Unauthorized Trading

Irving Marvin Burstein – South Florida Broker/Dealer and Account Executive Negligent Supervision FINRA Arbitration, Litigation and Probate Attorney

Published on: February 26, 2014 | By Russell L. Forkey, P.A.

Irving Marvin Burstein – South Florida Broker/Dealer and Account Executive Negligent Supervision FINRA Arbitration, Litigation and Probate Estate Attorney.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (FINRA) is a self-regulatory authority assigned the responsibility, by the Securities and Exchange Commission, to license, regulate and discipline securities broker/dealers and their employees, including account executives. In the event that FINRA elects to institute an enforcement action, firms and licensed individuals have the responsibility to reflect such action on their U-4 and/or U-5 filings, which can be viewed on the FINRA website under the broker-check section of the site or by viewing the monthly disciplinary information also provided on the FINRA site.

The monthly disciplinary information is referenced on the FINRA site generally in alphabetical order. This post relates to the following company or individuals. If the reader would like to review the entire FINRA release or the broker-check information concerning this matter, you can follow these highlighted links:

Financial Elder Abuse – Financial Elder Exploitation – Florida Litigation and FINRA Arbitration Attorney

Published on: November 25, 2013 | By Russell L. Forkey, P.A.

Financial Elder Abuse and Elder Exploitation – Boca Raton, Delray Beach, West Palm Beach and Fort Lauderdale, Florida Litigation and Arbitration Attorney:

Florida Statute Section 415.1111 grants to vulnerable (elder) adults a cause of action as a result of financial and other types of abuse. It provides that a vulnerable adult who has been abused, neglected, or exploited as specified in the law has a cause of action against any perpetrator and may recover actual and punitive damages for such abuse, neglect, or exploitation. The action may be brought by the vulnerable adult, or that person’s guardian, by a person or organization acting on behalf of the vulnerable adult with the consent of that person or that person’s guardian, or by the personal representative of the estate of a deceased victim without regard to whether the cause of death resulted from the abuse, neglect, or exploitation. The action may be brought in any court of competent jurisdiction to enforce such action and to recover actual and punitive damages for any deprivation of or infringement on the rights of a vulnerable adult. A party who prevails in any such action may be entitled to recover reasonable attorney’s fees, costs of the action, and damages. The remedies provided in this section are in addition to and cumulative with other legal and administrative remedies available to a vulnerable adult.

As the elder population in Florida has increased, incidents of financial elder abuse has accelerated at an alarming rate. An area of financial elder abuse that has recently exploded is the twisting (unnecessary sale and purchase of annuities) of variable and fixed annuities.

Common Stock, Preferred Stock, Corporate Bonds, Municipal Bonds, ETF’s and Mutual Funds – South Florida Securities and Investment Fraud, Negligence and Breach of Fiduciary Duty FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney

Published on: November 6, 2013 | By Russell L. Forkey, P.A.

Common Stocks, Preferred Stocks, Corporate Bonds, Municipal Bonds, Promissory Notes, Exchange-Traded Funds (ETF’s), and Mutual Funds – South Florida Securities and Investment Fraud, Negligence and Breach of Fiduciary Duty FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney:

The elements of a breach of fiduciary duty action are (1) the existence of a fiduciary duty and (2) the breach of that duty that was the proximate cause of the plaintiff’s damages. A fiduciary relationship exists when confidence is reposed by one party and trust accepted by the other. Such a relationship exists where confidence is reposed on one side and there is resulting superiority and influence on the other. When a fiduciary relationship has not been created by an express agreement, the question of whether the relationship exists generally depends upon the specific facts and circumstances surrounding the relationship of the parties in a transaction in which they are involved.

The law is clear that a broker owes a fiduciary duty of care and loyalty to a securities investor. The type and extent of this duty is fact specific. In other words, your relationship with, in the case, your broker/dealer and/or account executive will be determinative of the type of duty that you are owed. However, please keep in mind that the extent of this duty is organic. It is constantly changing. It is for this reason that your specific circumstances need to be reviewed by a qualified professional.

Sales Practice Violations – Discretionary Trading Without Authorization, Unauthorized Trading, Unsuitable and Excessive Trading and Churning – South Florida FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney

Published on: July 3, 2013 | By Russell L. Forkey, P.A.

Securities and Exchange Commission Sustains FINRA Disciplinary Action against Registered Representative and Supervisor

The Securities and Exchange Commission has sustained disciplinary action by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) against William J. Murphy and Carl M. Birkelbach, formerly associated with member firm Birkelbach Investment Securities, Inc. In its opinion, the Commission sustained FINRA’s finding of sales practice violations by Murphy, which included discretionary trading without authorization, unauthorized trading, unsuitable and excessive trading, churning, and the creation and distribution of misleading communications. In one customer account at issue, Murphy engaged in excessive options trading that generated over one million dollars in commissions in the span of approximately three-and-half years. The Commission also sustained FINRA’s findings of supervisory violations by Birkelbach for ignoring obvious and repeated red flags with regard to Murphy’s handling of customer accounts. Finally, the Commission has sustained FINRA’s imposition of sanctions: a bar in all capacities and the disgorgement of $585,174.67 for Murphy and bar in all capacities for Birkelbach.

Contact Us:

Gary Lee Cousino – Florida Securities Unauthorized Trade, Unsuitability and Breach of Fiduciary Duty FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney

Published on: January 21, 2013 | By Russell L. Forkey, P.A.

Gary Lee Cousino – Registered Representative, Mackinac Island, Michigan:

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (FINRA) is a self-regulatory authority assigned the responsibility, by the Securities and Exchange Commission, to license, regulate and discipline securities broker/dealers and their employees, including account executives. In the event that FINRA elects to institute and enforcement action, firms and licensed individuals have the responsibility to reflect such action of their U-4 and/or U-5 filings, which can be viewed on the FINRA website under the broker-check section of the site or by viewing the monthly disciplinary information also provided on the FINRA site.

The monthly disciplinary information is referenced on the site generally in alphabetical order. This post relates to the following company or individuals. If the reader would like to review the entire FINRA release or the broker-check information concerning this matter, you can follow these highlighted links:

Milton Charles Ault III – Florida Unauthorized Stock and Bond Trading FINRA Arbitration and Litigation Attorney

Published on: January 20, 2013 | By Russell L. Forkey, P.A.

Milton Charles Ault III – Registered Principal, Fountain Valley, California:

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (FINRA) is a self-regulatory authority assigned the responsibility, by the Securities and Exchange Commission, to license, regulate and discipline securities broker/dealers and their employees, including account executives. In the event that FINRA elects to institute and enforcement action, firms and licensed individuals have the responsibility to reflect such action of their U-4 and/or U-5 filings, which can be viewed on the FINRA website under the broker-check section of the site or by viewing the monthly disciplinary information also provided on the FINRA site.

The monthly disciplinary information is referenced on the site generally in alphabetical order. This post relates to the following company or individuals. If the reader would like to review the entire FINRA release or the broker-check information concerning this matter, you can follow these highlighted links: