Negligent Supervision

Alejandra Gandara – Florida Unapproved Outside Business Activity and Account Executive Negligent Supervision FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney

Published on: March 29, 2014 | By Russell L. Forkey, P.A.

South Florida Broker/Dealer Negligent Supervision, Breach of Fiduciary and Unapproved Outside Business Activity FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney:

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (FINRA) is a self-regulatory authority assigned the responsibility, by the Securities and Exchange Commission, to license, regulate and discipline securities broker/dealers and their employees, including account executives. In the event that FINRA elects to institute an enforcement action, firms and licensed individuals have the responsibility to reflect such action on their U-4 and/or U-5 filings, which can be viewed on the FINRA website under the broker-check section of the site or by viewing the monthly disciplinary information also provided on the FINRA site.

The monthly disciplinary information is referenced on the FINRA site generally in alphabetical order. This post relates to the following company or individuals. If the reader would like to review the entire FINRA release or the broker-check information concerning this matter, you can follow these highlighted links:

Timothy John Coyle – South Florida Forgery and Unauthorized Activity FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney

Published on: February 28, 2014 | By Russell L. Forkey, P.A.

South Florida Broker/Dealer and Account Executive Negligent Supervision, Forgery and Unauthorized Activity FINRA Arbitration, Litigation and Probate Estate Attorney.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (FINRA) is a self-regulatory authority assigned the responsibility, by the Securities and Exchange Commission, to license, regulate and discipline securities broker/dealers and their employees, including account executives. In the event that FINRA elects to institute an enforcement action, firms and licensed individuals have the responsibility to reflect such action on their U-4 and/or U-5 filings, which can be viewed on the FINRA website under the broker-check section of the site or by viewing the monthly disciplinary information also provided on the FINRA site.

The monthly disciplinary information is referenced on the FINRA site generally in alphabetical order. This post relates to the following company or individuals. If the reader would like to review the entire FINRA release or the broker-check information concerning this matter, you can follow these highlighted links:

South Florida Broker/Dealer and/or Account Executive Negligent Supervision, Selling Away and Unapproved Outside Business Activity FINRA Arbitration, Litigation and Probate Estate Attorney

Published on: February 26, 2014 | By Russell L. Forkey, P.A.

South Florida Broker/Dealer and/or Account Executive Negligent Supervision, Selling Away and Unapproved Outside Business Activity FINRA Arbitration, Litigation and Probate Estate Attorney.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (FINRA) is a self-regulatory authority assigned the responsibility, by the Securities and Exchange Commission, to license, regulate and discipline securities broker/dealers and their employees, including account executives. In the event that FINRA elects to institute an enforcement action, firms and licensed individuals have the responsibility to reflect such action on their U-4 and/or U-5 filings, which can be viewed on the FINRA website under the broker-check section of the site or by viewing the monthly disciplinary information also provided on the FINRA site.

The monthly disciplinary information is referenced on the FINRA site generally in alphabetical order. This post relates to the following company or individuals. If the reader would like to review the entire FINRA release or the broker-check information concerning this matter, you can follow these highlighted links:

Irving Marvin Burstein – South Florida Broker/Dealer and Account Executive Negligent Supervision FINRA Arbitration, Litigation and Probate Attorney

Published on: February 26, 2014 | By Russell L. Forkey, P.A.

Irving Marvin Burstein – South Florida Broker/Dealer and Account Executive Negligent Supervision FINRA Arbitration, Litigation and Probate Estate Attorney.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (FINRA) is a self-regulatory authority assigned the responsibility, by the Securities and Exchange Commission, to license, regulate and discipline securities broker/dealers and their employees, including account executives. In the event that FINRA elects to institute an enforcement action, firms and licensed individuals have the responsibility to reflect such action on their U-4 and/or U-5 filings, which can be viewed on the FINRA website under the broker-check section of the site or by viewing the monthly disciplinary information also provided on the FINRA site.

The monthly disciplinary information is referenced on the FINRA site generally in alphabetical order. This post relates to the following company or individuals. If the reader would like to review the entire FINRA release or the broker-check information concerning this matter, you can follow these highlighted links:

Support Level or Resistance Level – Florida Securities and Investment Mismanagement and Breach of Fiduciary Duty FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney

Published on: January 21, 2014 | By Russell L. Forkey, P.A.

Support Level or Resistance Level – South Florida, including West Palm Beach, Lake Worth, Delray Beach, Royal Palm Beach and Boynton Beach, Securities and Investment Mismanagement and Breach of Fiduciary Duty FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney:

A support level is a price level at which a security tends to stop falling because there is more demand for the security than supply. Technical analysts identify support levels as prices at which a particular security or market has bottomed in the past. When a stock is falling towards its support level, analysts say it is “testing its support” level and that the stock should rebound as soon as it hits the support price. If the security continues to drop through the support level, its outlook is considered bearish. The opposite of a support level is a resistance level.

Please keep in mind that the above information is being provided for educational purposes only. It is not designed to be complete in all material respects. Thus, it should not be relied upon as legal or investment advice. If the reader has any questions concerning the contents of this post, you should consult a qualified professional.

FAQ’s Margin – Fort Lauderdale, Florida Margin Abuse and Negligence FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney

Published on: November 18, 2013 | By Russell L. Forkey, P.A.

Margin Abuse, Margin Miscalculation and Excessive Margin – South Florida FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney:

“Margin” is borrowing money from your broker to buy a stock and using your investment as collateral. Investors generally use margin to increase their purchasing power so that they can own more stock without fully paying for it. But margin exposes investors to the potential for higher losses. Consequently, the use of margin is not appropriate for all investors, especially the unsophisticated or those who are risk adverse.

The Federal Reserve Board and many self-regulatory organizations (SROs), such as the NYSE and FINRA, have rules that govern margin trading. Brokerage firms can establish their own requirements as long as they are at least as restrictive as the Federal Reserve Board and SRO rules. Here are some of the key rules you should know:

South Florida Selling Away, Approved and Unapproved Outside Business Activity and Negligent Supervision FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney

Published on: September 1, 2013 | By Russell L. Forkey, P.A.

South Florida Selling Away, Approved, Unapproved Outside Business Activity and Negligent Supervision FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney:

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (FINRA) is a self-regulatory authority assigned the responsibility, by the Securities and Exchange Commission, to license, regulate and discipline securities broker/dealers and their employees, including account executives. In the event that FINRA elects to institute and enforcement action, firms and licensed individuals have the responsibility to reflect such action of their U-4 and/or U-5 filings, which can be viewed on the FINRA website under the broker-check section of the site or by viewing the monthly disciplinary information also provided on the FINRA site.

The monthly disciplinary information is referenced on the site generally in alphabetical order. This post relates to the following company or individuals. If the reader would like to review the entire FINRA release or the broker-check information concerning this matter, you can follow these highlighted links:

Premium Bond – Florida Municipal, Corporate and Revenue Bond Fraud, Misrepresentation and Breach of Fiduciary Duty FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney

Published on: July 26, 2013 | By Russell L. Forkey, P.A.

Municipal, Corporate and Revenue Bond – South Florida Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Breach of Contract and Negligence FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney:

A premium bond is a bond (Corporate, Revenue and Municipal) with a selling price above face or redemption value. For example, a bond with a face value of $1,000 would be called a premium bond if it sold for $1,100. This price does not include any accrued interest due when the bond is purchased. When a premium bond is called before scheduled maturity, bondholders are usually paid more than face vale, though the amount may be less than the bond is selling for at the time of the call.

Please keep in mind that the above information is being provided for educational purposes only. Thus, it is not designed to be complete in all material respects. It should not be relied upon as legal or investment advice. If the reader has any questions concerning this post, you should contact a qualified professional.

Preliminary Prospectus (Official Statement) – South Florida Fraudulent and Misleading Offering Document FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney

Published on: July 26, 2013 | By Russell L. Forkey, P.A.

Preliminary Prospectus, Preliminary Offering Document, Preliminary Official Statement – South Florida Fraud, Misrepresentation and Omission FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney:

A preliminary prospectus also known as a “red herring” is the first document released by an underwriter of a new issue to prospective investors. The document offers financial details and other information about the issue but does not contain all of the information that will appear in the final prospectus, and parts of the document may be changed before the final prospectus is issued.

Please keep in mind that the above information is being provided for educational purposes only. Thus, it is not designed to be complete in all material respects. Further, this post should not be relied upon as legal or investment advice. If the reader has any questions concerning the contents of this post, you should contact a qualified professional.

Steven J. Brewer – South Florida Promissory Note Fraud and Misrepresentation Litigation and FINRA Arbitration Attorney

Published on: July 17, 2013 | By Russell L. Forkey, P.A.

In the Matter of Steven J. Brewer:

On July 12, 2013, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced the issuance of an Order Instituting Administrative Proceedings Pursuant to Section 15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) and Section 203(f) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (Advisers Act), Making Findings and Imposing Remedial Sanctions (Order) against Steven J. Brewer.

The Order finds that from June 2009 through October 2010, Steven J. Brewer was engaged in the business of effecting transactions in securities for the accounts of others by offering and selling promissory notes to investors. During that time, Brewer was associated with a registered broker dealer and with a registered investment adviser. On April 22, 2013, a judgment was entered by consent against Brewer, permanently enjoining him from future violations of Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder and from aiding and abetting future violations of Section 15(c) of the Exchange Act and Sections 206(1) and 206(2) of the Advisers Act, in the civil action entitled Securities and Exchange Commission v. Steven Brewer, et al., Civil Action Number 10-cv-6932-BMM-AK, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The Commission’s complaint alleged that, from June 2009 through at least the end of September 2010, Brewer and others participated in fraudulent, unregistered offerings of promissory notes issued by FPA Limited, an Isle of Man company, in the aggregate amount of $5.6 million to at least 74 investors. The offering materials created and used for the offerings misrepresented the risk of the investment and misrepresented the use of proceeds of the offering. The complaint alleged that Brewer originated the fraudulent offerings and participated in creating the fraudulent offering documents. Brewer also controlled the bank account into which the proceeds of the offerings were deposited and then disbursed, primarily to BIG.