and Van Nguyen with violating the antifraud and anti-touting provisions of the federal securities laws and related rules. The SEC is seeking disgorgement of ill-gotten gains from the schemes plus prejudgment interest and penalties as well as permanent injunctions against further violations of the securities laws.</p>


<p>Thompson and Fung also were named in a separate SEC case for their roles in a Florida-based scheme in which they promoted a penny stock in their newsletters without adequately disclosing they were selling their shares in the same stock and receiving compensation for their promotional efforts. A court issued a final judgment requiring them to pay more than $1 million combined.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Boca Raton, Florida Preferred Stock and Limited Partnership Fraud and Misrepresentation Attorney]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/boca_raton_florida_preferred_stock_and_limited_partnership_fraud_and_misrepresentation_attorney/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/boca_raton_florida_preferred_stock_and_limited_partnership_fraud_and_misrepresentation_attorney/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2014 15:55:55 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Limited Partnership Fraud and Mismanagement]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Oil and Gas Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Sales of Unregistered Securities]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions 2014]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Boca Raton, Florida Preferred Stock and Limited Partnership Fraud and Misrepresentation Attorney: SEC Charges Principals of a Texas Oil and Gas Company with Conducting a Fraudulent Offering of Preferred Stock and Limited Partnership Interests, and Charges Seller with Acting as an Unregistered Broker Securities and Exchange Commission v. Paul R. Downey, et al., Civil Action&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Boca Raton, Florida <a href="../../../../Securities-Commodities-and-Precious-Metals-Terms/Preferred-Stocks.shtml" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Preferred Stock</a> and Limited Partnership Fraud and Misrepresentation Attorney:</h2>


<p>SEC Charges Principals of a Texas Oil and Gas Company with Conducting a Fraudulent Offering of Preferred Stock and Limited Partnership Interests, and Charges Seller with Acting as an Unregistered Broker</p>


<p>Securities and Exchange Commission v. Paul R. Downey, et al., Civil Action No. 1:14-CV-00185-C (N.D. Tex. Abilene Division)</p>


<p>Recently, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged two principals of Quest Energy Management Group, Inc. (Quest), Paul Downey of Naples, Florida and Jeffry Downey of Abilene, Texas, with conducting a fraudulent offering of preferred stock and limited partnership interests. The SEC also charged John Leonard, a salesman residing in Naples and Chicago, with acting as an unregistered broker in offering and selling the investment.</p>


<p>The SEC alleges that between January 2010 and May 2011, the father-son duo of Paul and Jeffry Downey used Quest, an Albany, Texas-based oil and gas company, to fraudulently offer Quest preferred stock and limited partnership units in an entity called Permian Advanced Oil Recovery Investment Fund I, LP (PAOR). Investors were told that PAOR would acquire working interests in oil and gas leases from Quest and receive revenue from those leases. With assistance from unregistered salesman John Leonard, the Downeys raised $4.8 million from approximately 17 investors. The PAOR offering was fraudulent on account of blatantly deceptive misstatements about Quest and PAOR. More particularly, the Downeys made false statements in the private placement memorandum about the financial viability of Quest; the purchase debt and liens associated with certain leases in which PAOR was acquiring an interest; the current and projected petroleum production from the leases; the use of investor funds raised in the offering; independent audits of PAOR; and foreseeable litigation against Quest and the Downeys.</p>


<p>On May 24, 2013, the U. S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division, appointed Burton Wiand, a Tampa attorney, as receiver over Quest, based on Quest’s receipt of funds from a Ponzi scheme conducted by Arthur Nadel and others. In re Arthur Nadel, et al., Lit. Rel. No. 20858 (January 21, 2009). The receivership is ongoing.</p>


<p>The SEC’s complaint against the Downeys and Leonard alleges that the Downeys violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and that Leonard violated Section 15(a) of the Exchange Act. The SEC’s complaint seeks from the Downeys and Leonard disgorgement of ill-gotten gains with prejudgment interest, civil penalties, and permanent injunctive relief, and additionally against the Downeys, officer and director bars.</p>


<p><strong><a href="../../../../Attorney-Profile/index.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><strong>Contact Us:</strong></a></strong></p>


<p>With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of elder abuse, exploitation and securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation.</p>


<p>At the Boca Raton Law Office of Russell L. Forkey, we represent clients throughout South and Central Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Sunrise, Plantation, Coral Springs, Deerfield Beach, Pompano Beach, Delray, Boynton Beach, Hollywood, Lake Worth, Royal Palm Beach, Manalapan, Jupiter, Gulf Stream, Wellington, Fort Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jupiter, Miami, Orlando, Maitland, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Heathrow, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa Beach, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormand Beach, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Dade County, Orange County, Seminole County, Martin County, Brevard County, Indian River County, Volusia County and Monroe County, Florida. The law office of Russell L. Forkey also represents South American, Canadian and other foreign residents that do business with U.S. financial institutions, investment advisors, brokerage and precious metal firms.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[False and Misleading Press Releases and Marketing Material – Boca Raton, Florida FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/false_and_misleading_press_releases_and_marketing_material_-_boca_raton_florida_finra_arbitration_an/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/false_and_misleading_press_releases_and_marketing_material_-_boca_raton_florida_finra_arbitration_an/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2014 15:32:25 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Penny Stock Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions 2014]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities and Securities Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>False and Misleading Press Releases and Marketing Material (Pump and Dump) – Boca Raton, Florida FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney SEC Charges Penny Stock Company Executives in New Jersey With Issuing False Press Releases to Inflate Stock Price The Securities and Exchange Commission recently charged father-and-son executives at a New Jersey-based penny stock company for&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<h2 class="wp-block-heading">False and Misleading Press Releases and Marketing Material (<a href="../../../../Elder-Abuse-Financial-Fraud/Pump-and-Dump-Scheme.shtml" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Pump and Dump</a>) – Boca Raton, Florida FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney</h2>


<p>SEC Charges Penny Stock Company Executives in New Jersey With Issuing False Press Releases to Inflate Stock Price</p>


<p>The Securities and Exchange Commission recently charged father-and-son executives at a New Jersey-based penny stock company for issuing false and misleading press releases while secretly selling thousands of their own stock shares into the market. They agreed to pay nearly $325,000 and accept officer-and-director bars to settle the SEC’s charges.</p>


<p>Conolog Corporation’s public filings state that it manufactures communications equipment primarily for use by electric utilities, fiber optic service providers, and the military. The SEC alleges that Conolog issued three consecutive press releases in early 2010 with distorted information at the behest of chairman and then-CEO Robert Benou with assistance from his son and company president Marc Benou. Among the company’s mischaracterizations were that Conolog had secured $1.9 million in new equipment orders when, in fact, only $50,000 worth of new orders had been received at the time. Conolog also created the misimpression that it had developed new fiber optic technology that was fully vetted and ready for commercial use and sale. Marc Benou was quoted saying it “surpassed our expectations in field tests” when in reality there had been no independent third-party testing as implied in the press release. The “testing” was merely an in-house demonstration of the product.</p>


<p>According to the SEC’s complaint filed in federal court in Newark, N.J., Robert Benou hired a public relations firm to promote Conolog’s stock using the false and misleading statements from the press releases. The promotional efforts significantly increased the company’s stock price and trading volume, and Robert and Marc Benou made combined profits of more than $81,000 through undisclosed sales of some of their stock holdings at the artificially inflated prices. They also each violated the federal securities laws requiring company insiders to disclose information about their holdings and transactions in company stock so other investors are aware of their moves.</p>


<p>The SEC’s complaint charges Conolog Corporation and the Benous with violating the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws. The complaint charges Robert and Marc Benou with violating securities law provisions requiring officers and directors of public companies to report their transactions in the company’s stock within two business days, and requiring all owners of more than 5 percent of a company’s stock to timely report the size of their holdings and any material changes to them.</p>


<p>Robert Benou agreed to settle the charges without admitting or denying the allegations by paying $77,490 in disgorgement of illegal profits made from selling Conolog stock as the misleading press releases were issued. He also must pay prejudgment interest of $12,400 and a penalty of $177,490, and will be permanently barred from acting as an officer or director of a public company or participating in penny stock offerings. Marc Benou agreed to settle the charges by paying disgorgement of $4,191 plus prejudgment interest of $671 and a penalty of $51,250. He will be barred for at least two years from acting as an officer or director of a public company or participating in penny stock offerings. The settlement is subject to court approval.</p>


<p><strong>Contact Us:</strong></p>


<p>With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of elder abuse, exploitation and securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation.</p>


<p>At the Boca Raton Law Office of Russell L. Forkey, we represent clients throughout South and Central Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Sunrise, Plantation, Coral Springs, Deerfield Beach, Pompano Beach, Delray, Boynton Beach, Hollywood, Lake Worth, Royal Palm Beach, Manalapan, Jupiter, Gulf Stream, Wellington, Fort Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jupiter, Miami, Orlando, Maitland, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Heathrow, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa Beach, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormand Beach, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Dade County, Orange County, Seminole County, Martin County, Brevard County, Indian River County, Volusia County and Monroe County, Florida. The law office of Russell L. Forkey also represents South American, Canadian and other foreign residents that do business with U.S. financial institutions, investment advisors, brokerage and precious metal firms.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Fraudulent Day Trading Scheme – Boca Raton, Florida Fraud and Misrepresentation FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/fraudulent_day_trading_scheme_-_boca_raton_florida_fraud_and_misrepresentation_finra_arbitration_and/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/fraudulent_day_trading_scheme_-_boca_raton_florida_fraud_and_misrepresentation_finra_arbitration_and/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2014 16:03:43 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Commercial and Business Dispute Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Federal Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[FINRA Arbitration]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Fraud and Misrepresentation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Online Trading Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions 2014]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Boca Raton, Florida – Fraudulent Day Trading Scheme FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney: SEC Charges Unregistered Broker in Tampa Area With Stealing From Investors in Fraudulent Day Trading Scheme The Securities and Exchange Commission recently charged an unregistered broker living outside Tampa, Fla., with stealing investor funds as part of a fraudulent day trading scheme.&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Boca Raton, Florida – Fraudulent Day Trading Scheme FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney:</h2>


<p><strong>SEC Charges Unregistered Broker in Tampa Area With Stealing From Investors in Fraudulent Day Trading Scheme</strong></p>


<p>The Securities and Exchange Commission recently charged an unregistered broker living outside Tampa, Fla., with stealing investor funds as part of a fraudulent day trading scheme.</p>


<p>The SEC alleges that Albert J. Scipione and his business partner solicited investors to establish accounts at their company called Traders Café for the purposes of day trading, which entails the rapid buying and selling of stocks throughout the day in hope that the stock values continue climbing or falling for the seconds to minutes they own them so they can lock in quick profits. Scipione touted Traders Café’s software trading platform and made a series of false misrepresentations to investors about low commissions and fees, high trading leverage, and safety of their assets. More than $500,000 was raised from investors who were assured that funds invested with Traders Café would be segregated and used only for day trading or other specific business purposes. However, many customers encountered technical service problems that prevented them from trading at all, and Scipione and his business partner squandered nearly all of the money in investor accounts for their personal use. Meanwhile, Traders Café was never registered with the SEC as a broker-dealer as required under the federal securities laws.</p>


<p>The SEC previously charged Scipione’s business partner Matthew P. Ionno, who agreed to settle the case and has been barred from the securities industry. Financial penalties will be decided by the court at a later date.</p>


<p>In a parallel action, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Florida today announced that Scipione has pleaded guilty to criminal charges. The U.S. Attorney’s Office previously brought a criminal case against Ionno.</p>


<p>According to the SEC’s complaint filed against Scipione in federal court in Tampa, customers across the country deposited approximately $367,000 with Traders Café from December 2012 to October 2013 with the intention of opening day trading accounts. Traders Café also received approximately $150,000 from an investor who invested directly in Traders Café’s business. Customers encountered problems with Traders Café from the outset, and many of them cancelled their accounts and requested refunds of their remaining account balances. Scipione and Ionno tried to cover up their fraudulent scheme by offering excuses and delays for why customers could not get refunds. Eventually less than $1,200 remained in Traders Café’s accounts primarily due to the repeated misuse of investor funds by Scipione and Ionno.</p>


<p>The SEC previously charged Scipione’s business partner Matthew P. Ionno, who agreed to settle the case and has been barred from the securities industry. Financial penalties will be decided by the court at a later date.</p>


<p>In a parallel action, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Florida today announced that Scipione has pleaded guilty to criminal charges. The U.S. Attorney’s Office previously brought a criminal case against Ionno.</p>


<p>According to the SEC’s complaint filed against Scipione in federal court in Tampa, customers across the country deposited approximately $367,000 with Traders Café from December 2012 to October 2013 with the intention of opening day trading accounts. Traders Café also received approximately $150,000 from an investor who invested directly in Traders Café’s business. Customers encountered problems with Traders Café from the outset, and many of them cancelled their accounts and requested refunds of their remaining account balances. Scipione and Ionno tried to cover up their fraudulent scheme by offering excuses and delays for why customers could not get refunds. Eventually less than $1,200 remained in Traders Café’s accounts primarily due to the repeated misuse of investor funds by Scipione and Ionno.</p>


<p>The SEC’s complaint against Scipione alleges that he violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 as well as Section 15(a) and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5. The SEC seeks disgorgement of ill-gotten gains, financial penalties, and permanent injunctive relief to enjoin Scipione from future violations of the federal securities laws.</p>


<p><strong>Contact Us:</strong></p>


<p>With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of elder abuse, exploitation and securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation.</p>


<p>At the Boca Raton Law Office of Russell L. Forkey, we represent clients throughout South and Central Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Sunrise, Plantation, Coral Springs, Deerfield Beach, Pompano Beach, Delray, Boynton Beach, Hollywood, Lake Worth, Royal Palm Beach, Manalapan, Jupiter, Gulf Stream, Wellington, Fort Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jupiter, Miami, Orlando, Maitland, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Heathrow, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa Beach, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormand Beach, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Dade County, Orange County, Seminole County, Martin County, Brevard County, Indian River County, Volusia County and Monroe County, Florida. The law office of Russell L. Forkey also represents South American, Canadian and other foreign residents that do business with U.S. financial institutions, investment advisors, brokerage and precious metal firms.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[SEC Charges Business Owner and Stockbroker in Real Estate Offering Fraud]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/sec_charges_business_owner_and_stockbroker_in_real_estate_offering_fraud/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/sec_charges_business_owner_and_stockbroker_in_real_estate_offering_fraud/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2014 21:22:04 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Commercial and Business Dispute Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Real Estate Investment Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions 2014]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities and Securities Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Boca Raton, Florida Real Estate Investment and Offering Fraud FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney: SEC Charges Business Owner and Stockbroker in Maryland-Based Real Estate Offering Fraud The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged the owner of a Maryland-based real estate company with conducting an offering fraud and spending investor money on such personal expenses as&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Boca Raton, Florida Real Estate Investment and Offering Fraud FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney:</h2>


<p>SEC Charges Business Owner and Stockbroker in Maryland-Based Real Estate Offering Fraud</p>


<p>The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged the owner of a Maryland-based real estate company with conducting an offering fraud and spending investor money on such personal expenses as his mortgage, country club dues, and season tickets to the Baltimore Ravens. The agency also charged a former stockbroker for participating in the scheme.</p>


<p><strong><a href="../../../../Attorney-Profile/index.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank"><strong>Contact Us:</strong></a></strong></p>


<p>With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of elder abuse, exploitation and securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation.</p>


<p>At the Boca Raton Law Office of Russell L. Forkey, we represent clients throughout South and Central Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Sunrise, Plantation, Coral Springs, Deerfield Beach, Pompano Beach, Delray, Boynton Beach, Hollywood, Lake Worth, Royal Palm Beach, Manalapan, Jupiter, Gulf Stream, Wellington, Fort Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jupiter, Miami, Orlando, Maitland, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Heathrow, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa Beach, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormand Beach, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Dade County, Orange County, Seminole County, Martin County, Brevard County, Indian River County, Volusia County and Monroe County, Florida. The law office of Russell L. Forkey also represents South American, Canadian and other foreign residents that do business with U.S. financial institutions, investment advisors, brokerage and precious metal firms.</p>


<p><strong>SEC Charges Business Owner and Stockbroker in Maryland-Based Real Estate Offering Fraud</strong></p>


<p>The Securities and Exchange Commission recently charged the owner of a Maryland-based real estate company with conducting an offering fraud and spending investor money on such personal expenses as his mortgage, country club dues, and season tickets to the Baltimore Ravens. The agency also charged a former stockbroker for participating in the scheme.</p>


<p>The SEC alleges that Wilfred T. Azar III sold investors purported bonds in his company Empire Corporation, which he touted as a successful and profitable business with the resources to pay promised annual returns of 10 percent. Along with Joseph A. Giordano, Azar and his company raised more than $7 million by making these and other false and misleading statements exaggerating the safety and low risk of the bonds. However, Empire Corporation was functionally insolvent in reality, and despite saying investor funds would be used for various corporate purposes, Azar used the money to pay personal expenses as well as thousands of dollars in compensation to Giordano for participating in the fraud. Giordano also steered a mutual fund that he managed into purchasing the bonds despite knowing the company was nearly broke. The scheme collapsed when they were unable to recruit new investors to fund Empire Corporation’s operations and repay existing investors, who did not receive their promised returns and lost substantially all of their investments.</p>


<p>In a parallel case, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Maryland today announced criminal charges against Azar.</p>


<p>The SEC’s complaint filed in federal court in Baltimore charges Empire Corporation, Azar, and Giordano with violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 as well as Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5. The complaint also charges Giordano with violations of Sections 206(1), 206(2) and 206(4) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and Rule 206(4)-8 as well as Section 34(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940. The SEC seeks disgorgement plus prejudgment interest and penalties as well as permanent injunctions. The agency is seeking an officer-and-director bar against Azar.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Boca Raton, Florida Misappropriation and Theft Litigation and Arbitration Attorney]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/boca_raton_florida_misappropriation_and_theft_litigation_and_arbitration_attorney/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/boca_raton_florida_misappropriation_and_theft_litigation_and_arbitration_attorney/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2014 02:00:09 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Breach of Fiduciary Duty]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Broker/Dealer]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Commercial and Business Dispute Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Federal Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Fraud and Misrepresentation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions 2014]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities and Securities Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[State Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Theft]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Boca Raton, Florida Misappropriation and Theft Litigation and Arbitration Attorney: Securities and Exchange Commission v. Dennis F. Wright, Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-01896-SHR (M.D. Pa) Final Judgment and Administrative Order Entered Against Pennsylvania-Based Registered Representative Who Stole Funds from Customers The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) recently announced that the United States District Court for&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Boca Raton, Florida Misappropriation and Theft Litigation and Arbitration Attorney:</h2>


<p><strong><em>Securities and Exchange Commission v. Dennis F. Wright</em>, Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-01896-SHR (M.D. Pa)</strong></p>


<p><strong>Final Judgment and Administrative Order Entered Against Pennsylvania-Based Registered Representative Who Stole Funds from Customers</strong></p>


<p>The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) recently announced that the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania entered a final judgment by consent in a previously filed enforcement action against defendant Dennis F. Wright, a former registered representative based in Lewistown, Pennsylvania.  The final judgment permanently enjoins Wright from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. Wright is also ordered to disgorge his ill-gotten gains of $1,533,416.33 and prejudgment interest thereon of $490,618.77, which will be deemed satisfied by the entry of an order of restitution in a parallel criminal case.</p>


<p>According to the Commission’s complaint filed on September 30, 2014, Wright misappropriated more than $1.5 million from at least 28 customers.  Wright fraudulently induced his customers to redeem securities held in their securities accounts, including variable annuities and mutual funds, by falsely representing that he would invest the proceeds from the redemptions in a managed account that held other securities that yielded higher returns than their existing securities accounts. Instead, Wright deposited his customers’ funds in a bank account he controlled and from which he misappropriated the funds in order to pay his personal expenses as well as to fund customer withdrawals. Wright concealed his fraud by providing his customers with falsified account statements purportedly showing that they had purchased and owned interests in the non-existent managed accounts with appreciating balances.</p>


<p>On October 16, 2014, the Commission issued an Order Instituting Administrative Proceedings Pursuant to Section 15(b)(6) of the Securities and Exchange Act and Section 203(f) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, Making Findings, and Imposing Remedial Sanctions (“”Order”) against Wright. The Order permanently bars Wright from association with any broker, dealer, investment adviser, municipal securities dealer, municipal advisor, transfer agent, or nationally recognized statistical rating organization; and also bars him from participating in any offering of a penny stock. Wright consented to the issuance of the Order.</p>


<p><strong><a href="../../../../Attorney-Profile/index.html" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">Contact Us:</a></strong></p>


<p>With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of elder abuse, exploitation and securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation.</p>


<p>At the Boca Raton Law Office of Russell L. Forkey, we represent clients throughout South and Central Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Sunrise, Plantation, Coral Springs, Deerfield Beach, Pompano Beach, Delray, Boynton Beach, Hollywood, Lake Worth, Royal Palm Beach, Manalapan, Jupiter, Gulf Stream, Wellington, Fort Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jupiter, Miami, Orlando, Maitland, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Heathrow, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa Beach, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormand Beach, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Dade County, Orange County, Seminole County, Martin County, Brevard County, Indian River County, Volusia County and Monroe County, Florida. The law office of Russell L. Forkey also represents South American, Canadian and other foreign residents that do business with U.S. financial institutions, investment advisors, brokerage and precious metal firms.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Anthony Coronati and Bidtoask LLC. – Boca Raton, Florida Investment and Advertising]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/anthony_coronati_and_bidtoask_llc_-_boca_raton_florida_investment_and_advertising/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/anthony_coronati_and_bidtoask_llc_-_boca_raton_florida_investment_and_advertising/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2014 01:38:43 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Commercial and Business Dispute Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[False and Misleading Sales Material]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Federal Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Fraud and Misrepresentation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Hedge Fund Fraud News]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Investment Advisor]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Ponzi Scheme News]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Private Placements / Direct Investments]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Research and Credit Rating Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Sales of Unregistered Securities]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions 2014]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities and Securities Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[State Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Theft]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Boca Raton, Florida Investment and Advertising Fraud and Misrepresentation FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney: SEC Charges Staten Island Man With Conducting Fraudulent Offerings and Stealing Investor Funds The Securities and Exchange Commission trecently charged the operator of an online stock recommendation business with conducting several fraudulent securities offerings and siphoning some of the money raised&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p><strong>Boca Raton, Florida Investment and Advertising Fraud and Misrepresentation FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney:</strong></p>


<p><strong>SEC Charges Staten Island Man With Conducting Fraudulent Offerings and Stealing Investor Funds</strong></p>


<p>The Securities and Exchange Commission trecently charged the operator of an online stock recommendation business with conducting several fraudulent securities offerings and siphoning some of the money raised from investors for a Caribbean vacation and plastic surgery.</p>


<p>An SEC investigation found that Anthony Coronati, who lives on Staten Island, initially held himself out as an investment adviser to a hedge fund that he claimed would invest in equity securities.  But the hedge fund was fictitious and Coronati used investor money for other purposes.  When the money began drying up, he went on to defraud investors in additional schemes involving his New Jersey-based company Bidtoask LLC. Coronati and Bidtoask sold membership interests in the company for the purpose of investing in promising technology companies that had yet to hold initial public offerings (IPOs).  Investors were told that Bidtoask would invest directly in pre-IPO Facebook shares without charging any fees, commissions, or markups to investors.  However, Bidtoask’s Facebook-related investments actually did require the payment of significant fees that Coronati and Bidtoask concealed from investors.  Bidtoask did not even own the shares of other technology companies in which it was supposedly investing, and these companies were not actually in the process of an IPO.</p>


<p>Coronati and Bidtoask have agreed to settle the SEC’s charges. Coronati must pay back $400,000 in funds stolen from investors, and the money will be deposited into a Fair Fund for distribution to victims of the fraud schemes. Coronati also agreed to be permanently barred from the securities industry.</p>


<p>Coronati, who operates the website BidToAsk.com that offers stock recommendations to subscribers, was the subject of a <a>subpoena enforcement action filed by the SEC late last year</a>when he failed to produce documents or appear for scheduled testimony during the SEC’s investigation.  As a result of his continued failure to comply with SEC subpoenas in spite of a court order, <a>Coronati was held in contempt of court and arrested earlier this year</a>.</p>


<p>According to the SEC’s order instituting a settled administrative proceeding, Coronati conducted his schemes from at least 2009 to 2013. As the various schemes unraveled, he faced increasing concerns from investors.  Coronati placated certain investors by making Ponzi-like payments to them using other investors’ money, and he sent a phony account statement to at least one investor purporting a position in the fake hedge fund that was worth more than $120,000. The account statement also purported that the fictitious hedge fund was more than 80 percent invested in well-known public companies such as Apple. Meanwhile, Coronati used investor funds to pay business expenses and such personal expenses as the Caribbean vacation and plastic surgery, and he also used investor money to purchase securities in a personal brokerage account he held in his own name.</p>


<p>The SEC’s order finds that Coronati and Bidtoask violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5. Coronati additionally violated Sections 206(1), 206(2), 206(4) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and Rule 206(4)-8.  Without admitting or denying the findings, Coronati and Bidtoask consented to the SEC’s order requiring them to cease and desist from further violations of those provisions of the securities laws and SEC rules. Information about the Fair Fund will be available at: <a href="http://www.sec.gov/litigation/fairfundlist.htm" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">www.sec.gov/litigation/fairfundlist.htm</a>.</p>


<p><strong>Contact Us:</strong></p>


<p>With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of elder abuse, exploitation and securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation.</p>


<p>At the Boca Raton Law Office of Russell L. Forkey, we represent clients throughout South and Central Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Sunrise, Plantation, Coral Springs, Deerfield Beach, Pompano Beach, Delray, Boynton Beach, Hollywood, Lake Worth, Royal Palm Beach, Manalapan, Jupiter, Gulf Stream, Wellington, Fort Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jupiter, Miami, Orlando, Maitland, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Heathrow, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa Beach, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormand Beach, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Dade County, Orange County, Seminole County, Martin County, Brevard County, Indian River County, Volusia County and Monroe County, Florida. The law office of Russell L. Forkey also represents South American, Canadian and other foreign residents that do business with U.S. financial institutions, investment advisors, brokerage and precious metal firms.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Wealth Strategy Partners, LC, Harvey Altholtz, Stevens Resource Group, LLC and George Stevens – Boca Raton, Florida Investment Fund and Investment Advisor Fraud and Mismanagement Litigation and Arbitration Attorney]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/wealth_strategy_partners_lc_harvey_altholtz_stevens_resource_group_llc_and_george_stevens_-_boca_rat/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/wealth_strategy_partners_lc_harvey_altholtz_stevens_resource_group_llc_and_george_stevens_-_boca_rat/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 13:18:59 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Commercial and Business Dispute Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Elder Abuse]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Federal Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Investment Advisor]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions 2014]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities and Securities Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Wealth Strategy Partners, LC, Harvey Altholtz, Stevens Resource Group, LLC and George Stevens – Boca Raton, Florida Investment Fund and Investment Advisor Fraud and Mismanagement Litigation and Arbitration Attorney Securities and Exchange Commission v. Wealth Strategy Partners, LC, et al., Civil Action No. 14-CV-02427-JDW-TGW SEC Charges General Partner and Investment Advisers to the Stealth and&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Wealth Strategy Partners, LC, Harvey Altholtz, Stevens Resource Group, LLC and George Stevens – Boca Raton, Florida Investment Fund and Investment Advisor Fraud and Mismanagement Litigation and Arbitration Attorney</h2>


<p><strong><em>Securities and Exchange Commission v. Wealth Strategy Partners, LC, et al.</em>, Civil Action No. 14-CV-02427-JDW-TGW</strong></p>


<p><strong>SEC Charges General Partner and Investment Advisers to the Stealth and Adamas Funds with Fraud</strong></p>


<p>The Securities and Exchange Commission filed a civil injunctive action on September 25, 2014 charging Wealth Strategy Partners, LC (“Wealth Strategy”), a Sarasota, Florida company, and its principal, Harvey Altholtz of Sarasota, Florida, and Stevens Resource Group, LLC (“Stevens Resource”), a Washington company, and its principal, George Stevens of Lacey, Washington, with securities fraud involving the fraudulent offers and sales of securities in two investment funds – The Stealth Fund, LLLP and The Adamas Fund, LLLP. Wealth Strategy and Altholtz controlled and managed the two funds and later served as investment advisers to the funds. Stevens Resource and Stevens also served as investment advisers to both funds.</p>


<p>According to the Commission’s complaint filed in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, the Stealth and Adamas Funds, combined, raised approximately $30.8 million from over 143 investors nationwide between 2007 and November, 2009. The complaint alleges that, from October 2008 through April 2010, the defendants failed to disclose in offering materials distributed to investors that Stealth’s assets could be used to guarantee certain loans that Altholtz’s family made to two portfolio companies that Stealth invested in and that his family also made loans to Adamas and Stealth in violation of the funds’ operating agreements. The complaint also alleges that Wealth Strategy and Altholtz committed fraud by giving an Altholtz family trust, who was an investor in Adamas, preferential treatment with regard to redemptions over other investors. The complaint further alleges that the defendants made misstatements and omissions in newsletters to investors regarding the financial condition of some of the funds’ portfolio companies.</p>


<p>The SEC’s complaint charges the defendants with violations of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 206(4) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and Rule 206(4)-8 thereunder. The complaint seeks permanent injunctions, disgorgement plus prejudgment interest, and civil penalties against all of the defendants, and officer and director bars against Altholtz and Stevens. Stevens and Stevens Resource have agreed to settle the case against them by consenting to, among other things, the entry of a judgment permanently enjoining them from future violations of the securities laws, imposing a permanent officer and director bar against Stevens, and ordering them to pay disgorgement and civil penalties, in amounts to be determined by the Court later.</p>


<p><strong>Contact Us:</strong></p>


<p>With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of elder abuse, exploitation and securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation.</p>


<p>At the Boca Raton Law Office of Russell L. Forkey, we represent clients throughout South and Central Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Sunrise, Plantation, Coral Springs, Deerfield Beach, Pompano Beach, Delray, Boynton Beach, Hollywood, Lake Worth, Royal Palm Beach, Manalapan, Jupiter, Gulf Stream, Wellington, Fort Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jupiter, Miami, Orlando, Maitland, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Heathrow, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa Beach, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormand Beach, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Dade County, Orange County, Seminole County, Martin County, Brevard County, Indian River County, Volusia County and Monroe County, Florida. The law office of Russell L. Forkey also represents South American, Canadian and other foreign residents that do business with U.S. financial institutions, investment advisors, brokerage and precious metal firms.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Oscar F. Villarreal – Boca Raton, Florida Investment and Investment Advisor Fraud Litigation and Arbitration Attorney]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/oscar_f_villarreal_-_boca_raton_florida_investment_and_and_investment_advisor_fraud_litigation_and_a/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/oscar_f_villarreal_-_boca_raton_florida_investment_and_and_investment_advisor_fraud_litigation_and_a/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 12:34:45 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Commercial and Business Dispute Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Elder Abuse]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Federal Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[FINRA Arbitration]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Fraud and Misrepresentation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Investment Advisor]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions 2014]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities and Securities Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Securities and Exchange Commission v. Oscar F. Villarreal, Civil Action No. 14-cv-01891 Former Cleveland-Area Investment Promoter Oscar F. Villarreal Indicted On September 16, 2014, the United States Attorney for the Northern District of Ohio obtained a Grand Jury indictment charging Oscar F. Villarreal with ten counts of wire fraud, seven counts of money laundering, one&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p><strong><em>Securities and Exchange Commission v. Oscar F. Villarreal</em>, Civil Action No. 14-cv-01891</strong></p>


<p><strong>Former Cleveland-Area Investment Promoter Oscar F. Villarreal Indicted</strong></p>


<p>On September 16, 2014, the United States Attorney for the Northern District of Ohio obtained a Grand Jury indictment charging Oscar F. Villarreal with ten counts of wire fraud, seven counts of money laundering, one count of securities fraud, and one count of investment adviser fraud.</p>


<p>The Indictment’s allegations are based on the same conduct underlying the Commission’s August 26, 2014 Complaint against Villarreal filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio.</p>


<p>The SEC’s Complaint alleges that from March 2009 through December 2010, Villarreal conducted a fraudulent offering, known as Fund III, which raised $9.2 million from 46 investors. According to the complaint, Villarreal told investors that their money was to be used to make private equity investments in companies in the petroleum, steel, and other industries in Mexico. Villarreal lied to these investors about the success of a previous fund he operated, lied in saying that he used their money to purchase and profitably operate a Mexican pipeline manufacturer, and lied by telling investors that Fund III had ownership interests in several U.S. and Mexican drilling companies. Villarreal instead used $7.4 million of Fund III assets to trade in publicly traded securities in a brokerage account-contrary to his representations to investors-and sustained heavy losses, and also stole $5.8 million for himself. By November 2011, Fund III was essentially insolvent.</p>


<p>The Commission’s complaint also alleges that, between August 2010 and March 2011, Villarreal conducted a second fraudulent offering, known as the Standard Asset Management Fund I, (“SAM Fund”), which raised $9 million from 11 investors, six of whom had previously invested in Fund III. According to the complaint, Villarreal told these investors that the SAM Fund would invest in companies listed on the Mexican stock exchange. Villarreal made numerous misrepresentations to these investors. Among other things, Villarreal repeated his earlier lies about Fund II and Fund III’s purported acquisition and profitable operation of a Mexican pipeline manufacturer, he stole at least $327,000 of SAM Fund assets, and Villarreal’s trading was a massive failure, resulting in an 83% loss for the SAM Fund.</p>


<p>The complaint also alleges that Villarreal defrauded the SAM Fund investors between March 2012 and May 2012 by offering to “exchange” limited partnership units he claimed he owned in Fund III for the SAM Fund investors’ limited partnership units in the SAM Fund. Eight SAM Fund investors accepted Villarreal’s offer and exchanged their SAM Fund units, which they had purchased for a total of $3.1 million. Villarreal, however, lied about the number of Fund III limited partnership units he owned and the value of the Fund III units. Villarreal did not disclose to these investors that the Fund III limited partnership units were worthless.</p>


<p>The SEC’s Complaint alleges that Villarreal violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, Sections 206(1), 206(2), and 206(4) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and Rule 206(4)-8 thereunder. The Commission’s complaint seeks a permanent injunction, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains plus prejudgment interest, and civil penalties.</p>


<p><strong>Contact Us:</strong></p>


<p>With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of elder abuse, exploitation and securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation.</p>


<p>At the Boca Raton Law Office of Russell L. Forkey, we represent clients throughout South and Central Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Sunrise, Plantation, Coral Springs, Deerfield Beach, Pompano Beach, Delray, Boynton Beach, Hollywood, Lake Worth, Royal Palm Beach, Manalapan, Jupiter, Gulf Stream, Wellington, Fort Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jupiter, Miami, Orlando, Maitland, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Heathrow, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa Beach, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormand Beach, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Dade County, Orange County, Seminole County, Martin County, Brevard County, Indian River County, Volusia County and Monroe County, Florida. The law office of Russell L. Forkey also represents South American, Canadian and other foreign residents that do business with U.S. financial institutions, investment advisors, brokerage and precious metal firms.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Patrick G. Rooney, John R. Rooney and Positron Corporation – Boca Raton, Florida Market Manipulation and Investment Fraud Litigation and Arbitration Attorney]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/patrick_g_rooney_john_r_rooney_and_positron_corporation_-_boca_raton_florida_market_manipulation_and/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/patrick_g_rooney_john_r_rooney_and_positron_corporation_-_boca_raton_florida_market_manipulation_and/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2014 12:14:29 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Commercial and Business Dispute Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Elder Abuse]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[FINRA Arbitration]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Fraud and Misrepresentation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Penny Stock Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions 2014]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities and Securities Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[State Litigation]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Patrick G. Rooney, John R. Rooney and Positron Corporation – Boca Raton, Florida Market Manipulation and Investment Fraud Litigation and Arbitration Attorney SEC v. Patrick G. Rooney, John R. Rooney, and Positron Corporation, Civil Action No. 9:14-cv-81224-KAM (U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida) The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that on September&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p><strong>Patrick G. Rooney, John R. Rooney and Positron Corporation – Boca Raton, Florida Market Manipulation and Investment Fraud Litigation and Arbitration Attorney</strong></p>


<p><strong><em>SEC v. Patrick G. Rooney, John R. Rooney, and Positron Corporation</em>, Civil Action No. 9:14-cv-81224-KAM (U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida)</strong></p>


<p>The Securities and Exchange Commission announced that on September 30, 2014 it filed a civil injunctive action charging Positron Corporation, a microcap company based in Westmont, Ill., Patrick G. Rooney of Oak Brook, Ill., the company’s then-CEO, and John R. Rooney of Jupiter, Fla., a penny stock promoter, for orchestrating a market manipulation scheme involving the company’s stock.</p>


<p>According to the SEC’s complaint filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Positron Corporation, Patrick Rooney, and John Rooney, engaged in market manipulation fraud in which they made an inducement payment to a stock promoter who would purchase shares of Positron in the open market ahead of planned press releases to help them manipulate the stock. The SEC alleges that the scheme was designed to generate the appearance of market activity in the company’s stock to induce investors to purchase the stock and artificially increase the trading price and volume.</p>


<p>The SEC’s complaint alleges that the defendants violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rules 10b-5(a) and 10b-5(c). The SEC is seeking permanent injunctions and civil money penalties against all three defendants, as well as penny stock bars against both Patrick and John Rooney and an officer-and-director bar against Patrick Rooney.</p>


<p><strong>Contact Us:</strong></p>


<p>With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of elder abuse, exploitation and securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation.</p>


<p>At the Boca Raton Law Office of Russell L. Forkey, we represent clients throughout South and Central Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Sunrise, Plantation, Coral Springs, Deerfield Beach, Pompano Beach, Delray, Boynton Beach, Hollywood, Lake Worth, Royal Palm Beach, Manalapan, Jupiter, Gulf Stream, Wellington, Fort Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jupiter, Miami, Orlando, Maitland, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Heathrow, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa Beach, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormand Beach, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Dade County, Orange County, Seminole County, Martin County, Brevard County, Indian River County, Volusia County and Monroe County, Florida. The law office of Russell L. Forkey also represents South American, Canadian and other foreign residents that do business with U.S. financial institutions, investment advisors, brokerage and precious metal firms.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Scam Websites (Affinity Fraud) – Buyer Beware – South Florida Investment and Securities Fraud Litigation and Arbitration Attorney]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/scam_websites_affinity_fraud_-_buyer_beware_-_south_florida_investment_and_securities_fraud_litigati/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/scam_websites_affinity_fraud_-_buyer_beware_-_south_florida_investment_and_securities_fraud_litigati/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2014 11:50:58 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Affinity Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Commercial and Business Dispute Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Elder Abuse]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Federal Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[FINRA Arbitration]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Foreign Investors]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Ponzi Scheme News]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions 2014]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities and Securities Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Social Media Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[State Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Theft]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Affinity and Elder Financial Abuse and Exploitation Fraud, Misrepresentation and Theft – Boca Raton, Delray Beach, Lake Worth, Boynton Beach and Deerfield Beach, Florida Litigation and Arbitration Attorney: SEC Announces Cases Targeting International Pyramid Scheme Operators The Securities and Exchange Commission recently announced charges against the operators of an international pyramid scheme that raised more&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Affinity and Elder Financial Abuse and Exploitation Fraud, Misrepresentation and Theft – Boca Raton, Delray Beach, Lake Worth, Boynton Beach and Deerfield Beach, Florida Litigation and Arbitration Attorney:</h2>


<p><strong>SEC Announces Cases Targeting International Pyramid Scheme Operators</strong></p>


<p>The Securities and Exchange Commission recently announced charges against the operators of an international pyramid scheme that raised more than $129 million from investors worldwide, primarily in the U.S., China, and Taiwan. The case follows another against a separate pyramid scheme that lured investors in the U.S., China, and Korea with seminars, webinars, and YouTube videos.</p>


<p>The newest case, filed in federal court in San Francisco, charges Hong Kong-based eAdGear Holdings Limited and California-based eAdGear, Inc., along with operators Charles S. Wang and Qian Cathy Zhang, of Warren, N.J., and Francis Y. Yuen, of Dublin, Calif. According to the SEC complaint, even though eAdGear claimed to be a successful Internet marketing company, nearly all of its revenue was generated by investors, not its products or services.</p>


<p>The complaint alleges that eAdGear’s operators used money from new investors to pay earlier investors as well as to repay a personal loan and purchase million-dollar homes for themselves. It alleges the operators concealed and perpetuated the scheme by displaying sham websites on eAdGear’s own site to make it appear as if it had real, paying customers and manipulated revenue distributions to investors to appear profitable.</p>


<p>“eAdGear and its operators falsely claimed that they were running a profitable Internet marketing company when in reality, they were operating a Ponzi and pyramid scheme that preyed on Chinese communities and caused investors to lose millions of dollars,” said Jina L. Choi, director of the SEC’s San Francisco Regional Office.</p>


<p>The eAdGear case follows one filed Monday in federal court in Georgia against Zhunrize Inc. and CEO Jeff Pan for allegedly defrauding investors of more than $105 million since 2012. Despite its claims to be a legitimate multi-level marketing company, Zhunrize derived most of its funds from selling memberships, not products, according to the SEC complaint.</p>


<p>“Zhunrize claimed to offer investors the opportunity to be an ‘e-commerce Business Owner’ selling products to customers through a website. In fact, it was a pyramid and ‘profits’ came from fees paid by later investors,” said William Hicks, associate regional director of the SEC’s Atlanta Regional Office.</p>


<p>In both cases, the courts granted the SEC’s request for an asset freeze and issued a temporary restraining order. In the case of eAdGear, that order bars the defendants from soliciting investors, including through websites they have used until now – <a href="http://www.sec.gov/servlet/Satellite/goodbye/PressRelease/1370543050577?externalLink=http://www.eadgear.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">www.eadgear.com</a>, <a href="http://www.sec.gov/servlet/Satellite/goodbye/PressRelease/1370543050577?externalLink=http://www.eadgear.net" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">www.eadgear.net</a>, <a href="http://www.sec.gov/servlet/Satellite/goodbye/PressRelease/1370543050577?externalLink=http://www.winteam777.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">www.winteam777.com</a>, and <a href="http://www.sec.gov/servlet/Satellite/goodbye/PressRelease/1370543050577?externalLink=http://www.winteam168.com" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">www.winteam168.com</a>. A court hearing has been scheduled for October 10, 2014.</p>


<p><strong>Contact Us:</strong></p>


<p>With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of elder abuse, exploitation and securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation.</p>


<p>At the Fort Lauderdale Law Office of Russell L. Forkey, we represent clients throughout South and Central Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Sunrise, Plantation, Coral Springs, Deerfield Beach, Pompano Beach, Delray, Boynton Beach, Hollywood, Lake Worth, Royal Palm Beach, Manalapan, Jupiter, Gulf Stream, Wellington, Fort Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jupiter, Miami, Orlando, Maitland, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Heathrow, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa Beach, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormand Beach, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Dade County, Orange County, Seminole County, Martin County, Brevard County, Indian River County, Volusia County and Monroe County, Florida. The law office of Russell L. Forkey also represents South American, Canadian and other foreign residents that do business with U.S. financial institutions, investment advisors, brokerage and precious metal firms.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Annuity and Insurance Fraud and Misrepresentation – Boca Raton, West Palm Beach and Fort Lauderdale, Florida Litigation and Arbitration Attorney]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/annuity_and_insurance_fraud_and_misrepresentation_-_boca_raton_west_palm_beach_and_fort_lauderdale_f/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/annuity_and_insurance_fraud_and_misrepresentation_-_boca_raton_west_palm_beach_and_fort_lauderdale_f/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2014 11:39:03 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Affinity Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Annuity]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Commercial and Business Dispute Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Elder Abuse]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[False and Misleading Sales Material]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Federal Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[FINRA Arbitration]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Fraud and Misrepresentation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Insurance Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Insurance Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Insurance News]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[News of Interest to Seniors]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions 2014]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities and Securities Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[State Litigation]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Annuity and Insurance Fraud and Misrepresentation – Elder Financial Abuse and Exploitation Litigation and Arbitration Attorney: SEC Charges Four Insurance Agents in Securities Fraud Targeting Elderly Investors The Securities and Exchange Commission recently announced charges against four insurance agents for unlawfully selling securities in what turned out to be a multi-million dollar offering fraud targeting&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Annuity and Insurance Fraud and Misrepresentation – Elder Financial Abuse and Exploitation Litigation and Arbitration Attorney:</h2>


<p><strong>SEC Charges Four Insurance Agents in Securities Fraud Targeting Elderly Investors</strong></p>


<p>The Securities and Exchange Commission recently announced charges against four insurance agents for unlawfully selling securities in what turned out to be a multi-million dollar offering fraud targeting elderly investors.</p>


<p>The <a href="http://www.sec.gov/News/PressRelease/Detail/PressRelease/1370540397404" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank">SEC previously charged a Colorado man</a> who allegedly orchestrated the scheme and recruited active insurance agents to help him solicit investors in Colorado and several other states. The scheme raised approximately $4.3 million during a nearly 18-month period. The SEC’s investigation further found that the four insurance agents charged today solicited funds without registering with the SEC as a broker-dealer as required under the federal securities laws.</p>


<p>“When individuals act as a broker and sell securities to the public, they must comply with registration, supervision, and compliance requirements that exist to protect investors,” said Julie K. Lutz, Director of the SEC’s Denver Regional Office. “These insurance agents improperly operated outside of that regulatory framework and thereby placed their clients at risk.”</p>


<p>According to the SEC’s order instituting administrative proceedings, the scheme primarily targeted retired annuity holders by using insurance agents to sell interests in a company called Arete LLC, which was controlled by the Colorado man orchestrating the scheme: Gary Snisky. The insurance agents told investors that their funds would be used by Snisky to purchase government-backed agency bonds at a discount. However, Snisky did not purchase bonds or conduct any such trading, and he misappropriated approximately $2.8 million of investor funds to pay commissions and make personal mortgage payments.</p>


<p>The SEC’s Enforcement Division alleges that the following three brokers raised approximately $1.5 million for Snisky and received almost $90,000 in commissions:</p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li>Kenneth C. Meissner of Fair Oaks Branch, Texas</li>
<li>James Doug Scott of Perkasie, Penn.</li>
<li>Mark S. “Mike” Tomich of Belmont, Mich.</li>
</ul>


<p>The other insurance agent – David C. Sorrells of Linden, Texas – entered into a cooperation agreement with the SEC. Without admitting or denying the findings, Sorrells consented to an order finding that he violated Section 15(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. He agreed to be barred from the securities industry, cease and desist from future violations of Section 15(a), and pay disgorgement of $207,213.34. He also is subject to an additional financial penalty. The settlement reflects substantial assistance that Sorrells provided in the SEC’s investigation.</p>


<p>The SEC’s Enforcement Division alleges that Meissner, Scott, and Tomich violated Section 15(a) of the Exchange Act, and is seeking disgorgement, penalties, and securities industry bars in the matter, which will be litigated before an administrative law judge. The SEC’s case against Snisky, filed in November 2013, is still pending in federal court in Colorado.</p>


<p><strong>Contact Us:</strong></p>


<p>With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of elder abuse, exploitation and securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation.</p>


<p>At the Fort Lauderdale Law Office of Russell L. Forkey, we represent clients throughout South and Central Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Sunrise, Plantation, Coral Springs, Deerfield Beach, Pompano Beach, Delray, Boynton Beach, Hollywood, Lake Worth, Royal Palm Beach, Manalapan, Jupiter, Gulf Stream, Wellington, Fort Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jupiter, Miami, Orlando, Maitland, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Heathrow, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa Beach, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormand Beach, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Dade County, Orange County, Seminole County, Martin County, Brevard County, Indian River County, Volusia County and Monroe County, Florida. The law office of Russell L. Forkey also represents South American, Canadian and other foreign residents that do business with U.S. financial institutions, investment advisors, brokerage and precious metal firms.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Microcap and Penny Stock Market Manipulation and Fraud – Boca Raton, Florida Federal and State Court Litigation Attorney]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/microcap_and_penny_stock_market_manipulation_and_fraud_-_boca_raton_florida_federal_and_state_court/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/microcap_and_penny_stock_market_manipulation_and_fraud_-_boca_raton_florida_federal_and_state_court/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2014 19:51:37 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Commercial and Business Dispute Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Corporate Misconduct]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Elder Abuse]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Federal Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Fraud and Misrepresentation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Penny Stock Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions 2014]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities and Securities Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[State Litigation]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Microcap and Penny Stock Market Manipulation and Fraud – Boca Raton, Fort Lauderdale and West Palm Beach, Florida State and Federal Court Litigation Attorney: SEC Charges Eight for Roles in Widespread Pump-and-Dump Scheme Involving California-Based Microcap Company The Securities and Exchange Commission recently charged a ring of eight individuals for their roles in an alleged&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p><strong>Microcap and Penny Stock Market Manipulation and Fraud – Boca Raton, Fort Lauderdale and West Palm Beach, Florida State and Federal Court Litigation Attorney:</strong></p>


<p><strong>SEC Charges Eight for Roles in Widespread Pump-and-Dump Scheme Involving California-Based Microcap Company</strong></p>


<p>The Securities and Exchange Commission recently charged a ring of eight individuals for their roles in an alleged pump-and-dump scheme involving a penny stock company based in California that has repeatedly changed its name and purported line of business over the past several years.</p>


<p>The SEC alleges that the scheme was orchestrated by Izak Zirk de Maison, who was named Izak Zirk Engelbrecht before taking the surname of his wife Angelique de Maison. Both de Maisons are charged by the SEC in the case along with others enlisted to buy, sell, or promote stock in the company now called Gepco Ltd. Zirk de Maison installed some of these associates as officers and directors of Gepco while he secretly ran the company behind the scenes. Collectively, they amassed large blocks of shares of Gepco common stock while the de Maisons manipulated the market to create the appearance of genuine investor demand, allowing an associate to sell his stock at inflated prices to make hundreds of thousands of dollars in illicit profits.</p>


<p>In a parallel action, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Ohio and the Cleveland Division of the Federal Bureau of Investigation today announced criminal charges against Zirk de Maison.</p>


<p>The SEC has obtained an emergency court order to freeze the assets of the de Maisons and others who profited illegally through the alleged scheme.</p>


<p>According to the SEC’s complaint filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, Zirk de Maison has secretly controlled the shell company now known as Gepco since its incorporation in 2008 under a different name. During the next five years, he caused the company to enter into a number of reverse mergers and its reported business evolved from equipment leasing to prepaid stored value cards related to electronic devices until the company eventually became known as WikiFamilies and claimed to own and operate a social media website. The company name changed to Gepco in 2013, and after a failed attempt to merge it into a private mixed martial arts company, de Maison created his own private company purportedly in the high-end diamond business and merged Gepco into it.</p>


<p>The SEC alleges that the de Maisons, who reside in Redlands, Calif., brought at least six others into the fold to coordinate various components of the scheme. They each are charged in the SEC’s complaint:</p>


<ul class="wp-block-list">
<li><strong>Jason Cope</strong> of Gates Mills, Ohio, is a longtime associate of Zirk de Maison and has a past record of securities fraud with a court judgment against him in a previous SEC enforcement action. On Cope’s behalf, <strong>Louis</strong><strong> Mastromatteo</strong> of Bay Village, Ohio, allegedly dumped more than 2.5 million shares of Gepco stock through a nominee into the public market for hundreds of thousands of dollars in illicit profits that were kicked back to Cope.</li>
<li><strong>Trish Malone</strong>, who lives in Santee, Calif., serves as Gepco’s president, CFO, and secretary. She allegedly used Gepco to issue stock to Zirk de Maison and others so that they could conduct two unregistered and illegal distributions of the securities.</li>
<li><strong>Peter Voutsas</strong>, who lives in Santa Monica, Calif., and owns a jewelry store in Beverly Hills, serves as Gepco’s CEO and chief investment officer even though Zirk de Maison runs the company behind the scenes. Along with Angelique de Maison, Voutsas allegedly made a materially misleading statement about Gepco to the public while the de Maisons manipulated the market for Gepco’s stock.</li>
<li><strong>Ronald Loshin</strong> of San Anselmo, Calif., served as Gepco’s chief creative officer and allegedly failed to make required regulatory filings to report his transactions in Gepco stock as an insider. Furthermore, Loshin enabled de Maison to deceptively hide his own trading by allowing him to use a brokerage account held in Loshin’s name.</li>
<li><strong>Kieran Kuhn</strong> of Port Washington, N.Y., allegedly promoted Gepco stock through his firm Small Cap Resource Corp. and inflated the stock value to help the scheme succeed. He then conducted one of the unregistered and illegal distributions of Gepco-related securities for Zirk de Maison’s benefit. </li>
</ul>


<p>According to the SEC’s complaint, Zirk de Maison exchanged e-mails and text messages with many of his co-conspirators as they openly discussed coordinating their promotional activities and manipulative trading in Gepco’s stock in order to create a false impression of market activity. They stood to earn exponentially more illicit profits given that they continue to beneficially own tens of millions of shares of Gepco stock, so the SEC suspended trading in Gepco securities in order to prevent any further manipulation or dumping of the stock.</p>


<p>The SEC’s complaint, which additionally charges several companies connected to the scheme, alleges violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 9 and 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5. The complaint seeks a permanent injunction and disgorgement of ill-gotten gains along with prejudgment interest, financial penalties, and penny stock bars. The SEC also seeks officer-and-director bars against the de Maisons and Malone.</p>


<p><strong>Contact Us:</strong></p>


<p>With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of elder abuse, exploitation and securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation.</p>


<p>At the Fort Lauderdale Law Office of Russell L. Forkey, we represent clients throughout South and Central Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Sunrise, Plantation, Coral Springs, Deerfield Beach, Pompano Beach, Delray, Boynton Beach, Hollywood, Lake Worth, Royal Palm Beach, Manalapan, Jupiter, Gulf Stream, Wellington, Fort Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jupiter, Miami, Orlando, Maitland, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Heathrow, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa Beach, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormand Beach, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Dade County, Orange County, Seminole County, Martin County, Brevard County, Indian River County, Volusia County and Monroe County, Florida. The law office of Russell L. Forkey also represents South American, Canadian and other foreign residents that do business with U.S. financial institutions, investment advisors, brokerage and precious metal firms.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[South Florida Elder and Retirement Financial Abuse and Exploitation FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/south_florida_elder_and_retirement_financial_abuse_and_exploitation_finra_arbitration_and_litigation/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/south_florida_elder_and_retirement_financial_abuse_and_exploitation_finra_arbitration_and_litigation/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2014 21:54:01 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[AAA Arbitration]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Affinity Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Breach of Fiduciary Duty]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Broker/Dealer]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Churning]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Commercial and Business Dispute Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Elder Abuse]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Federal Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[FINRA Arbitration]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Fraud and Misrepresentation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[News of Interest to Seniors]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions 2014]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities and Securities Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[State Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Theft]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Unauthorized Trading]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Unsuitable Investment Recommendations]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Fort Lauderdale, Boca Raton, Delray Beach, Lantana, Lake Worth and West Palm Beach, Florida Elder Financial Abuse and Exploitation Litigation and FINRA Arbitration Attorney: SEC Charges Virginia-Based Broker With Stealing Funds From Elderly Customers The Securities and Exchange Commission recently charged a broker based in Roanoke, Va., with defrauding elderly customers, including some who are&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Fort Lauderdale, Boca Raton, Delray Beach, Lantana, Lake Worth and West Palm Beach, Florida Elder Financial Abuse and Exploitation Litigation and FINRA Arbitration Attorney:</h2>


<p><strong>SEC Charges Virginia-Based Broker With Stealing Funds From Elderly Customers</strong></p>


<p>The Securities and Exchange Commission recently charged a broker based in Roanoke, Va., with defrauding elderly customers, including some who are legally blind, by stealing their funds for her personal use and falsifying their account statements to cover up her fraud.</p>


<p>According to the SEC’s complaint filed in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Virginia, Donna Jessee Tucker siphoned $730,289 from elderly customers and used the money to pay for such personal expenses as vacations, vehicles, clothes, and a country club membership. Tucker ensured that the customers received their monthly account statements electronically, knowing that they were unable or unwilling to access their statements in that format. The SEC further alleges that Tucker engaged in unauthorized trading and other financial transactions while making misrepresentations to customers about their investment accounts and forging brokerage, banking, and other documents.</p>


<p>The SEC’s investigation resulted from a broker-dealer examination of the firm where Tucker worked that was conducted by the SEC’s Philadelphia Regional Office.</p>


<p>In a parallel action, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Western District of Virginia announced criminal charges against Tucker.</p>


<p>Tucker has agreed to settle the SEC’s charges and disgorge the $730,289 in ill-gotten gains either in the criminal case or the civil case. She consented to the entry of an order permanently enjoining her from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 as well as Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5. The settlement is subject to court approval.</p>


<p><strong>Contact Us:</strong></p>


<p>With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of elder abuse, exploitation and securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation.</p>


<p>At the Fort Lauderdale Law Office of Russell L. Forkey, we represent clients throughout South and Central Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Sunrise, Plantation, Coral Springs, Deerfield Beach, Pompano Beach, Delray, Boynton Beach, Hollywood, Lake Worth, Royal Palm Beach, Manalapan, Jupiter, Gulf Stream, Wellington, Fort Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jupiter, Miami, Orlando, Maitland, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Heathrow, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa Beach, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormand Beach, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Dade County, Orange County, Seminole County, Martin County, Brevard County, Indian River County, Volusia County and Monroe County, Florida. The law office of Russell L. Forkey also represents South American, Canadian and other foreign residents that do business with U.S. financial institutions, investment advisors, brokerage and precious metal firms.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Boiler Room and Securities Fraud and Misrepresentation – Boca Raton, West Palm Beach and Fort Lauderdale, Florida Litigation and Arbitration Attorney]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/boiler_room_and_securities_fraud_and_misrepresentation_-_boca_raton_west_palm_beach_and_fort_lauderd/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/boiler_room_and_securities_fraud_and_misrepresentation_-_boca_raton_west_palm_beach_and_fort_lauderd/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2014 21:22:04 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[AAA Arbitration]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Boiler Room Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Commercial and Business Dispute Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Elder Abuse]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Federal Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[FINRA Arbitration]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Fraud and Misrepresentation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[News of Interest to Seniors]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Ponzi Scheme News]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Sales of Unregistered Securities]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions 2014]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities and Securities Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Boiler Room and Securities Fraud and Misrepresentation Litigation and Arbitration Attorney – West Palm Beach, Boca Raton and Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Securities and Exchange Commission v. DDBO Consulting, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 0:14-cv-61685-MGC (S.D. F.L.) Securities and Exchange Commission v. CalPacific Equity Group, LLC, et al., Civil Action No. 2:14-cv-05754-JFW-AGR (C.D. C.A.) SEC&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Boiler Room and Securities Fraud and Misrepresentation Litigation and Arbitration Attorney – West Palm Beach, Boca Raton and Fort Lauderdale, Florida.</h2>


<p><strong><em>Securities and Exchange Commission v. DDBO Consulting, Inc., et al.</em>, Civil Action No. 0:14-cv-61685-MGC (S.D. F.L.)</strong></p>


<p><strong><em>Securities and Exchange Commission v. CalPacific Equity Group, LLC, et al.</em>, Civil Action No. 2:14-cv-05754-JFW-AGR (C.D. C.A.)</strong></p>


<p><strong>SEC Charges Ddbo Consulting, Inc., Calpacific Equity Group, LLC, and Principals with Fraud and Registration Violations</strong></p>


<p>The Securities and Exchange Commission (Commission) recently announced that on July 24, 2014, it filed civil actions in U.S. District Court against individuals and companies behind a boiler room scheme that hyped a company whose new technology was purportedly to be used in the Super Bowl.  The SEC previously charged the operators of the scheme based in the South Florida and Los Angeles areas.  Seniors and other investors were pressured into purchasing stock in Thought Development Inc. (TDI), an unaffiliated Miami Beach-based company that stated its signature invention is a laser-line system that generates a green line on a football field for a first-down marker visible not only on television but also to players, officials, and fans in the stadium.</p>


<p>The SEC charged four executives who helped make the scheme possible and three companies they operate – DDBO Consulting, Inc., DBBG Consulting, Inc., and CalPacific Equity Group, LLC.  Approximately $1.7 million was raised through these companies from more than 110 investors who were told that an initial public offering (IPO) in TDI was imminent and that their money would be used to develop the ground-breaking technology.  Instead, the SEC alleges that the IPO was not forthcoming as promised, and at least 50 percent of the offering proceeds were merely retained by these companies or paid to sales agents through undisclosed commissions and fees. Certain executives, their sales agents and their companies lured investors by misrepresenting that TDI’s technology was about to be used by the National Football League (NFL).  One investor even made an additional $75,000 investment on top of an initial $2,500 investment after being told that NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell purchased TDI’s technology for use in the 2013 Super Bowl. In fact, there was no such arrangement.</p>


<p>In addition to the their companies, the SEC’s complaints charge brothers Dean R. Baker of Coral Springs, Fla., and Daniel R. Baker of Valley Village, Calif., along with Bret A. Grove of Delray Beach, Fla., and Demosthenes Dritsas of Newhall, Calif. The SEC’s complaints allege violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 as well as Sections 10(b) and 15(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5. The defendants all agreed to settle the SEC’s charges. In parallel actions, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California announced criminal charges against Daniel Baker and Dritsas, and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida announced criminal charges against Dean Baker and Grove.</p>


<p><strong>Contact Us:</strong></p>


<p>With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of elder abuse, exploitation and securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation.</p>


<p>At the Fort Lauderdale Law Office of Russell L. Forkey, we represent clients throughout South and Central Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Sunrise, Plantation, Coral Springs, Deerfield Beach, Pompano Beach, Delray, Boynton Beach, Hollywood, Lake Worth, Royal Palm Beach, Manalapan, Jupiter, Gulf Stream, Wellington, Fort Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jupiter, Miami, Orlando, Maitland, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Heathrow, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa Beach, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormand Beach, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Dade County, Orange County, Seminole County, Martin County, Brevard County, Indian River County, Volusia County and Monroe County, Florida. The law office of Russell L. Forkey also represents South American, Canadian and other foreign residents that do business with U.S. financial institutions, investment advisors, brokerage and precious metal firms.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
            <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Accounting Malpractice and Negligence – Boca Raton, West Palm Beach and Fort Lauderdale, Florida Litigation Attorney]]></title>
                <link>https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/accounting_malpractice_and_negligence_-_boca_raton_west_palm_beach_and_fort_lauderdale_florida_litig/</link>
                <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.forkeylaw.com/blog/accounting_malpractice_and_negligence_-_boca_raton_west_palm_beach_and_fort_lauderdale_florida_litig/</guid>
                <dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell L. Forkey]]></dc:creator>
                <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2014 15:19:10 GMT</pubDate>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Accounting Fraud]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Commercial and Business Dispute Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Elder Abuse]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Federal Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Fraud and Misrepresentation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Professional Negligence]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[SEC Enforcement Actions 2014]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[Securities Litigation]]></category>
                
                    <category><![CDATA[State Litigation]]></category>
                
                
                
                
                <description><![CDATA[<p>Accounting Malpractice and Negligence – Boca Raton, West Palm Beach and Fort Lauderdale, Florida Commercial Litigation and Elder Financial Abuse Attorney: SEC Charges Bank Holding Company in Delaware with Improper Accounting and Disclosure of Past Due Loans The Securities and Exchange Commission recently announced accounting and disclosure fraud charges against a Delaware-based bank holding company&hellip;</p>
]]></description>
                <content:encoded><![CDATA[

<p><strong>Accounting Malpractice and Negligence – Boca Raton, West Palm Beach and Fort Lauderdale, Florida Commercial Litigation and Elder Financial Abuse Attorney:</strong></p>


<p><strong>SEC Charges Bank Holding Company in Delaware with Improper Accounting and Disclosure of Past Due Loans</strong></p>


<p>The Securities and Exchange Commission recently announced accounting and disclosure fraud charges against a Delaware-based bank holding company for failing to report the true volume of its loans at least 90 days past due as they substantially increased in number during the financial crisis.</p>


<p>An SEC investigation found that as the real estate market declined in 2009 and 2010 and its construction loans began to mature without repayment or completion of the underlying project, Wilmington Trust Company did not renew, extend, or take other appropriate action for 90 days or more on a material amount of its matured loans. Instead of fully and accurately disclosing the amount of these accruing loans as required by accounting guidance, Wilmington Trust improperly excluded the matured loans from its public financial reporting.</p>


<p>Wilmington Trust, which was acquired by M&T Bank in May 2011, has agreed to pay $18.5 million in disgorgement and prejudgment interest to settle the SEC’s charges.</p>


<p>According to the SEC’s order instituting a settled administrative proceeding, Wilmington Trust omitted from its disclosures in the third and fourth quarters of 2009 approximately $338.9 million and $330.2 million, respectively, in matured loans 90 days or more past due. Instead, it disclosed just $38.7 million in such loans for the third quarter and only $30.6 million in its annual report following the fourth quarter. Wilmington Trust also materially misreported this category of loans in the first and second quarters of 2010. Furthermore, Wilmington Trust failed to accurately disclose during the second half of 2009 the amount of non-accruing loans in its portfolio, and materially understated its loan loss provision and allowance for loan losses during this same period.</p>


<p>Wilmington Trust consented to the entry of the order finding that it violated Sections 17(a)(2) and 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933 as well as the reporting, books and records, and internal controls provisions of the federal securities laws. In addition to the monetary sanctions, Wilmington Trust agreed to cease and desist from committing or causing any violations and any future violations of these provisions.</p>


<p><strong>Contact Us:</strong></p>


<p>With extensive courtroom, arbitration and mediation experience and an in-depth understanding of elder abuse, exploitation,, accounting negligence and securities law, our firm provides all of our clients with the personal service they deserve. Handling cases worth $25,000 or more, we represent clients throughout Florida and across the United States, as well as for foreign individuals that invested in U.S. banks or brokerage firms. Contact us to arrange your free initial consultation.</p>


<p>At the Fort Lauderdale Law Office of Russell L. Forkey, we represent clients throughout South and Central Florida, including Fort Lauderdale, West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Sunrise, Plantation, Coral Springs, Deerfield Beach, Pompano Beach, Delray, Boynton Beach, Hollywood, Lake Worth, Royal Palm Beach, Manalapan, Jupiter, Gulf Stream, Wellington, Fort Pierce, Stuart, Palm City, Jupiter, Miami, Orlando, Maitland, Winter Park, Altamonte Springs, Lake Mary, Heathrow, Melbourne, Palm Bay, Cocoa Beach, Vero Beach, Daytona Beach, Deland, New Smyrna Beach, Ormand Beach, Broward County, Palm Beach County, Dade County, Orange County, Seminole County, Martin County, Brevard County, Indian River County, Volusia County and Monroe County, Florida. The law office of Russell L. Forkey also represents South American, Canadian and other foreign residents that do business with U.S. financial institutions, investment advisors, brokerage and precious metal firms.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
            </item>
        
    </channel>
</rss>